Cargando…

Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes between invasive IPMN and invasive MCN: A population-based analysis

BACKGROUND: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) and mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) are two main histological subtypes of pancreatic cystic neoplasms with rapidly increasing incidence recently. The natural histories, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes of invasive IPMN and invasive M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Zhen, Shi, Guangjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35965523
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.899761
_version_ 1784767344783917056
author Yang, Zhen
Shi, Guangjun
author_facet Yang, Zhen
Shi, Guangjun
author_sort Yang, Zhen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) and mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) are two main histological subtypes of pancreatic cystic neoplasms with rapidly increasing incidence recently. The natural histories, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes of invasive IPMN and invasive MCN have not been well explored. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of invasive IPMN and invasive MCN in the SEER database from 2000 through 2018 were retrospectively identified. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was conducted to determine the independent risk factors associated with overall survival (OS). Subgroup analyses of survival outcomes for invasive IPMN and invasive MCN were conducted. The OS for invasive IPMN was compared between patients who underwent surgery alone and those who received surgery plus chemotherapy by propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: A total of 2,505 patients were included, of whom 2,300 were diagnosed with invasive IPMN and 205 were diagnosed with invasive MCN. Half of the invasive IPMN (48.4%) and three-quarters of the invasive MCN (76.1%) patients were female. Of all patients, both the OS and cancer-specific survival were significantly better in the invasive MCN cohort compared to the invasive IPMN cohort. In subgroup analyses, while invasive MCN experienced better OS compared to invasive IPMN in the subgroups of patients with local–regional disease, the survival advantages disappeared in patients at a distant stage. In addition, surgery plus chemotherapy in invasive IPMN patients was associated with significantly better survival compared to surgery alone after PSM. CONCLUSION: We examined the demographic and clinical characteristics between invasive IPMN and invasive MCN patients using a large-population-based analysis. Although the OS is significantly better for invasive MCN versus invasive IPMN, the difference disappeared in patients with distant disease. A combination of surgery and chemotherapy in selected invasive IPMN patients could confer survival benefits compared to surgery alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9372276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93722762022-08-13 Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes between invasive IPMN and invasive MCN: A population-based analysis Yang, Zhen Shi, Guangjun Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) and mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) are two main histological subtypes of pancreatic cystic neoplasms with rapidly increasing incidence recently. The natural histories, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes of invasive IPMN and invasive MCN have not been well explored. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of invasive IPMN and invasive MCN in the SEER database from 2000 through 2018 were retrospectively identified. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was conducted to determine the independent risk factors associated with overall survival (OS). Subgroup analyses of survival outcomes for invasive IPMN and invasive MCN were conducted. The OS for invasive IPMN was compared between patients who underwent surgery alone and those who received surgery plus chemotherapy by propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: A total of 2,505 patients were included, of whom 2,300 were diagnosed with invasive IPMN and 205 were diagnosed with invasive MCN. Half of the invasive IPMN (48.4%) and three-quarters of the invasive MCN (76.1%) patients were female. Of all patients, both the OS and cancer-specific survival were significantly better in the invasive MCN cohort compared to the invasive IPMN cohort. In subgroup analyses, while invasive MCN experienced better OS compared to invasive IPMN in the subgroups of patients with local–regional disease, the survival advantages disappeared in patients at a distant stage. In addition, surgery plus chemotherapy in invasive IPMN patients was associated with significantly better survival compared to surgery alone after PSM. CONCLUSION: We examined the demographic and clinical characteristics between invasive IPMN and invasive MCN patients using a large-population-based analysis. Although the OS is significantly better for invasive MCN versus invasive IPMN, the difference disappeared in patients with distant disease. A combination of surgery and chemotherapy in selected invasive IPMN patients could confer survival benefits compared to surgery alone. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9372276/ /pubmed/35965523 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.899761 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yang and Shi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Yang, Zhen
Shi, Guangjun
Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes between invasive IPMN and invasive MCN: A population-based analysis
title Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes between invasive IPMN and invasive MCN: A population-based analysis
title_full Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes between invasive IPMN and invasive MCN: A population-based analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes between invasive IPMN and invasive MCN: A population-based analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes between invasive IPMN and invasive MCN: A population-based analysis
title_short Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes between invasive IPMN and invasive MCN: A population-based analysis
title_sort comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes between invasive ipmn and invasive mcn: a population-based analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35965523
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.899761
work_keys_str_mv AT yangzhen comparisonofclinicopathologiccharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesbetweeninvasiveipmnandinvasivemcnapopulationbasedanalysis
AT shiguangjun comparisonofclinicopathologiccharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesbetweeninvasiveipmnandinvasivemcnapopulationbasedanalysis