Cargando…

Evaluation of auto-segmentation for EBRT planning structures using deep learning-based workflow on cervical cancer

Deep learning (DL) based approach aims to construct a full workflow solution for cervical cancer with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of EBRT planning structures derived from DL based auto-segmentation compared wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jiahao, Chen, Yuanyuan, Xie, Hongling, Luo, Lumeng, Tang, Qiu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18084-0
_version_ 1784767303432273920
author Wang, Jiahao
Chen, Yuanyuan
Xie, Hongling
Luo, Lumeng
Tang, Qiu
author_facet Wang, Jiahao
Chen, Yuanyuan
Xie, Hongling
Luo, Lumeng
Tang, Qiu
author_sort Wang, Jiahao
collection PubMed
description Deep learning (DL) based approach aims to construct a full workflow solution for cervical cancer with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of EBRT planning structures derived from DL based auto-segmentation compared with standard manual delineation. Auto-segmentation model based on convolutional neural networks (CNN) was developed to delineate clinical target volumes (CTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) in cervical cancer radiotherapy. A total of 300 retrospective patients from multiple cancer centers were used to train and validate the model, and 75 independent cases were selected as testing data. The accuracy of auto-segmented contours were evaluated using geometric and dosimetric metrics including dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% hausdorff distance (95%HD), jaccard coefficient (JC) and dose-volume index (DVI). The correlation between geometric metrics and dosimetric difference was performed by Spearman’s correlation analysis. The right and left kidney, bladder, right and left femoral head showed superior geometric accuracy (DSC: 0.88–0.93; 95%HD: 1.03 mm–2.96 mm; JC: 0.78–0.88), and the Bland–Altman test obtained dose agreement for these contours (P > 0.05) between manual and DL based methods. Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test indicated significant dosimetric differences in CTV, spinal cord and pelvic bone (P < 0.001). A strong correlation between the mean dose of pelvic bone and its 95%HD (R = 0.843, P < 0.001) was found in Spearman’s correlation analysis, and the remaining structures showed weak link between dosimetric difference and all of geometric metrics. Our auto-segmentation achieved a satisfied agreement for most EBRT planning structures, although the clinical acceptance of CTV was a concern. DL based auto-segmentation was an essential component in cervical cancer workflow which would generate the accurate contouring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9372087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93720872022-08-13 Evaluation of auto-segmentation for EBRT planning structures using deep learning-based workflow on cervical cancer Wang, Jiahao Chen, Yuanyuan Xie, Hongling Luo, Lumeng Tang, Qiu Sci Rep Article Deep learning (DL) based approach aims to construct a full workflow solution for cervical cancer with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of EBRT planning structures derived from DL based auto-segmentation compared with standard manual delineation. Auto-segmentation model based on convolutional neural networks (CNN) was developed to delineate clinical target volumes (CTVs) and organs at risk (OARs) in cervical cancer radiotherapy. A total of 300 retrospective patients from multiple cancer centers were used to train and validate the model, and 75 independent cases were selected as testing data. The accuracy of auto-segmented contours were evaluated using geometric and dosimetric metrics including dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% hausdorff distance (95%HD), jaccard coefficient (JC) and dose-volume index (DVI). The correlation between geometric metrics and dosimetric difference was performed by Spearman’s correlation analysis. The right and left kidney, bladder, right and left femoral head showed superior geometric accuracy (DSC: 0.88–0.93; 95%HD: 1.03 mm–2.96 mm; JC: 0.78–0.88), and the Bland–Altman test obtained dose agreement for these contours (P > 0.05) between manual and DL based methods. Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test indicated significant dosimetric differences in CTV, spinal cord and pelvic bone (P < 0.001). A strong correlation between the mean dose of pelvic bone and its 95%HD (R = 0.843, P < 0.001) was found in Spearman’s correlation analysis, and the remaining structures showed weak link between dosimetric difference and all of geometric metrics. Our auto-segmentation achieved a satisfied agreement for most EBRT planning structures, although the clinical acceptance of CTV was a concern. DL based auto-segmentation was an essential component in cervical cancer workflow which would generate the accurate contouring. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9372087/ /pubmed/35953516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18084-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Jiahao
Chen, Yuanyuan
Xie, Hongling
Luo, Lumeng
Tang, Qiu
Evaluation of auto-segmentation for EBRT planning structures using deep learning-based workflow on cervical cancer
title Evaluation of auto-segmentation for EBRT planning structures using deep learning-based workflow on cervical cancer
title_full Evaluation of auto-segmentation for EBRT planning structures using deep learning-based workflow on cervical cancer
title_fullStr Evaluation of auto-segmentation for EBRT planning structures using deep learning-based workflow on cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of auto-segmentation for EBRT planning structures using deep learning-based workflow on cervical cancer
title_short Evaluation of auto-segmentation for EBRT planning structures using deep learning-based workflow on cervical cancer
title_sort evaluation of auto-segmentation for ebrt planning structures using deep learning-based workflow on cervical cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18084-0
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjiahao evaluationofautosegmentationforebrtplanningstructuresusingdeeplearningbasedworkflowoncervicalcancer
AT chenyuanyuan evaluationofautosegmentationforebrtplanningstructuresusingdeeplearningbasedworkflowoncervicalcancer
AT xiehongling evaluationofautosegmentationforebrtplanningstructuresusingdeeplearningbasedworkflowoncervicalcancer
AT luolumeng evaluationofautosegmentationforebrtplanningstructuresusingdeeplearningbasedworkflowoncervicalcancer
AT tangqiu evaluationofautosegmentationforebrtplanningstructuresusingdeeplearningbasedworkflowoncervicalcancer