Cargando…

Application Effect and Accuracy Analysis of Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay in the Serological Test of Hepatitis B Virus

OBJECTIVE: To explore the validity and accuracy of electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the serological detection of the hepatitis B virus. METHODS: From 6 February 2019 to 1 March 2020, 96 patients diagnosed with hepatitis B virus infection i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lian, Yifei, Fu, Hongran, Xu, Xiaoyi, Ju, Chuanyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9371497
_version_ 1784767250910150656
author Lian, Yifei
Fu, Hongran
Xu, Xiaoyi
Ju, Chuanyu
author_facet Lian, Yifei
Fu, Hongran
Xu, Xiaoyi
Ju, Chuanyu
author_sort Lian, Yifei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore the validity and accuracy of electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the serological detection of the hepatitis B virus. METHODS: From 6 February 2019 to 1 March 2020, 96 patients diagnosed with hepatitis B virus infection in our hospital were recruited and assigned at a ratio of 1 : 1 to experimental groups A (GA) and B (GB), with 48 cases in each group, and the five major serological indicators of hepatitis B were tested and analyzed using ECLIA and ELISA. In addition, 50 suspected patients were selected for two tests, respectively, to compare the accuracy of the two test methods. RESULTS: ECLIA was associated with significantly higher expression levels and higher detection rates of HBeAg, HBeAb, HBsAg, and HBsAb versus ELISA (P < 0.05), and the difference in the expression and detection rates of HBcAb levels between the two groups did not come up to the statistical standard (P > 0.05). ECLIA yielded significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than ELISA (P < 0.05), while the two methods showed comparable detection accuracy (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Despite the inconsistent results of the latest studies on the serological detection of hepatitis B by the two techniques, ECLIA is consistently superior to ELISA and provides better diagnostic benefits and merits promotion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9371851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93718512022-08-12 Application Effect and Accuracy Analysis of Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay in the Serological Test of Hepatitis B Virus Lian, Yifei Fu, Hongran Xu, Xiaoyi Ju, Chuanyu Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article OBJECTIVE: To explore the validity and accuracy of electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the serological detection of the hepatitis B virus. METHODS: From 6 February 2019 to 1 March 2020, 96 patients diagnosed with hepatitis B virus infection in our hospital were recruited and assigned at a ratio of 1 : 1 to experimental groups A (GA) and B (GB), with 48 cases in each group, and the five major serological indicators of hepatitis B were tested and analyzed using ECLIA and ELISA. In addition, 50 suspected patients were selected for two tests, respectively, to compare the accuracy of the two test methods. RESULTS: ECLIA was associated with significantly higher expression levels and higher detection rates of HBeAg, HBeAb, HBsAg, and HBsAb versus ELISA (P < 0.05), and the difference in the expression and detection rates of HBcAb levels between the two groups did not come up to the statistical standard (P > 0.05). ECLIA yielded significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than ELISA (P < 0.05), while the two methods showed comparable detection accuracy (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Despite the inconsistent results of the latest studies on the serological detection of hepatitis B by the two techniques, ECLIA is consistently superior to ELISA and provides better diagnostic benefits and merits promotion. Hindawi 2022-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9371851/ /pubmed/35966724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9371497 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yifei Lian et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lian, Yifei
Fu, Hongran
Xu, Xiaoyi
Ju, Chuanyu
Application Effect and Accuracy Analysis of Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay in the Serological Test of Hepatitis B Virus
title Application Effect and Accuracy Analysis of Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay in the Serological Test of Hepatitis B Virus
title_full Application Effect and Accuracy Analysis of Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay in the Serological Test of Hepatitis B Virus
title_fullStr Application Effect and Accuracy Analysis of Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay in the Serological Test of Hepatitis B Virus
title_full_unstemmed Application Effect and Accuracy Analysis of Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay in the Serological Test of Hepatitis B Virus
title_short Application Effect and Accuracy Analysis of Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay in the Serological Test of Hepatitis B Virus
title_sort application effect and accuracy analysis of electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in the serological test of hepatitis b virus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9371851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/9371497
work_keys_str_mv AT lianyifei applicationeffectandaccuracyanalysisofelectrochemiluminescenceimmunoassayandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayintheserologicaltestofhepatitisbvirus
AT fuhongran applicationeffectandaccuracyanalysisofelectrochemiluminescenceimmunoassayandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayintheserologicaltestofhepatitisbvirus
AT xuxiaoyi applicationeffectandaccuracyanalysisofelectrochemiluminescenceimmunoassayandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayintheserologicaltestofhepatitisbvirus
AT juchuanyu applicationeffectandaccuracyanalysisofelectrochemiluminescenceimmunoassayandenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassayintheserologicaltestofhepatitisbvirus