Cargando…

Outcomes of acetabular fractures treated with acute fix and replace versus open reduction and internal fixation in elderly population: a multicentric retrospective study

PURPOSE: The optimal operative treatment for displaced acetabular fractures in elderly population is still object of debate. Acute fix and replace procedure, the so called “combined hip procedure” (CHP), was introduced because of the poor results of the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smakaj, Amarildo, Rovere, Giuseppe, Scoscina, Dalila, De Mauro, Domenico, Erasmo, Rocco, Battiato, Concetto, Maccauro, Giulio, Liuzza, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05535-6
_version_ 1784767197784047616
author Smakaj, Amarildo
Rovere, Giuseppe
Scoscina, Dalila
De Mauro, Domenico
Erasmo, Rocco
Battiato, Concetto
Maccauro, Giulio
Liuzza, Francesco
author_facet Smakaj, Amarildo
Rovere, Giuseppe
Scoscina, Dalila
De Mauro, Domenico
Erasmo, Rocco
Battiato, Concetto
Maccauro, Giulio
Liuzza, Francesco
author_sort Smakaj, Amarildo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The optimal operative treatment for displaced acetabular fractures in elderly population is still object of debate. Acute fix and replace procedure, the so called “combined hip procedure” (CHP), was introduced because of the poor results of the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) alone. The aim of the study is to compare clinical outcomes of CHP and ORIF alone for the treatment of acetabular fractures in elderly patients. METHODS: This is the largest multicentric retrospective analytical study, with a case–control design on the issue. Hospital records and clinical notes were reviewed to collect demographic, peri-operative, and clinical data. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients met the inclusion criteria: 24 patients entered the CHP group whereas 21 entered the ORIF control group. The mean age was 69.5 +  − 1.12 years in the ORIF group and 73.4 +  − 1.84 in the control group. The most frequent traumatic mechanism was the fall from same level in both groups (37.5% CHP; 42.9% ORIF). Operating time was significantly lower in the CHP group compared to the ORIF group (207 +  − 11.0 ORIF; 175 +  − 9.16 CHP; p < 0.05). Moreover, full weight-bearing was allowed significantly earlier in the CHP group compared to ORIF alone (37.3 +  − 1.59 ORIF; 32.5 +  − 1.69 CHP; p < 0.05). Among the clinician-completed scores, the HHS at three months was higher in the CHP group (66.3 +  − 1.83 ORIF;73.6 +  − 2.09 CHP; p < 0.05). All the other clinical outcomes were similar in both study groups. CONCLUSION: CHP is desirable treatment option in elderly patients with acetabular fracture when there are poor expected outcomes in terms of joint survival with ORIF alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9371631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93716312022-08-12 Outcomes of acetabular fractures treated with acute fix and replace versus open reduction and internal fixation in elderly population: a multicentric retrospective study Smakaj, Amarildo Rovere, Giuseppe Scoscina, Dalila De Mauro, Domenico Erasmo, Rocco Battiato, Concetto Maccauro, Giulio Liuzza, Francesco Int Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: The optimal operative treatment for displaced acetabular fractures in elderly population is still object of debate. Acute fix and replace procedure, the so called “combined hip procedure” (CHP), was introduced because of the poor results of the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) alone. The aim of the study is to compare clinical outcomes of CHP and ORIF alone for the treatment of acetabular fractures in elderly patients. METHODS: This is the largest multicentric retrospective analytical study, with a case–control design on the issue. Hospital records and clinical notes were reviewed to collect demographic, peri-operative, and clinical data. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients met the inclusion criteria: 24 patients entered the CHP group whereas 21 entered the ORIF control group. The mean age was 69.5 +  − 1.12 years in the ORIF group and 73.4 +  − 1.84 in the control group. The most frequent traumatic mechanism was the fall from same level in both groups (37.5% CHP; 42.9% ORIF). Operating time was significantly lower in the CHP group compared to the ORIF group (207 +  − 11.0 ORIF; 175 +  − 9.16 CHP; p < 0.05). Moreover, full weight-bearing was allowed significantly earlier in the CHP group compared to ORIF alone (37.3 +  − 1.59 ORIF; 32.5 +  − 1.69 CHP; p < 0.05). Among the clinician-completed scores, the HHS at three months was higher in the CHP group (66.3 +  − 1.83 ORIF;73.6 +  − 2.09 CHP; p < 0.05). All the other clinical outcomes were similar in both study groups. CONCLUSION: CHP is desirable treatment option in elderly patients with acetabular fracture when there are poor expected outcomes in terms of joint survival with ORIF alone. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-08-11 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9371631/ /pubmed/35953732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05535-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Smakaj, Amarildo
Rovere, Giuseppe
Scoscina, Dalila
De Mauro, Domenico
Erasmo, Rocco
Battiato, Concetto
Maccauro, Giulio
Liuzza, Francesco
Outcomes of acetabular fractures treated with acute fix and replace versus open reduction and internal fixation in elderly population: a multicentric retrospective study
title Outcomes of acetabular fractures treated with acute fix and replace versus open reduction and internal fixation in elderly population: a multicentric retrospective study
title_full Outcomes of acetabular fractures treated with acute fix and replace versus open reduction and internal fixation in elderly population: a multicentric retrospective study
title_fullStr Outcomes of acetabular fractures treated with acute fix and replace versus open reduction and internal fixation in elderly population: a multicentric retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of acetabular fractures treated with acute fix and replace versus open reduction and internal fixation in elderly population: a multicentric retrospective study
title_short Outcomes of acetabular fractures treated with acute fix and replace versus open reduction and internal fixation in elderly population: a multicentric retrospective study
title_sort outcomes of acetabular fractures treated with acute fix and replace versus open reduction and internal fixation in elderly population: a multicentric retrospective study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953732
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05535-6
work_keys_str_mv AT smakajamarildo outcomesofacetabularfracturestreatedwithacutefixandreplaceversusopenreductionandinternalfixationinelderlypopulationamulticentricretrospectivestudy
AT roveregiuseppe outcomesofacetabularfracturestreatedwithacutefixandreplaceversusopenreductionandinternalfixationinelderlypopulationamulticentricretrospectivestudy
AT scoscinadalila outcomesofacetabularfracturestreatedwithacutefixandreplaceversusopenreductionandinternalfixationinelderlypopulationamulticentricretrospectivestudy
AT demaurodomenico outcomesofacetabularfracturestreatedwithacutefixandreplaceversusopenreductionandinternalfixationinelderlypopulationamulticentricretrospectivestudy
AT erasmorocco outcomesofacetabularfracturestreatedwithacutefixandreplaceversusopenreductionandinternalfixationinelderlypopulationamulticentricretrospectivestudy
AT battiatoconcetto outcomesofacetabularfracturestreatedwithacutefixandreplaceversusopenreductionandinternalfixationinelderlypopulationamulticentricretrospectivestudy
AT maccaurogiulio outcomesofacetabularfracturestreatedwithacutefixandreplaceversusopenreductionandinternalfixationinelderlypopulationamulticentricretrospectivestudy
AT liuzzafrancesco outcomesofacetabularfracturestreatedwithacutefixandreplaceversusopenreductionandinternalfixationinelderlypopulationamulticentricretrospectivestudy