Cargando…
Asking questions that matter – Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials
Implantable neurotechnology devices such as Brain Computer Interfaces (BCIs) and Deep Brain Stimulators (DBS) are an increasing part of treating or exploring potential treatments for neurological and psychiatric disorders. While only a few devices are approved, many promising prospects for future de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966997 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.983226 |
_version_ | 1784767362093809664 |
---|---|
author | Schönau, Andreas Goering, Sara Versalovic, Erika Montes, Natalia Brown, Tim Dasgupta, Ishan Klein, Eran |
author_facet | Schönau, Andreas Goering, Sara Versalovic, Erika Montes, Natalia Brown, Tim Dasgupta, Ishan Klein, Eran |
author_sort | Schönau, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Implantable neurotechnology devices such as Brain Computer Interfaces (BCIs) and Deep Brain Stimulators (DBS) are an increasing part of treating or exploring potential treatments for neurological and psychiatric disorders. While only a few devices are approved, many promising prospects for future devices are under investigation. The decision to participate in a clinical trial can be challenging, given a variety of risks to be taken into consideration. During the consent process, prospective participants might lack the language to consider those risks, feel unprepared, or simply not know what questions to ask. One tool to help empower participants to play a more active role during the consent process is a Question Prompt List (QPL). QPLs are communication tools that can prompt participants and patients to articulate potential concerns. They offer a structured list of disease, treatment, or research intervention-specific questions that research participants can use as support for question asking. While QPLs have been studied as tools for improving the consent process during cancer treatment, in this paper, we suggest they would be helpful in neurotechnology research, and offer an example of a QPL as a template for an informed consent tool in neurotechnology device trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9372354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93723542022-08-13 Asking questions that matter – Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials Schönau, Andreas Goering, Sara Versalovic, Erika Montes, Natalia Brown, Tim Dasgupta, Ishan Klein, Eran Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience Implantable neurotechnology devices such as Brain Computer Interfaces (BCIs) and Deep Brain Stimulators (DBS) are an increasing part of treating or exploring potential treatments for neurological and psychiatric disorders. While only a few devices are approved, many promising prospects for future devices are under investigation. The decision to participate in a clinical trial can be challenging, given a variety of risks to be taken into consideration. During the consent process, prospective participants might lack the language to consider those risks, feel unprepared, or simply not know what questions to ask. One tool to help empower participants to play a more active role during the consent process is a Question Prompt List (QPL). QPLs are communication tools that can prompt participants and patients to articulate potential concerns. They offer a structured list of disease, treatment, or research intervention-specific questions that research participants can use as support for question asking. While QPLs have been studied as tools for improving the consent process during cancer treatment, in this paper, we suggest they would be helpful in neurotechnology research, and offer an example of a QPL as a template for an informed consent tool in neurotechnology device trials. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9372354/ /pubmed/35966997 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.983226 Text en Copyright © 2022 Schönau, Goering, Versalovic, Montes, Brown, Dasgupta and Klein. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Human Neuroscience Schönau, Andreas Goering, Sara Versalovic, Erika Montes, Natalia Brown, Tim Dasgupta, Ishan Klein, Eran Asking questions that matter – Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials |
title | Asking questions that matter – Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials |
title_full | Asking questions that matter – Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Asking questions that matter – Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Asking questions that matter – Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials |
title_short | Asking questions that matter – Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials |
title_sort | asking questions that matter – question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials |
topic | Human Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35966997 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.983226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schonauandreas askingquestionsthatmatterquestionpromptlistsastoolsforimprovingtheconsentprocessforneurotechnologyclinicaltrials AT goeringsara askingquestionsthatmatterquestionpromptlistsastoolsforimprovingtheconsentprocessforneurotechnologyclinicaltrials AT versalovicerika askingquestionsthatmatterquestionpromptlistsastoolsforimprovingtheconsentprocessforneurotechnologyclinicaltrials AT montesnatalia askingquestionsthatmatterquestionpromptlistsastoolsforimprovingtheconsentprocessforneurotechnologyclinicaltrials AT browntim askingquestionsthatmatterquestionpromptlistsastoolsforimprovingtheconsentprocessforneurotechnologyclinicaltrials AT dasguptaishan askingquestionsthatmatterquestionpromptlistsastoolsforimprovingtheconsentprocessforneurotechnologyclinicaltrials AT kleineran askingquestionsthatmatterquestionpromptlistsastoolsforimprovingtheconsentprocessforneurotechnologyclinicaltrials |