Cargando…
Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis
The indications of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for T4 colorectal cancer are controversial because the advantages of MIS are unclear. Therefore, we compared overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) as the primary endpoint, and short-term outcome, alteration in perioperative labor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35960060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029869 |
_version_ | 1784767176324939776 |
---|---|
author | Imaizumi, Ken Homma, Shigenori Miyaoka, Yoichi Matsui, Hiroki Ichikawa, Nobuki Yoshida, Tadashi Takahashi, Norihiko Taketomi, Akinobu |
author_facet | Imaizumi, Ken Homma, Shigenori Miyaoka, Yoichi Matsui, Hiroki Ichikawa, Nobuki Yoshida, Tadashi Takahashi, Norihiko Taketomi, Akinobu |
author_sort | Imaizumi, Ken |
collection | PubMed |
description | The indications of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for T4 colorectal cancer are controversial because the advantages of MIS are unclear. Therefore, we compared overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) as the primary endpoint, and short-term outcome, alteration in perioperative laboratory data, and the interval of postoperative chemotherapy from operation as secondary endpoints, between MIS and open surgery (OPEN) using a matched-pair analysis. We explored the advantages of MIS for T4 colorectal cancer. In this retrospective single-institution study, we included 125 patients with clinical T4 colorectal cancer who underwent curative-intent surgery of the primary tumor between October 2010 and September 2019. Conversion cases were excluded. MIS patients were matched to OPEN patients (ratio of 1:2) according to tumor location, clinical T stage, and preoperative treatment. We identified 25 and 50 patients who underwent OPEN and MIS, respectively, including 31 with distant metastasis. Both groups had similar background characteristics. The rate of major morbidities (Clavien-Dindo grade > III) was comparable between the 2 groups (P = .597), and there was no mortality in either group. MIS tended to result in shorter postoperative hospitalization than OPEN (P = .073). Perioperative alterations in laboratory data revealed that MIS suppressed surgical invasiveness better compared to OPEN. Postoperative chemotherapy, especially for patients with distant metastasis who underwent primary tumor resection, tended to be started earlier in the MIS group than in the OPEN group (P = .075). OS and RFS were comparable between the 2 groups (P = .996 and .870, respectively). In the multivariate analyses, MIS was not a significant prognostic factor for poor OS and RFS. MIS was surgically safe and showed similar oncological outcomes to OPEN—with the potential of reduced invasiveness and enhanced recovery from surgery. Therefore, patients undergoing MIS might receive subsequent postoperative treatments earlier. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9371553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93715532022-08-16 Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis Imaizumi, Ken Homma, Shigenori Miyaoka, Yoichi Matsui, Hiroki Ichikawa, Nobuki Yoshida, Tadashi Takahashi, Norihiko Taketomi, Akinobu Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article The indications of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for T4 colorectal cancer are controversial because the advantages of MIS are unclear. Therefore, we compared overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) as the primary endpoint, and short-term outcome, alteration in perioperative laboratory data, and the interval of postoperative chemotherapy from operation as secondary endpoints, between MIS and open surgery (OPEN) using a matched-pair analysis. We explored the advantages of MIS for T4 colorectal cancer. In this retrospective single-institution study, we included 125 patients with clinical T4 colorectal cancer who underwent curative-intent surgery of the primary tumor between October 2010 and September 2019. Conversion cases were excluded. MIS patients were matched to OPEN patients (ratio of 1:2) according to tumor location, clinical T stage, and preoperative treatment. We identified 25 and 50 patients who underwent OPEN and MIS, respectively, including 31 with distant metastasis. Both groups had similar background characteristics. The rate of major morbidities (Clavien-Dindo grade > III) was comparable between the 2 groups (P = .597), and there was no mortality in either group. MIS tended to result in shorter postoperative hospitalization than OPEN (P = .073). Perioperative alterations in laboratory data revealed that MIS suppressed surgical invasiveness better compared to OPEN. Postoperative chemotherapy, especially for patients with distant metastasis who underwent primary tumor resection, tended to be started earlier in the MIS group than in the OPEN group (P = .075). OS and RFS were comparable between the 2 groups (P = .996 and .870, respectively). In the multivariate analyses, MIS was not a significant prognostic factor for poor OS and RFS. MIS was surgically safe and showed similar oncological outcomes to OPEN—with the potential of reduced invasiveness and enhanced recovery from surgery. Therefore, patients undergoing MIS might receive subsequent postoperative treatments earlier. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9371553/ /pubmed/35960060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029869 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Imaizumi, Ken Homma, Shigenori Miyaoka, Yoichi Matsui, Hiroki Ichikawa, Nobuki Yoshida, Tadashi Takahashi, Norihiko Taketomi, Akinobu Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis |
title | Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis |
title_full | Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis |
title_fullStr | Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis |
title_short | Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis |
title_sort | exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical t4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: a matched-pair analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35960060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029869 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT imaizumiken explorationoftheadvantagesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforclinicalt4colorectalcancercomparedwithopensurgeryamatchedpairanalysis AT hommashigenori explorationoftheadvantagesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforclinicalt4colorectalcancercomparedwithopensurgeryamatchedpairanalysis AT miyaokayoichi explorationoftheadvantagesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforclinicalt4colorectalcancercomparedwithopensurgeryamatchedpairanalysis AT matsuihiroki explorationoftheadvantagesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforclinicalt4colorectalcancercomparedwithopensurgeryamatchedpairanalysis AT ichikawanobuki explorationoftheadvantagesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforclinicalt4colorectalcancercomparedwithopensurgeryamatchedpairanalysis AT yoshidatadashi explorationoftheadvantagesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforclinicalt4colorectalcancercomparedwithopensurgeryamatchedpairanalysis AT takahashinorihiko explorationoftheadvantagesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforclinicalt4colorectalcancercomparedwithopensurgeryamatchedpairanalysis AT taketomiakinobu explorationoftheadvantagesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforclinicalt4colorectalcancercomparedwithopensurgeryamatchedpairanalysis |