Cargando…

The effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene

Bilayer borophene has recently attracted much interest due to its outstanding mechanical and electronic properties. The interlayer interactions of these bilayers are reported differently in theoretical and experimental studies. Herein, we design and investigate bilayer [Formula: see text] borophene,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mozvashi, Shobair Mohammadi, Givi, Mojde Rezaee, Tagani, Meysam Bagheri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18076-0
_version_ 1784767315959611392
author Mozvashi, Shobair Mohammadi
Givi, Mojde Rezaee
Tagani, Meysam Bagheri
author_facet Mozvashi, Shobair Mohammadi
Givi, Mojde Rezaee
Tagani, Meysam Bagheri
author_sort Mozvashi, Shobair Mohammadi
collection PubMed
description Bilayer borophene has recently attracted much interest due to its outstanding mechanical and electronic properties. The interlayer interactions of these bilayers are reported differently in theoretical and experimental studies. Herein, we design and investigate bilayer [Formula: see text] borophene, by first-principles calculations. Our results show that the interlayer distance of the relaxed AA-stacked bilayer is about 2.5 Å, suggesting a van der Waals interlayer interaction. However, this is not supported by previous experiments, therefore by constraining the interlayer distance, we propose a preferred model which is close to experimental records. This preferred model has one covalent interlayer bond in every unit cell (single-pillar). Further, we argue that the preferred model is nothing but the relaxed model under a 2% compression. Additionally, we designed three substrate-supported bilayers on the Ag, Al, and Au substrates, which lead to double-pillar structures. Afterward, we investigate the AB stacking, which forms covalent bonds in the relaxed form, without the need for compression or substrate. Moreover, phonon dispersion shows that, unlike the AA stacking, the AB stacking is stable in freestanding form. Subsequently, we calculate the mechanical properties of the AA and AB stackings. The ultimate strengths of the AA and the AB stackings are 29.72 N/m at 12% strain and 23.18 N/m at 8% strain, respectively. Moreover, the calculated Young’s moduli are 419 N/m and 356 N/m for the AA and the AB stackings, respectively. These results show the superiority of bilayer borophene over bilayer [Formula: see text] in terms of stiffness and compliance. Our results can pave the way of future studies on bilayer borophene structures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9372144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93721442022-08-13 The effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene Mozvashi, Shobair Mohammadi Givi, Mojde Rezaee Tagani, Meysam Bagheri Sci Rep Article Bilayer borophene has recently attracted much interest due to its outstanding mechanical and electronic properties. The interlayer interactions of these bilayers are reported differently in theoretical and experimental studies. Herein, we design and investigate bilayer [Formula: see text] borophene, by first-principles calculations. Our results show that the interlayer distance of the relaxed AA-stacked bilayer is about 2.5 Å, suggesting a van der Waals interlayer interaction. However, this is not supported by previous experiments, therefore by constraining the interlayer distance, we propose a preferred model which is close to experimental records. This preferred model has one covalent interlayer bond in every unit cell (single-pillar). Further, we argue that the preferred model is nothing but the relaxed model under a 2% compression. Additionally, we designed three substrate-supported bilayers on the Ag, Al, and Au substrates, which lead to double-pillar structures. Afterward, we investigate the AB stacking, which forms covalent bonds in the relaxed form, without the need for compression or substrate. Moreover, phonon dispersion shows that, unlike the AA stacking, the AB stacking is stable in freestanding form. Subsequently, we calculate the mechanical properties of the AA and AB stackings. The ultimate strengths of the AA and the AB stackings are 29.72 N/m at 12% strain and 23.18 N/m at 8% strain, respectively. Moreover, the calculated Young’s moduli are 419 N/m and 356 N/m for the AA and the AB stackings, respectively. These results show the superiority of bilayer borophene over bilayer [Formula: see text] in terms of stiffness and compliance. Our results can pave the way of future studies on bilayer borophene structures. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9372144/ /pubmed/35953694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18076-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Mozvashi, Shobair Mohammadi
Givi, Mojde Rezaee
Tagani, Meysam Bagheri
The effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene
title The effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene
title_full The effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene
title_fullStr The effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene
title_full_unstemmed The effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene
title_short The effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene
title_sort effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18076-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mozvashishobairmohammadi theeffectsofsubstrateandstackinginbilayerborophene
AT givimojderezaee theeffectsofsubstrateandstackinginbilayerborophene
AT taganimeysambagheri theeffectsofsubstrateandstackinginbilayerborophene
AT mozvashishobairmohammadi effectsofsubstrateandstackinginbilayerborophene
AT givimojderezaee effectsofsubstrateandstackinginbilayerborophene
AT taganimeysambagheri effectsofsubstrateandstackinginbilayerborophene