Cargando…

Adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in endoscopic technology adenoma miss rate still is up to 20% contributing to interval cancers. Improved imaging modalities have been introduced to increase adenoma detection rate (ADR). Recently, narrow-band imaging (NBI) (Exera II series, Olympus Corporation) wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bürger, Martin, Weber, Marko, Petersen, Iver, Stallmach, Andreas, Schmidt, Carsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35960070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029858
_version_ 1784767171313795072
author Bürger, Martin
Weber, Marko
Petersen, Iver
Stallmach, Andreas
Schmidt, Carsten
author_facet Bürger, Martin
Weber, Marko
Petersen, Iver
Stallmach, Andreas
Schmidt, Carsten
author_sort Bürger, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in endoscopic technology adenoma miss rate still is up to 20% contributing to interval cancers. Improved imaging modalities have been introduced to increase adenoma detection rate (ADR). Recently, narrow-band imaging (NBI) (Exera II series, Olympus Corporation) was not significantly better than high-definition white light colonoscopy (HD-WLC). An improved second generation of NBI (190-NBI) is characterized by better illumination of the bowel lumen and may be associated with a higher ADR. METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized study on patients referred to the Jena University Hospital for screening or surveillance colonoscopy between January 2015 and April 2017. Participating endoscopists were divided into 2 subgroups depending on their individual experience. Colonoscopy was performed by use of HD-WLC or 190-NBI upon withdrawal. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-three patients participated in the study. Eighty patients were excluded (insufficient bowel cleansing [n = 34], anticoagulation precluding polypectomy [n=15], partial colonic resection [n=9], other reasons [n = 22]). Mean age was 66.9 years (standard deviation 10.3 years), and 253 patients were male (53.5%). Bowel preparation and withdrawal time were not different. ADR among all subgroups was 39.4% using HD-WLC, but only 29.1% were using 190-NBI (P = .02). Number of polyps per patient was lower using 190-NBI than with HD-WLC (0.58 vs 0.86; P = .02). Subgroup analysis revealed that 190-NBI was inferior to HD-WLC only in unexperienced endoscopists. CONCLUSION: In our stud,y ADR was lower by use of 190-NBI. These differences persisted only in unexperienced investigators. 190-NBI seems to be more challenging regarding ADR, requiring more intensive training prior to implementing this technology in daily clinical care. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03081975).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9371537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93715372022-08-16 Adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: A randomized controlled trial Bürger, Martin Weber, Marko Petersen, Iver Stallmach, Andreas Schmidt, Carsten Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in endoscopic technology adenoma miss rate still is up to 20% contributing to interval cancers. Improved imaging modalities have been introduced to increase adenoma detection rate (ADR). Recently, narrow-band imaging (NBI) (Exera II series, Olympus Corporation) was not significantly better than high-definition white light colonoscopy (HD-WLC). An improved second generation of NBI (190-NBI) is characterized by better illumination of the bowel lumen and may be associated with a higher ADR. METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized study on patients referred to the Jena University Hospital for screening or surveillance colonoscopy between January 2015 and April 2017. Participating endoscopists were divided into 2 subgroups depending on their individual experience. Colonoscopy was performed by use of HD-WLC or 190-NBI upon withdrawal. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-three patients participated in the study. Eighty patients were excluded (insufficient bowel cleansing [n = 34], anticoagulation precluding polypectomy [n=15], partial colonic resection [n=9], other reasons [n = 22]). Mean age was 66.9 years (standard deviation 10.3 years), and 253 patients were male (53.5%). Bowel preparation and withdrawal time were not different. ADR among all subgroups was 39.4% using HD-WLC, but only 29.1% were using 190-NBI (P = .02). Number of polyps per patient was lower using 190-NBI than with HD-WLC (0.58 vs 0.86; P = .02). Subgroup analysis revealed that 190-NBI was inferior to HD-WLC only in unexperienced endoscopists. CONCLUSION: In our stud,y ADR was lower by use of 190-NBI. These differences persisted only in unexperienced investigators. 190-NBI seems to be more challenging regarding ADR, requiring more intensive training prior to implementing this technology in daily clinical care. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03081975). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9371537/ /pubmed/35960070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029858 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bürger, Martin
Weber, Marko
Petersen, Iver
Stallmach, Andreas
Schmidt, Carsten
Adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: A randomized controlled trial
title Adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35960070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029858
work_keys_str_mv AT burgermartin adenomadetectionrateusingnarrowbandimagingisinferiortohighdefinitionwhitelightcolonoscopyinscreeningandsurveillancecolonoscopiesindailyclinicalcarearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT webermarko adenomadetectionrateusingnarrowbandimagingisinferiortohighdefinitionwhitelightcolonoscopyinscreeningandsurveillancecolonoscopiesindailyclinicalcarearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT peterseniver adenomadetectionrateusingnarrowbandimagingisinferiortohighdefinitionwhitelightcolonoscopyinscreeningandsurveillancecolonoscopiesindailyclinicalcarearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stallmachandreas adenomadetectionrateusingnarrowbandimagingisinferiortohighdefinitionwhitelightcolonoscopyinscreeningandsurveillancecolonoscopiesindailyclinicalcarearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schmidtcarsten adenomadetectionrateusingnarrowbandimagingisinferiortohighdefinitionwhitelightcolonoscopyinscreeningandsurveillancecolonoscopiesindailyclinicalcarearandomizedcontrolledtrial