Cargando…

Multicellularity in animals: The potential for within-organism conflict

Metazoans function as individual organisms but also as “colonies” of cells whose single-celled ancestors lived and reproduced independently. Insights from evolutionary biology about multicellular group formation help us understand the behavior of cells: why they cooperate, and why cooperation someti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howe, Jack, Rink, Jochen C., Wang, Bo, Griffin, Ashleigh S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35862435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120457119
_version_ 1784767211644125184
author Howe, Jack
Rink, Jochen C.
Wang, Bo
Griffin, Ashleigh S.
author_facet Howe, Jack
Rink, Jochen C.
Wang, Bo
Griffin, Ashleigh S.
author_sort Howe, Jack
collection PubMed
description Metazoans function as individual organisms but also as “colonies” of cells whose single-celled ancestors lived and reproduced independently. Insights from evolutionary biology about multicellular group formation help us understand the behavior of cells: why they cooperate, and why cooperation sometimes breaks down. Current explanations for multicellularity focus on two aspects of development which promote cooperation and limit conflict among cells: a single-cell bottleneck, which creates organisms composed of clones, and a separation of somatic and germ cell lineages, which reduces the selective advantage of cheating. However, many obligately multicellular organisms thrive with neither, creating the potential for within-organism conflict. Here, we argue that the prevalence of such organisms throughout the Metazoa requires us to refine our preconceptions of conflict-free multicellularity. Evolutionary theory must incorporate developmental mechanisms across a broad range of organisms—such as unusual reproductive strategies, totipotency, and cell competition—while developmental biology must incorporate evolutionary principles. To facilitate this cross-disciplinary approach, we provide a conceptual overview from evolutionary biology for developmental biologists, using analogous examples in the well-studied social insects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9371690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93716902022-08-12 Multicellularity in animals: The potential for within-organism conflict Howe, Jack Rink, Jochen C. Wang, Bo Griffin, Ashleigh S. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Perspective Metazoans function as individual organisms but also as “colonies” of cells whose single-celled ancestors lived and reproduced independently. Insights from evolutionary biology about multicellular group formation help us understand the behavior of cells: why they cooperate, and why cooperation sometimes breaks down. Current explanations for multicellularity focus on two aspects of development which promote cooperation and limit conflict among cells: a single-cell bottleneck, which creates organisms composed of clones, and a separation of somatic and germ cell lineages, which reduces the selective advantage of cheating. However, many obligately multicellular organisms thrive with neither, creating the potential for within-organism conflict. Here, we argue that the prevalence of such organisms throughout the Metazoa requires us to refine our preconceptions of conflict-free multicellularity. Evolutionary theory must incorporate developmental mechanisms across a broad range of organisms—such as unusual reproductive strategies, totipotency, and cell competition—while developmental biology must incorporate evolutionary principles. To facilitate this cross-disciplinary approach, we provide a conceptual overview from evolutionary biology for developmental biologists, using analogous examples in the well-studied social insects. National Academy of Sciences 2022-07-21 2022-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9371690/ /pubmed/35862435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120457119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Perspective
Howe, Jack
Rink, Jochen C.
Wang, Bo
Griffin, Ashleigh S.
Multicellularity in animals: The potential for within-organism conflict
title Multicellularity in animals: The potential for within-organism conflict
title_full Multicellularity in animals: The potential for within-organism conflict
title_fullStr Multicellularity in animals: The potential for within-organism conflict
title_full_unstemmed Multicellularity in animals: The potential for within-organism conflict
title_short Multicellularity in animals: The potential for within-organism conflict
title_sort multicellularity in animals: the potential for within-organism conflict
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35862435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120457119
work_keys_str_mv AT howejack multicellularityinanimalsthepotentialforwithinorganismconflict
AT rinkjochenc multicellularityinanimalsthepotentialforwithinorganismconflict
AT wangbo multicellularityinanimalsthepotentialforwithinorganismconflict
AT griffinashleighs multicellularityinanimalsthepotentialforwithinorganismconflict