Cargando…

Reliability and validity of the Mental Health Self-management Questionnaire among Chinese patients with mood and anxiety disorders

BACKGROUND: Self-management plays an important role in promoting and restoring mental health for individuals with mental health issues. However, there is no valid and reliable Chinese tool assessing the self-management behaviors of people with mood and anxiety disorders. This study aimed to develop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Mengmeng, Wang, Jingjun, Wang, Ya, Huang, Xia, Huang, Yalin, Huang, Junqiang, Feng, Yan, Li, Xiaolin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966465
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.952951
_version_ 1784767358945984512
author Wang, Mengmeng
Wang, Jingjun
Wang, Ya
Huang, Xia
Huang, Yalin
Huang, Junqiang
Feng, Yan
Li, Xiaolin
author_facet Wang, Mengmeng
Wang, Jingjun
Wang, Ya
Huang, Xia
Huang, Yalin
Huang, Junqiang
Feng, Yan
Li, Xiaolin
author_sort Wang, Mengmeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Self-management plays an important role in promoting and restoring mental health for individuals with mental health issues. However, there is no valid and reliable Chinese tool assessing the self-management behaviors of people with mood and anxiety disorders. This study aimed to develop a Chinese version of the Mental Health Self-management Questionnaire (MHSQ-C) and to verify its psychometric properties. METHODS: A total of 440 potential participants were recruited by convenience sampling from June to August 2020. Item analysis and analyses of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, construct validity and criterion validity were performed. RESULTS: Data from 326 participants were used. Three factors obtained via principal component analysis and varimax rotation explained 53.68% of the total variance. The average content validity index was 0.99. The Cronbach’s α coefficient (total: 0.874, clinical: 0.706, empowerment: 0.818, vitality: 0.830) and test-retest reliability (ICC: total: 0.783, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.616, 0.882], clinical: 0.525, 95% CI [0.240, 0.725], empowerment: 0.786, 95% CI [0.622, 0.884], vitality: 0.748, 95% CI [0.564, 0.862]) were good. The MHSQ-C was well correlated with the Partners in Health scale and showed no floor or ceiling effect. DISCUSSION: The MHSQ-C is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate the self-management strategies of patients with mood and anxiety disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9372341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93723412022-08-13 Reliability and validity of the Mental Health Self-management Questionnaire among Chinese patients with mood and anxiety disorders Wang, Mengmeng Wang, Jingjun Wang, Ya Huang, Xia Huang, Yalin Huang, Junqiang Feng, Yan Li, Xiaolin Front Psychiatry Psychiatry BACKGROUND: Self-management plays an important role in promoting and restoring mental health for individuals with mental health issues. However, there is no valid and reliable Chinese tool assessing the self-management behaviors of people with mood and anxiety disorders. This study aimed to develop a Chinese version of the Mental Health Self-management Questionnaire (MHSQ-C) and to verify its psychometric properties. METHODS: A total of 440 potential participants were recruited by convenience sampling from June to August 2020. Item analysis and analyses of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, construct validity and criterion validity were performed. RESULTS: Data from 326 participants were used. Three factors obtained via principal component analysis and varimax rotation explained 53.68% of the total variance. The average content validity index was 0.99. The Cronbach’s α coefficient (total: 0.874, clinical: 0.706, empowerment: 0.818, vitality: 0.830) and test-retest reliability (ICC: total: 0.783, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.616, 0.882], clinical: 0.525, 95% CI [0.240, 0.725], empowerment: 0.786, 95% CI [0.622, 0.884], vitality: 0.748, 95% CI [0.564, 0.862]) were good. The MHSQ-C was well correlated with the Partners in Health scale and showed no floor or ceiling effect. DISCUSSION: The MHSQ-C is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate the self-management strategies of patients with mood and anxiety disorders. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9372341/ /pubmed/35966465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.952951 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Wang, Wang, Huang, Huang, Huang, Feng and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Wang, Mengmeng
Wang, Jingjun
Wang, Ya
Huang, Xia
Huang, Yalin
Huang, Junqiang
Feng, Yan
Li, Xiaolin
Reliability and validity of the Mental Health Self-management Questionnaire among Chinese patients with mood and anxiety disorders
title Reliability and validity of the Mental Health Self-management Questionnaire among Chinese patients with mood and anxiety disorders
title_full Reliability and validity of the Mental Health Self-management Questionnaire among Chinese patients with mood and anxiety disorders
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of the Mental Health Self-management Questionnaire among Chinese patients with mood and anxiety disorders
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of the Mental Health Self-management Questionnaire among Chinese patients with mood and anxiety disorders
title_short Reliability and validity of the Mental Health Self-management Questionnaire among Chinese patients with mood and anxiety disorders
title_sort reliability and validity of the mental health self-management questionnaire among chinese patients with mood and anxiety disorders
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966465
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.952951
work_keys_str_mv AT wangmengmeng reliabilityandvalidityofthementalhealthselfmanagementquestionnaireamongchinesepatientswithmoodandanxietydisorders
AT wangjingjun reliabilityandvalidityofthementalhealthselfmanagementquestionnaireamongchinesepatientswithmoodandanxietydisorders
AT wangya reliabilityandvalidityofthementalhealthselfmanagementquestionnaireamongchinesepatientswithmoodandanxietydisorders
AT huangxia reliabilityandvalidityofthementalhealthselfmanagementquestionnaireamongchinesepatientswithmoodandanxietydisorders
AT huangyalin reliabilityandvalidityofthementalhealthselfmanagementquestionnaireamongchinesepatientswithmoodandanxietydisorders
AT huangjunqiang reliabilityandvalidityofthementalhealthselfmanagementquestionnaireamongchinesepatientswithmoodandanxietydisorders
AT fengyan reliabilityandvalidityofthementalhealthselfmanagementquestionnaireamongchinesepatientswithmoodandanxietydisorders
AT lixiaolin reliabilityandvalidityofthementalhealthselfmanagementquestionnaireamongchinesepatientswithmoodandanxietydisorders