Cargando…
The effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene
Bilayer borophene has recently attracted much interest due to its outstanding mechanical and electronic properties. The interlayer interactions of these bilayers are reported differently in theoretical and experimental studies. Herein, we design and investigate bilayer [Formula: see text] borophene,...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18076-0 |
_version_ | 1784767315959611392 |
---|---|
author | Mozvashi, Shobair Mohammadi Givi, Mojde Rezaee Tagani, Meysam Bagheri |
author_facet | Mozvashi, Shobair Mohammadi Givi, Mojde Rezaee Tagani, Meysam Bagheri |
author_sort | Mozvashi, Shobair Mohammadi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bilayer borophene has recently attracted much interest due to its outstanding mechanical and electronic properties. The interlayer interactions of these bilayers are reported differently in theoretical and experimental studies. Herein, we design and investigate bilayer [Formula: see text] borophene, by first-principles calculations. Our results show that the interlayer distance of the relaxed AA-stacked bilayer is about 2.5 Å, suggesting a van der Waals interlayer interaction. However, this is not supported by previous experiments, therefore by constraining the interlayer distance, we propose a preferred model which is close to experimental records. This preferred model has one covalent interlayer bond in every unit cell (single-pillar). Further, we argue that the preferred model is nothing but the relaxed model under a 2% compression. Additionally, we designed three substrate-supported bilayers on the Ag, Al, and Au substrates, which lead to double-pillar structures. Afterward, we investigate the AB stacking, which forms covalent bonds in the relaxed form, without the need for compression or substrate. Moreover, phonon dispersion shows that, unlike the AA stacking, the AB stacking is stable in freestanding form. Subsequently, we calculate the mechanical properties of the AA and AB stackings. The ultimate strengths of the AA and the AB stackings are 29.72 N/m at 12% strain and 23.18 N/m at 8% strain, respectively. Moreover, the calculated Young’s moduli are 419 N/m and 356 N/m for the AA and the AB stackings, respectively. These results show the superiority of bilayer borophene over bilayer [Formula: see text] in terms of stiffness and compliance. Our results can pave the way of future studies on bilayer borophene structures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9372144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93721442022-08-13 The effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene Mozvashi, Shobair Mohammadi Givi, Mojde Rezaee Tagani, Meysam Bagheri Sci Rep Article Bilayer borophene has recently attracted much interest due to its outstanding mechanical and electronic properties. The interlayer interactions of these bilayers are reported differently in theoretical and experimental studies. Herein, we design and investigate bilayer [Formula: see text] borophene, by first-principles calculations. Our results show that the interlayer distance of the relaxed AA-stacked bilayer is about 2.5 Å, suggesting a van der Waals interlayer interaction. However, this is not supported by previous experiments, therefore by constraining the interlayer distance, we propose a preferred model which is close to experimental records. This preferred model has one covalent interlayer bond in every unit cell (single-pillar). Further, we argue that the preferred model is nothing but the relaxed model under a 2% compression. Additionally, we designed three substrate-supported bilayers on the Ag, Al, and Au substrates, which lead to double-pillar structures. Afterward, we investigate the AB stacking, which forms covalent bonds in the relaxed form, without the need for compression or substrate. Moreover, phonon dispersion shows that, unlike the AA stacking, the AB stacking is stable in freestanding form. Subsequently, we calculate the mechanical properties of the AA and AB stackings. The ultimate strengths of the AA and the AB stackings are 29.72 N/m at 12% strain and 23.18 N/m at 8% strain, respectively. Moreover, the calculated Young’s moduli are 419 N/m and 356 N/m for the AA and the AB stackings, respectively. These results show the superiority of bilayer borophene over bilayer [Formula: see text] in terms of stiffness and compliance. Our results can pave the way of future studies on bilayer borophene structures. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9372144/ /pubmed/35953694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18076-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Mozvashi, Shobair Mohammadi Givi, Mojde Rezaee Tagani, Meysam Bagheri The effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene |
title | The effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene |
title_full | The effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene |
title_fullStr | The effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene |
title_short | The effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene |
title_sort | effects of substrate and stacking in bilayer borophene |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35953694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18076-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mozvashishobairmohammadi theeffectsofsubstrateandstackinginbilayerborophene AT givimojderezaee theeffectsofsubstrateandstackinginbilayerborophene AT taganimeysambagheri theeffectsofsubstrateandstackinginbilayerborophene AT mozvashishobairmohammadi effectsofsubstrateandstackinginbilayerborophene AT givimojderezaee effectsofsubstrateandstackinginbilayerborophene AT taganimeysambagheri effectsofsubstrateandstackinginbilayerborophene |