Cargando…
Multicellularity in animals: The potential for within-organism conflict
Metazoans function as individual organisms but also as “colonies” of cells whose single-celled ancestors lived and reproduced independently. Insights from evolutionary biology about multicellular group formation help us understand the behavior of cells: why they cooperate, and why cooperation someti...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35862435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120457119 |
_version_ | 1784767211644125184 |
---|---|
author | Howe, Jack Rink, Jochen C. Wang, Bo Griffin, Ashleigh S. |
author_facet | Howe, Jack Rink, Jochen C. Wang, Bo Griffin, Ashleigh S. |
author_sort | Howe, Jack |
collection | PubMed |
description | Metazoans function as individual organisms but also as “colonies” of cells whose single-celled ancestors lived and reproduced independently. Insights from evolutionary biology about multicellular group formation help us understand the behavior of cells: why they cooperate, and why cooperation sometimes breaks down. Current explanations for multicellularity focus on two aspects of development which promote cooperation and limit conflict among cells: a single-cell bottleneck, which creates organisms composed of clones, and a separation of somatic and germ cell lineages, which reduces the selective advantage of cheating. However, many obligately multicellular organisms thrive with neither, creating the potential for within-organism conflict. Here, we argue that the prevalence of such organisms throughout the Metazoa requires us to refine our preconceptions of conflict-free multicellularity. Evolutionary theory must incorporate developmental mechanisms across a broad range of organisms—such as unusual reproductive strategies, totipotency, and cell competition—while developmental biology must incorporate evolutionary principles. To facilitate this cross-disciplinary approach, we provide a conceptual overview from evolutionary biology for developmental biologists, using analogous examples in the well-studied social insects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9371690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93716902022-08-12 Multicellularity in animals: The potential for within-organism conflict Howe, Jack Rink, Jochen C. Wang, Bo Griffin, Ashleigh S. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Perspective Metazoans function as individual organisms but also as “colonies” of cells whose single-celled ancestors lived and reproduced independently. Insights from evolutionary biology about multicellular group formation help us understand the behavior of cells: why they cooperate, and why cooperation sometimes breaks down. Current explanations for multicellularity focus on two aspects of development which promote cooperation and limit conflict among cells: a single-cell bottleneck, which creates organisms composed of clones, and a separation of somatic and germ cell lineages, which reduces the selective advantage of cheating. However, many obligately multicellular organisms thrive with neither, creating the potential for within-organism conflict. Here, we argue that the prevalence of such organisms throughout the Metazoa requires us to refine our preconceptions of conflict-free multicellularity. Evolutionary theory must incorporate developmental mechanisms across a broad range of organisms—such as unusual reproductive strategies, totipotency, and cell competition—while developmental biology must incorporate evolutionary principles. To facilitate this cross-disciplinary approach, we provide a conceptual overview from evolutionary biology for developmental biologists, using analogous examples in the well-studied social insects. National Academy of Sciences 2022-07-21 2022-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9371690/ /pubmed/35862435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120457119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Perspective Howe, Jack Rink, Jochen C. Wang, Bo Griffin, Ashleigh S. Multicellularity in animals: The potential for within-organism conflict |
title | Multicellularity in animals: The potential for within-organism conflict |
title_full | Multicellularity in animals: The potential for within-organism conflict |
title_fullStr | Multicellularity in animals: The potential for within-organism conflict |
title_full_unstemmed | Multicellularity in animals: The potential for within-organism conflict |
title_short | Multicellularity in animals: The potential for within-organism conflict |
title_sort | multicellularity in animals: the potential for within-organism conflict |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35862435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120457119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT howejack multicellularityinanimalsthepotentialforwithinorganismconflict AT rinkjochenc multicellularityinanimalsthepotentialforwithinorganismconflict AT wangbo multicellularityinanimalsthepotentialforwithinorganismconflict AT griffinashleighs multicellularityinanimalsthepotentialforwithinorganismconflict |