Cargando…

Appropriateness of routine pre-endoscopic SARS-CoV-2 screening with RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals and its impact on delayed diagnosis

AIMS: Endoscopy units are considered to be at an increased risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2. Our aim is to assess the correlation between pre-endoscopic screening with reverse-transcription-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) in asymptomatic individuals scheduled for elective endoscopy and the epidemi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fortuny, Marta, Iborra, Ignacio, Gutiérrez-Rios, Laura, Calm, Anna, Vayreda, Eva, Puig, Maria, Aguilar, Ariadna, Caballero, Noemí, Marín, Ingrid, Colan-Hernández, Juan, Moreno de Vega, Vicente, Uchima, Hugo, Domènech, Eugeni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier España, S.L.U. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35964808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2022.07.005
_version_ 1784767230038245376
author Fortuny, Marta
Iborra, Ignacio
Gutiérrez-Rios, Laura
Calm, Anna
Vayreda, Eva
Puig, Maria
Aguilar, Ariadna
Caballero, Noemí
Marín, Ingrid
Colan-Hernández, Juan
Moreno de Vega, Vicente
Uchima, Hugo
Domènech, Eugeni
author_facet Fortuny, Marta
Iborra, Ignacio
Gutiérrez-Rios, Laura
Calm, Anna
Vayreda, Eva
Puig, Maria
Aguilar, Ariadna
Caballero, Noemí
Marín, Ingrid
Colan-Hernández, Juan
Moreno de Vega, Vicente
Uchima, Hugo
Domènech, Eugeni
author_sort Fortuny, Marta
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Endoscopy units are considered to be at an increased risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2. Our aim is to assess the correlation between pre-endoscopic screening with reverse-transcription-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) in asymptomatic individuals scheduled for elective endoscopy and the epidemiological data published by the local Health Administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational retrospective study collecting the results of our screening strategy spanning June/2020–June/2021, the effective potential growth (EPG), an index measuring the outbreak risk, and the 7 and 14-day cumulative incidence (CI). Indication, delay and the findings of the endoscopic examinations were registered for RT-PCR positive patients. RESULTS: A total of 5808 tests were performed, yielding 125 positive results (2.15%). All positive tests occurred in weeks of high/very high risk (EPG > 100) with the highest monthly rate being 9.36%, recorded in January/2021. A significant correlation (rho = 0.796; p < 0.001) between weekly positive rates and EPG was observed, and a significantly lower weekly number of positive tests was recorded when EPG < 100. Planning the screening strategy one week ahead according to EPG > 100 would have avoided up to 826 tests with only one positive result to account for. One hundred and thirteen individuals tested positive and 89 endoscopies were delayed. The most common findings were colon polyps, colorectal cancer and gastric metaplasia. Oncological diagnosis was delayed 50 ± 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: No positive RT-PCR test were registered out of high-risk periods. Epidemiological administrative data in the preceding two weeks showed a significant correlation with screening results and could be useful to plan pre-endoscopic screening and avoid unnecessary tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9371764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier España, S.L.U.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93717642022-08-12 Appropriateness of routine pre-endoscopic SARS-CoV-2 screening with RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals and its impact on delayed diagnosis Fortuny, Marta Iborra, Ignacio Gutiérrez-Rios, Laura Calm, Anna Vayreda, Eva Puig, Maria Aguilar, Ariadna Caballero, Noemí Marín, Ingrid Colan-Hernández, Juan Moreno de Vega, Vicente Uchima, Hugo Domènech, Eugeni Gastroenterol Hepatol Original Article AIMS: Endoscopy units are considered to be at an increased risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2. Our aim is to assess the correlation between pre-endoscopic screening with reverse-transcription-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) in asymptomatic individuals scheduled for elective endoscopy and the epidemiological data published by the local Health Administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational retrospective study collecting the results of our screening strategy spanning June/2020–June/2021, the effective potential growth (EPG), an index measuring the outbreak risk, and the 7 and 14-day cumulative incidence (CI). Indication, delay and the findings of the endoscopic examinations were registered for RT-PCR positive patients. RESULTS: A total of 5808 tests were performed, yielding 125 positive results (2.15%). All positive tests occurred in weeks of high/very high risk (EPG > 100) with the highest monthly rate being 9.36%, recorded in January/2021. A significant correlation (rho = 0.796; p < 0.001) between weekly positive rates and EPG was observed, and a significantly lower weekly number of positive tests was recorded when EPG < 100. Planning the screening strategy one week ahead according to EPG > 100 would have avoided up to 826 tests with only one positive result to account for. One hundred and thirteen individuals tested positive and 89 endoscopies were delayed. The most common findings were colon polyps, colorectal cancer and gastric metaplasia. Oncological diagnosis was delayed 50 ± 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: No positive RT-PCR test were registered out of high-risk periods. Epidemiological administrative data in the preceding two weeks showed a significant correlation with screening results and could be useful to plan pre-endoscopic screening and avoid unnecessary tests. Elsevier España, S.L.U. 2023-04 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9371764/ /pubmed/35964808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2022.07.005 Text en © 2022 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fortuny, Marta
Iborra, Ignacio
Gutiérrez-Rios, Laura
Calm, Anna
Vayreda, Eva
Puig, Maria
Aguilar, Ariadna
Caballero, Noemí
Marín, Ingrid
Colan-Hernández, Juan
Moreno de Vega, Vicente
Uchima, Hugo
Domènech, Eugeni
Appropriateness of routine pre-endoscopic SARS-CoV-2 screening with RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals and its impact on delayed diagnosis
title Appropriateness of routine pre-endoscopic SARS-CoV-2 screening with RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals and its impact on delayed diagnosis
title_full Appropriateness of routine pre-endoscopic SARS-CoV-2 screening with RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals and its impact on delayed diagnosis
title_fullStr Appropriateness of routine pre-endoscopic SARS-CoV-2 screening with RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals and its impact on delayed diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Appropriateness of routine pre-endoscopic SARS-CoV-2 screening with RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals and its impact on delayed diagnosis
title_short Appropriateness of routine pre-endoscopic SARS-CoV-2 screening with RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals and its impact on delayed diagnosis
title_sort appropriateness of routine pre-endoscopic sars-cov-2 screening with rt-pcr in asymptomatic individuals and its impact on delayed diagnosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35964808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2022.07.005
work_keys_str_mv AT fortunymarta appropriatenessofroutinepreendoscopicsarscov2screeningwithrtpcrinasymptomaticindividualsanditsimpactondelayeddiagnosis
AT iborraignacio appropriatenessofroutinepreendoscopicsarscov2screeningwithrtpcrinasymptomaticindividualsanditsimpactondelayeddiagnosis
AT gutierrezrioslaura appropriatenessofroutinepreendoscopicsarscov2screeningwithrtpcrinasymptomaticindividualsanditsimpactondelayeddiagnosis
AT calmanna appropriatenessofroutinepreendoscopicsarscov2screeningwithrtpcrinasymptomaticindividualsanditsimpactondelayeddiagnosis
AT vayredaeva appropriatenessofroutinepreendoscopicsarscov2screeningwithrtpcrinasymptomaticindividualsanditsimpactondelayeddiagnosis
AT puigmaria appropriatenessofroutinepreendoscopicsarscov2screeningwithrtpcrinasymptomaticindividualsanditsimpactondelayeddiagnosis
AT aguilarariadna appropriatenessofroutinepreendoscopicsarscov2screeningwithrtpcrinasymptomaticindividualsanditsimpactondelayeddiagnosis
AT caballeronoemi appropriatenessofroutinepreendoscopicsarscov2screeningwithrtpcrinasymptomaticindividualsanditsimpactondelayeddiagnosis
AT mariningrid appropriatenessofroutinepreendoscopicsarscov2screeningwithrtpcrinasymptomaticindividualsanditsimpactondelayeddiagnosis
AT colanhernandezjuan appropriatenessofroutinepreendoscopicsarscov2screeningwithrtpcrinasymptomaticindividualsanditsimpactondelayeddiagnosis
AT morenodevegavicente appropriatenessofroutinepreendoscopicsarscov2screeningwithrtpcrinasymptomaticindividualsanditsimpactondelayeddiagnosis
AT uchimahugo appropriatenessofroutinepreendoscopicsarscov2screeningwithrtpcrinasymptomaticindividualsanditsimpactondelayeddiagnosis
AT domenecheugeni appropriatenessofroutinepreendoscopicsarscov2screeningwithrtpcrinasymptomaticindividualsanditsimpactondelayeddiagnosis