Cargando…

Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis

The indications of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for T4 colorectal cancer are controversial because the advantages of MIS are unclear. Therefore, we compared overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) as the primary endpoint, and short-term outcome, alteration in perioperative labor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imaizumi, Ken, Homma, Shigenori, Miyaoka, Yoichi, Matsui, Hiroki, Ichikawa, Nobuki, Yoshida, Tadashi, Takahashi, Norihiko, Taketomi, Akinobu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35960060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029869
_version_ 1784767176324939776
author Imaizumi, Ken
Homma, Shigenori
Miyaoka, Yoichi
Matsui, Hiroki
Ichikawa, Nobuki
Yoshida, Tadashi
Takahashi, Norihiko
Taketomi, Akinobu
author_facet Imaizumi, Ken
Homma, Shigenori
Miyaoka, Yoichi
Matsui, Hiroki
Ichikawa, Nobuki
Yoshida, Tadashi
Takahashi, Norihiko
Taketomi, Akinobu
author_sort Imaizumi, Ken
collection PubMed
description The indications of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for T4 colorectal cancer are controversial because the advantages of MIS are unclear. Therefore, we compared overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) as the primary endpoint, and short-term outcome, alteration in perioperative laboratory data, and the interval of postoperative chemotherapy from operation as secondary endpoints, between MIS and open surgery (OPEN) using a matched-pair analysis. We explored the advantages of MIS for T4 colorectal cancer. In this retrospective single-institution study, we included 125 patients with clinical T4 colorectal cancer who underwent curative-intent surgery of the primary tumor between October 2010 and September 2019. Conversion cases were excluded. MIS patients were matched to OPEN patients (ratio of 1:2) according to tumor location, clinical T stage, and preoperative treatment. We identified 25 and 50 patients who underwent OPEN and MIS, respectively, including 31 with distant metastasis. Both groups had similar background characteristics. The rate of major morbidities (Clavien-Dindo grade > III) was comparable between the 2 groups (P = .597), and there was no mortality in either group. MIS tended to result in shorter postoperative hospitalization than OPEN (P = .073). Perioperative alterations in laboratory data revealed that MIS suppressed surgical invasiveness better compared to OPEN. Postoperative chemotherapy, especially for patients with distant metastasis who underwent primary tumor resection, tended to be started earlier in the MIS group than in the OPEN group (P = .075). OS and RFS were comparable between the 2 groups (P = .996 and .870, respectively). In the multivariate analyses, MIS was not a significant prognostic factor for poor OS and RFS. MIS was surgically safe and showed similar oncological outcomes to OPEN—with the potential of reduced invasiveness and enhanced recovery from surgery. Therefore, patients undergoing MIS might receive subsequent postoperative treatments earlier.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9371553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93715532022-08-16 Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis Imaizumi, Ken Homma, Shigenori Miyaoka, Yoichi Matsui, Hiroki Ichikawa, Nobuki Yoshida, Tadashi Takahashi, Norihiko Taketomi, Akinobu Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article The indications of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for T4 colorectal cancer are controversial because the advantages of MIS are unclear. Therefore, we compared overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) as the primary endpoint, and short-term outcome, alteration in perioperative laboratory data, and the interval of postoperative chemotherapy from operation as secondary endpoints, between MIS and open surgery (OPEN) using a matched-pair analysis. We explored the advantages of MIS for T4 colorectal cancer. In this retrospective single-institution study, we included 125 patients with clinical T4 colorectal cancer who underwent curative-intent surgery of the primary tumor between October 2010 and September 2019. Conversion cases were excluded. MIS patients were matched to OPEN patients (ratio of 1:2) according to tumor location, clinical T stage, and preoperative treatment. We identified 25 and 50 patients who underwent OPEN and MIS, respectively, including 31 with distant metastasis. Both groups had similar background characteristics. The rate of major morbidities (Clavien-Dindo grade > III) was comparable between the 2 groups (P = .597), and there was no mortality in either group. MIS tended to result in shorter postoperative hospitalization than OPEN (P = .073). Perioperative alterations in laboratory data revealed that MIS suppressed surgical invasiveness better compared to OPEN. Postoperative chemotherapy, especially for patients with distant metastasis who underwent primary tumor resection, tended to be started earlier in the MIS group than in the OPEN group (P = .075). OS and RFS were comparable between the 2 groups (P = .996 and .870, respectively). In the multivariate analyses, MIS was not a significant prognostic factor for poor OS and RFS. MIS was surgically safe and showed similar oncological outcomes to OPEN—with the potential of reduced invasiveness and enhanced recovery from surgery. Therefore, patients undergoing MIS might receive subsequent postoperative treatments earlier. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9371553/ /pubmed/35960060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029869 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Imaizumi, Ken
Homma, Shigenori
Miyaoka, Yoichi
Matsui, Hiroki
Ichikawa, Nobuki
Yoshida, Tadashi
Takahashi, Norihiko
Taketomi, Akinobu
Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis
title Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis
title_full Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis
title_fullStr Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis
title_full_unstemmed Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis
title_short Exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical T4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: A matched-pair analysis
title_sort exploration of the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for clinical t4 colorectal cancer compared with open surgery: a matched-pair analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35960060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029869
work_keys_str_mv AT imaizumiken explorationoftheadvantagesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforclinicalt4colorectalcancercomparedwithopensurgeryamatchedpairanalysis
AT hommashigenori explorationoftheadvantagesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforclinicalt4colorectalcancercomparedwithopensurgeryamatchedpairanalysis
AT miyaokayoichi explorationoftheadvantagesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforclinicalt4colorectalcancercomparedwithopensurgeryamatchedpairanalysis
AT matsuihiroki explorationoftheadvantagesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforclinicalt4colorectalcancercomparedwithopensurgeryamatchedpairanalysis
AT ichikawanobuki explorationoftheadvantagesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforclinicalt4colorectalcancercomparedwithopensurgeryamatchedpairanalysis
AT yoshidatadashi explorationoftheadvantagesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforclinicalt4colorectalcancercomparedwithopensurgeryamatchedpairanalysis
AT takahashinorihiko explorationoftheadvantagesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforclinicalt4colorectalcancercomparedwithopensurgeryamatchedpairanalysis
AT taketomiakinobu explorationoftheadvantagesofminimallyinvasivesurgeryforclinicalt4colorectalcancercomparedwithopensurgeryamatchedpairanalysis