Cargando…
Adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: A randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in endoscopic technology adenoma miss rate still is up to 20% contributing to interval cancers. Improved imaging modalities have been introduced to increase adenoma detection rate (ADR). Recently, narrow-band imaging (NBI) (Exera II series, Olympus Corporation) wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35960070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029858 |
_version_ | 1784767171313795072 |
---|---|
author | Bürger, Martin Weber, Marko Petersen, Iver Stallmach, Andreas Schmidt, Carsten |
author_facet | Bürger, Martin Weber, Marko Petersen, Iver Stallmach, Andreas Schmidt, Carsten |
author_sort | Bürger, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in endoscopic technology adenoma miss rate still is up to 20% contributing to interval cancers. Improved imaging modalities have been introduced to increase adenoma detection rate (ADR). Recently, narrow-band imaging (NBI) (Exera II series, Olympus Corporation) was not significantly better than high-definition white light colonoscopy (HD-WLC). An improved second generation of NBI (190-NBI) is characterized by better illumination of the bowel lumen and may be associated with a higher ADR. METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized study on patients referred to the Jena University Hospital for screening or surveillance colonoscopy between January 2015 and April 2017. Participating endoscopists were divided into 2 subgroups depending on their individual experience. Colonoscopy was performed by use of HD-WLC or 190-NBI upon withdrawal. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-three patients participated in the study. Eighty patients were excluded (insufficient bowel cleansing [n = 34], anticoagulation precluding polypectomy [n=15], partial colonic resection [n=9], other reasons [n = 22]). Mean age was 66.9 years (standard deviation 10.3 years), and 253 patients were male (53.5%). Bowel preparation and withdrawal time were not different. ADR among all subgroups was 39.4% using HD-WLC, but only 29.1% were using 190-NBI (P = .02). Number of polyps per patient was lower using 190-NBI than with HD-WLC (0.58 vs 0.86; P = .02). Subgroup analysis revealed that 190-NBI was inferior to HD-WLC only in unexperienced endoscopists. CONCLUSION: In our stud,y ADR was lower by use of 190-NBI. These differences persisted only in unexperienced investigators. 190-NBI seems to be more challenging regarding ADR, requiring more intensive training prior to implementing this technology in daily clinical care. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03081975). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9371537 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93715372022-08-16 Adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: A randomized controlled trial Bürger, Martin Weber, Marko Petersen, Iver Stallmach, Andreas Schmidt, Carsten Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in endoscopic technology adenoma miss rate still is up to 20% contributing to interval cancers. Improved imaging modalities have been introduced to increase adenoma detection rate (ADR). Recently, narrow-band imaging (NBI) (Exera II series, Olympus Corporation) was not significantly better than high-definition white light colonoscopy (HD-WLC). An improved second generation of NBI (190-NBI) is characterized by better illumination of the bowel lumen and may be associated with a higher ADR. METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized study on patients referred to the Jena University Hospital for screening or surveillance colonoscopy between January 2015 and April 2017. Participating endoscopists were divided into 2 subgroups depending on their individual experience. Colonoscopy was performed by use of HD-WLC or 190-NBI upon withdrawal. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-three patients participated in the study. Eighty patients were excluded (insufficient bowel cleansing [n = 34], anticoagulation precluding polypectomy [n=15], partial colonic resection [n=9], other reasons [n = 22]). Mean age was 66.9 years (standard deviation 10.3 years), and 253 patients were male (53.5%). Bowel preparation and withdrawal time were not different. ADR among all subgroups was 39.4% using HD-WLC, but only 29.1% were using 190-NBI (P = .02). Number of polyps per patient was lower using 190-NBI than with HD-WLC (0.58 vs 0.86; P = .02). Subgroup analysis revealed that 190-NBI was inferior to HD-WLC only in unexperienced endoscopists. CONCLUSION: In our stud,y ADR was lower by use of 190-NBI. These differences persisted only in unexperienced investigators. 190-NBI seems to be more challenging regarding ADR, requiring more intensive training prior to implementing this technology in daily clinical care. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03081975). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9371537/ /pubmed/35960070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029858 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bürger, Martin Weber, Marko Petersen, Iver Stallmach, Andreas Schmidt, Carsten Adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: A randomized controlled trial |
title | Adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: A randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: A randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: A randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | adenoma detection rate using narrow-band imaging is inferior to high-definition white light colonoscopy in screening and surveillance colonoscopies in daily clinical care: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35960070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029858 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burgermartin adenomadetectionrateusingnarrowbandimagingisinferiortohighdefinitionwhitelightcolonoscopyinscreeningandsurveillancecolonoscopiesindailyclinicalcarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT webermarko adenomadetectionrateusingnarrowbandimagingisinferiortohighdefinitionwhitelightcolonoscopyinscreeningandsurveillancecolonoscopiesindailyclinicalcarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT peterseniver adenomadetectionrateusingnarrowbandimagingisinferiortohighdefinitionwhitelightcolonoscopyinscreeningandsurveillancecolonoscopiesindailyclinicalcarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT stallmachandreas adenomadetectionrateusingnarrowbandimagingisinferiortohighdefinitionwhitelightcolonoscopyinscreeningandsurveillancecolonoscopiesindailyclinicalcarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schmidtcarsten adenomadetectionrateusingnarrowbandimagingisinferiortohighdefinitionwhitelightcolonoscopyinscreeningandsurveillancecolonoscopiesindailyclinicalcarearandomizedcontrolledtrial |