Cargando…

Asking questions that matter – Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials

Implantable neurotechnology devices such as Brain Computer Interfaces (BCIs) and Deep Brain Stimulators (DBS) are an increasing part of treating or exploring potential treatments for neurological and psychiatric disorders. While only a few devices are approved, many promising prospects for future de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schönau, Andreas, Goering, Sara, Versalovic, Erika, Montes, Natalia, Brown, Tim, Dasgupta, Ishan, Klein, Eran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966997
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.983226
_version_ 1784767362093809664
author Schönau, Andreas
Goering, Sara
Versalovic, Erika
Montes, Natalia
Brown, Tim
Dasgupta, Ishan
Klein, Eran
author_facet Schönau, Andreas
Goering, Sara
Versalovic, Erika
Montes, Natalia
Brown, Tim
Dasgupta, Ishan
Klein, Eran
author_sort Schönau, Andreas
collection PubMed
description Implantable neurotechnology devices such as Brain Computer Interfaces (BCIs) and Deep Brain Stimulators (DBS) are an increasing part of treating or exploring potential treatments for neurological and psychiatric disorders. While only a few devices are approved, many promising prospects for future devices are under investigation. The decision to participate in a clinical trial can be challenging, given a variety of risks to be taken into consideration. During the consent process, prospective participants might lack the language to consider those risks, feel unprepared, or simply not know what questions to ask. One tool to help empower participants to play a more active role during the consent process is a Question Prompt List (QPL). QPLs are communication tools that can prompt participants and patients to articulate potential concerns. They offer a structured list of disease, treatment, or research intervention-specific questions that research participants can use as support for question asking. While QPLs have been studied as tools for improving the consent process during cancer treatment, in this paper, we suggest they would be helpful in neurotechnology research, and offer an example of a QPL as a template for an informed consent tool in neurotechnology device trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9372354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93723542022-08-13 Asking questions that matter – Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials Schönau, Andreas Goering, Sara Versalovic, Erika Montes, Natalia Brown, Tim Dasgupta, Ishan Klein, Eran Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience Implantable neurotechnology devices such as Brain Computer Interfaces (BCIs) and Deep Brain Stimulators (DBS) are an increasing part of treating or exploring potential treatments for neurological and psychiatric disorders. While only a few devices are approved, many promising prospects for future devices are under investigation. The decision to participate in a clinical trial can be challenging, given a variety of risks to be taken into consideration. During the consent process, prospective participants might lack the language to consider those risks, feel unprepared, or simply not know what questions to ask. One tool to help empower participants to play a more active role during the consent process is a Question Prompt List (QPL). QPLs are communication tools that can prompt participants and patients to articulate potential concerns. They offer a structured list of disease, treatment, or research intervention-specific questions that research participants can use as support for question asking. While QPLs have been studied as tools for improving the consent process during cancer treatment, in this paper, we suggest they would be helpful in neurotechnology research, and offer an example of a QPL as a template for an informed consent tool in neurotechnology device trials. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9372354/ /pubmed/35966997 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.983226 Text en Copyright © 2022 Schönau, Goering, Versalovic, Montes, Brown, Dasgupta and Klein. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Human Neuroscience
Schönau, Andreas
Goering, Sara
Versalovic, Erika
Montes, Natalia
Brown, Tim
Dasgupta, Ishan
Klein, Eran
Asking questions that matter – Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials
title Asking questions that matter – Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials
title_full Asking questions that matter – Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials
title_fullStr Asking questions that matter – Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Asking questions that matter – Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials
title_short Asking questions that matter – Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials
title_sort asking questions that matter – question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials
topic Human Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966997
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.983226
work_keys_str_mv AT schonauandreas askingquestionsthatmatterquestionpromptlistsastoolsforimprovingtheconsentprocessforneurotechnologyclinicaltrials
AT goeringsara askingquestionsthatmatterquestionpromptlistsastoolsforimprovingtheconsentprocessforneurotechnologyclinicaltrials
AT versalovicerika askingquestionsthatmatterquestionpromptlistsastoolsforimprovingtheconsentprocessforneurotechnologyclinicaltrials
AT montesnatalia askingquestionsthatmatterquestionpromptlistsastoolsforimprovingtheconsentprocessforneurotechnologyclinicaltrials
AT browntim askingquestionsthatmatterquestionpromptlistsastoolsforimprovingtheconsentprocessforneurotechnologyclinicaltrials
AT dasguptaishan askingquestionsthatmatterquestionpromptlistsastoolsforimprovingtheconsentprocessforneurotechnologyclinicaltrials
AT kleineran askingquestionsthatmatterquestionpromptlistsastoolsforimprovingtheconsentprocessforneurotechnologyclinicaltrials