Cargando…

A detailed analysis of lymph node recurrence in endometrial carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The lymph node (LN) is one of the main sites of recurrence in patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC). Literature specifically analyzing LN recurrence (LNR) in EC remains limited in number. METHODS: Patients with EC undergoing surgery between 2006 and 2021 in Peking University People’s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, He, Dong, Yangyang, Dai, Yibo, Wang, Zhiqi, Wang, Jianliu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966308
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-2588
_version_ 1784767331029745664
author Li, He
Dong, Yangyang
Dai, Yibo
Wang, Zhiqi
Wang, Jianliu
author_facet Li, He
Dong, Yangyang
Dai, Yibo
Wang, Zhiqi
Wang, Jianliu
author_sort Li, He
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The lymph node (LN) is one of the main sites of recurrence in patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC). Literature specifically analyzing LN recurrence (LNR) in EC remains limited in number. METHODS: Patients with EC undergoing surgery between 2006 and 2021 in Peking University People’s Hospital was included, clinicopathological data of whom were collected and analyzed retrospectively by R 4.0.3. RESULTS: A total of 792 patients were included, with 73 patients having recurrence, among whom 21 patients had LNR. Median recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with LNR was 16 [4–39] months. LNR was extensive, with pelvic LNs most commonly involved (9/21). There are various patterns of LNR, with 33.3% (7/21) LN-only recurrence. Multivariable analysis suggested advanced stage, larger tumor diameter and poor histology were independent risk factors for LNR. Patients with LN metastasis (LNM) diagnosed at initial treatment accounted for 47.6% (10/21) of cases with LNR, 60.0% (6/10) of whom had recurrent LNs beyond the region of LNM, 90.0% (9/10) of whom had recurrence nodes overlapping with the range of lymphadenectomy. Uni- and multi-variable analysis suggested lymphadenectomy was not a protective factor for LNR, with both the range and number of LNs harvested considered. CONCLUSIONS: LNR is common in patients with EC, with an extensive range and various patterns of recurrence. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, tumor diameter and histology were independent risk factors for LNR, but lymphadenectomy seemed not a protective factor for LNR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9372211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93722112022-08-13 A detailed analysis of lymph node recurrence in endometrial carcinoma Li, He Dong, Yangyang Dai, Yibo Wang, Zhiqi Wang, Jianliu Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The lymph node (LN) is one of the main sites of recurrence in patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC). Literature specifically analyzing LN recurrence (LNR) in EC remains limited in number. METHODS: Patients with EC undergoing surgery between 2006 and 2021 in Peking University People’s Hospital was included, clinicopathological data of whom were collected and analyzed retrospectively by R 4.0.3. RESULTS: A total of 792 patients were included, with 73 patients having recurrence, among whom 21 patients had LNR. Median recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with LNR was 16 [4–39] months. LNR was extensive, with pelvic LNs most commonly involved (9/21). There are various patterns of LNR, with 33.3% (7/21) LN-only recurrence. Multivariable analysis suggested advanced stage, larger tumor diameter and poor histology were independent risk factors for LNR. Patients with LN metastasis (LNM) diagnosed at initial treatment accounted for 47.6% (10/21) of cases with LNR, 60.0% (6/10) of whom had recurrent LNs beyond the region of LNM, 90.0% (9/10) of whom had recurrence nodes overlapping with the range of lymphadenectomy. Uni- and multi-variable analysis suggested lymphadenectomy was not a protective factor for LNR, with both the range and number of LNs harvested considered. CONCLUSIONS: LNR is common in patients with EC, with an extensive range and various patterns of recurrence. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, tumor diameter and histology were independent risk factors for LNR, but lymphadenectomy seemed not a protective factor for LNR. AME Publishing Company 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9372211/ /pubmed/35966308 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-2588 Text en 2022 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, He
Dong, Yangyang
Dai, Yibo
Wang, Zhiqi
Wang, Jianliu
A detailed analysis of lymph node recurrence in endometrial carcinoma
title A detailed analysis of lymph node recurrence in endometrial carcinoma
title_full A detailed analysis of lymph node recurrence in endometrial carcinoma
title_fullStr A detailed analysis of lymph node recurrence in endometrial carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed A detailed analysis of lymph node recurrence in endometrial carcinoma
title_short A detailed analysis of lymph node recurrence in endometrial carcinoma
title_sort detailed analysis of lymph node recurrence in endometrial carcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966308
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-2588
work_keys_str_mv AT lihe adetailedanalysisoflymphnoderecurrenceinendometrialcarcinoma
AT dongyangyang adetailedanalysisoflymphnoderecurrenceinendometrialcarcinoma
AT daiyibo adetailedanalysisoflymphnoderecurrenceinendometrialcarcinoma
AT wangzhiqi adetailedanalysisoflymphnoderecurrenceinendometrialcarcinoma
AT wangjianliu adetailedanalysisoflymphnoderecurrenceinendometrialcarcinoma
AT lihe detailedanalysisoflymphnoderecurrenceinendometrialcarcinoma
AT dongyangyang detailedanalysisoflymphnoderecurrenceinendometrialcarcinoma
AT daiyibo detailedanalysisoflymphnoderecurrenceinendometrialcarcinoma
AT wangzhiqi detailedanalysisoflymphnoderecurrenceinendometrialcarcinoma
AT wangjianliu detailedanalysisoflymphnoderecurrenceinendometrialcarcinoma