Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Ablation Combined with Left Atrial Appendage Closure in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage closure is effective in treating atrial fibrillation. However, the effectiveness of this combined treatment compared with catheter ablation alone is still controversial. METHODS: We searched studies in databases, including The Cochran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, An, Jiang, Jingbo, Xie, Zhitao, Zhong, Guoqiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Society of Cardiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35346901
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2021.766
_version_ 1784767393473495040
author Wang, An
Jiang, Jingbo
Xie, Zhitao
Zhong, Guoqiang
author_facet Wang, An
Jiang, Jingbo
Xie, Zhitao
Zhong, Guoqiang
author_sort Wang, An
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage closure is effective in treating atrial fibrillation. However, the effectiveness of this combined treatment compared with catheter ablation alone is still controversial. METHODS: We searched studies in databases, including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, that compared catheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage closure and catheter ablation alone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. These studies reported at least one of the following outcomes: the freedom from atrial arrhythmia rate, the procedure time, the fluoroscopy time, perioperative complications, thromboembolic events, and bleeding events during follow-up. The risk ratio and standard mean difference with 95% CI were analyzed by the random-effects model. RESULTS: Five studies involving 699 people were included in our meta-analysis. We found no significant difference in the freedom from atrial arrhythmia rate (risk ratio = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.83-1.04, I(2) = 0%, P = .21) between the 2 groups. Catheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage closure showed significantly longer procedure and fluoroscopy times than catheter ablation alone (standard mean difference = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.85-1.67, P < .00001 and standard mean difference = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.53-1.85, P = .0004, respectively). With regard to safety outcomes, no significant differences were observed in perioperative complications (RR = 1.62, 95% CI = 0.99-2.63, I(2) = 0%, P = .05), thromboembolic events (RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.15-3.11, I(2) = 0%, P = .61), or bleeding events (RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.11-3.88, P = .65) between the 2 groups during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The freedom from atrial arrhythmia rate and safety outcomes of catheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage closure are similar to those of catheter ablation alone. Catheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage closure appears to have longer procedure and fluoroscopy times than catheter ablation alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9372482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Turkish Society of Cardiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93724822022-08-15 Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Ablation Combined with Left Atrial Appendage Closure in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Wang, An Jiang, Jingbo Xie, Zhitao Zhong, Guoqiang Anatol J Cardiol Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage closure is effective in treating atrial fibrillation. However, the effectiveness of this combined treatment compared with catheter ablation alone is still controversial. METHODS: We searched studies in databases, including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, that compared catheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage closure and catheter ablation alone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. These studies reported at least one of the following outcomes: the freedom from atrial arrhythmia rate, the procedure time, the fluoroscopy time, perioperative complications, thromboembolic events, and bleeding events during follow-up. The risk ratio and standard mean difference with 95% CI were analyzed by the random-effects model. RESULTS: Five studies involving 699 people were included in our meta-analysis. We found no significant difference in the freedom from atrial arrhythmia rate (risk ratio = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.83-1.04, I(2) = 0%, P = .21) between the 2 groups. Catheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage closure showed significantly longer procedure and fluoroscopy times than catheter ablation alone (standard mean difference = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.85-1.67, P < .00001 and standard mean difference = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.53-1.85, P = .0004, respectively). With regard to safety outcomes, no significant differences were observed in perioperative complications (RR = 1.62, 95% CI = 0.99-2.63, I(2) = 0%, P = .05), thromboembolic events (RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.15-3.11, I(2) = 0%, P = .61), or bleeding events (RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.11-3.88, P = .65) between the 2 groups during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The freedom from atrial arrhythmia rate and safety outcomes of catheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage closure are similar to those of catheter ablation alone. Catheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage closure appears to have longer procedure and fluoroscopy times than catheter ablation alone. Turkish Society of Cardiology 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9372482/ /pubmed/35346901 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2021.766 Text en © Copyright 2022 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Wang, An
Jiang, Jingbo
Xie, Zhitao
Zhong, Guoqiang
Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Ablation Combined with Left Atrial Appendage Closure in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Ablation Combined with Left Atrial Appendage Closure in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Ablation Combined with Left Atrial Appendage Closure in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Ablation Combined with Left Atrial Appendage Closure in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Ablation Combined with Left Atrial Appendage Closure in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Ablation Combined with Left Atrial Appendage Closure in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of catheter ablation combined with left atrial appendage closure in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35346901
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2021.766
work_keys_str_mv AT wangan efficacyandsafetyofcatheterablationcombinedwithleftatrialappendageclosureinthetreatmentofatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiangjingbo efficacyandsafetyofcatheterablationcombinedwithleftatrialappendageclosureinthetreatmentofatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiezhitao efficacyandsafetyofcatheterablationcombinedwithleftatrialappendageclosureinthetreatmentofatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhongguoqiang efficacyandsafetyofcatheterablationcombinedwithleftatrialappendageclosureinthetreatmentofatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis