Cargando…
Pivotal voting: The opportunity to tip group decisions skews juries and other voting outcomes
Many important social and policy decisions are made by small groups of people (e.g., juries, college admissions officers, or corporate boards) with the hope that a collective process will yield better and fairer decisions. In many instances, it is possible for these groups to fail to reach a decisio...
Autores principales: | Davenport, Diag, Winet, Yuji K. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35914134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108208119 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Universal vote-by-mail has no impact on partisan turnout or vote share
por: Thompson, Daniel M., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Wolf attacks predict far-right voting
por: Clemm von Hohenberg, Bernhard, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Voting paradoxes and group coherence: the condorcet efficiency of voting rules
por: Gehrlein, William V, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Hegemonic masculinity predicts 2016 and 2020 voting and candidate evaluations
por: Vescio, Theresa K., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Voting Systems for Environmental Decisions
por: BURGMAN, MARK A, et al.
Publicado: (2014)