Development and validation of endoplasmic reticulum stress-related eight-gene signature for predicting the overall survival of lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: The high case-fatality rate of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) emphasizes the importance of identifying a robust and reliable prognostic signature for LUAD patients. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress results from protein misfolding imbalance and has been shown to participate in the development of cancer. We aimed to develop and validation a reliable and robust ER stress-related prognostic signature to accurately predict prognosis for patients with LUAD. METHODS: The mRNA expressions data and the clinical information were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) as training set. The data of external validation sets were downloaded from GEO database with the accession number GSE 30219, GSE 31210, GSE 50081 and GSE 37745. Univariate Cox regression analyses was performed to identify mRNAs associated with overall survival (OS) in LUAD. ER-associated genes were retrieved using GeneCards database. Next, we construct the best risk score model by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression with tenfold cross-validation. Subsequently, predictive models and risk scores were developed in the TCGA training dataset. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for univariate and multivariate analysis of risk score and clinicopathologic characteristics. As a validation set GSE30219, GSE31210 and (GSE50081+GSE37745) were used to validate the predictive performance of the model in TCGA. Finally, functional enrichment analysis, including the gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis, the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) signaling pathways and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were performed to further explore function and mechanisms. RESULTS: A prognostic prediction model based on eight genes was developed in the TCGA training dataset. As expected, in validation sets, patients with higher risk scores were found to have worse prognosis. Time-dependent ROC curve analyses demonstrated that the risk score model was reliable. The nomograms showed excellent predictive ability. Multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that the risk score was an independent prognostic factor for LUAD. Additionally, functional enrichment analysis showed that the relevant biomarkers were enriched in cell cycle and glycolysis related signaling pathways. CONCLUSIONS: The 8-gene signature may enable improved the prediction of clinical events and decisions about management of LUAD.