Cargando…

Comparison of efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and open enucleation for liver hemangioma in the right hemi liver: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Open enucleation (OE) is often performed for giant liver hemangioma (LH) because of its advantage in maximum preservation of functional liver parenchyma. Laparoscopic enucleation (LE) has been applied to LHs more frequently for its potential advantages in postoperative recovery and blood...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Haidong, Zhou, Ruiquan, Liu, Liguo, Si, Shuang, Sun, Yongliang, Xu, Li, Liu, Xiaolei, Yang, Zhiying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35965786
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-3074
_version_ 1784767436723060736
author Tan, Haidong
Zhou, Ruiquan
Liu, Liguo
Si, Shuang
Sun, Yongliang
Xu, Li
Liu, Xiaolei
Yang, Zhiying
author_facet Tan, Haidong
Zhou, Ruiquan
Liu, Liguo
Si, Shuang
Sun, Yongliang
Xu, Li
Liu, Xiaolei
Yang, Zhiying
author_sort Tan, Haidong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Open enucleation (OE) is often performed for giant liver hemangioma (LH) because of its advantage in maximum preservation of functional liver parenchyma. Laparoscopic enucleation (LE) has been applied to LHs more frequently for its potential advantages in postoperative recovery and blood loss. However, to date, LE is still a difficult and complex surgical technique especially when the hemangioma is located in the right hemi liver. The aim of this study was to analyze whether LE is superior to OE for LH in the right hemi liver. METHODS: Demographics and perioperative data of patients who underwent LE or OE for LH in the right hemi liver between May 2013 and July 2020 were collected. To decrease the selection bias, patients who underwent OE in first 2 years and those underwent LE in next 5 years by a same operation team were included. The data of sex, age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, largest tumor size, and removed tumor number were enrolled in the propensity score matching (PSM) method to compensate for differences in the baseline characteristics between LE and OE groups. The perioperative outcomes were compared between 2 matched groups after PSM method. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients (36 LE vs. 74 OE) were matched by age, sex, BMI, ASA grade score, largest tumor size, removed tumor number and tumor location. Finally, 34 patients in each group were retained after PSM. There were no significant differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, amount of autologous transfusion, morbidity grade and the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) on postoperative day 1 or 3 or 5. LE was associated with a significantly higher rate of use of the Pringle maneuver (P<0.001), shorter time to oral feeding (P<0.001) and shorter postoperative length of stay (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For LHs in the right hemi liver, the perioperative safety of LE is not inferior to OE, and LE seems to achieves a faster recovery from surgery compared with OE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9372665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93726652022-08-13 Comparison of efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and open enucleation for liver hemangioma in the right hemi liver: a retrospective cohort study Tan, Haidong Zhou, Ruiquan Liu, Liguo Si, Shuang Sun, Yongliang Xu, Li Liu, Xiaolei Yang, Zhiying Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Open enucleation (OE) is often performed for giant liver hemangioma (LH) because of its advantage in maximum preservation of functional liver parenchyma. Laparoscopic enucleation (LE) has been applied to LHs more frequently for its potential advantages in postoperative recovery and blood loss. However, to date, LE is still a difficult and complex surgical technique especially when the hemangioma is located in the right hemi liver. The aim of this study was to analyze whether LE is superior to OE for LH in the right hemi liver. METHODS: Demographics and perioperative data of patients who underwent LE or OE for LH in the right hemi liver between May 2013 and July 2020 were collected. To decrease the selection bias, patients who underwent OE in first 2 years and those underwent LE in next 5 years by a same operation team were included. The data of sex, age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, largest tumor size, and removed tumor number were enrolled in the propensity score matching (PSM) method to compensate for differences in the baseline characteristics between LE and OE groups. The perioperative outcomes were compared between 2 matched groups after PSM method. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients (36 LE vs. 74 OE) were matched by age, sex, BMI, ASA grade score, largest tumor size, removed tumor number and tumor location. Finally, 34 patients in each group were retained after PSM. There were no significant differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, amount of autologous transfusion, morbidity grade and the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) on postoperative day 1 or 3 or 5. LE was associated with a significantly higher rate of use of the Pringle maneuver (P<0.001), shorter time to oral feeding (P<0.001) and shorter postoperative length of stay (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For LHs in the right hemi liver, the perioperative safety of LE is not inferior to OE, and LE seems to achieves a faster recovery from surgery compared with OE. AME Publishing Company 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9372665/ /pubmed/35965786 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-3074 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Tan, Haidong
Zhou, Ruiquan
Liu, Liguo
Si, Shuang
Sun, Yongliang
Xu, Li
Liu, Xiaolei
Yang, Zhiying
Comparison of efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and open enucleation for liver hemangioma in the right hemi liver: a retrospective cohort study
title Comparison of efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and open enucleation for liver hemangioma in the right hemi liver: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Comparison of efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and open enucleation for liver hemangioma in the right hemi liver: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Comparison of efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and open enucleation for liver hemangioma in the right hemi liver: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and open enucleation for liver hemangioma in the right hemi liver: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Comparison of efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and open enucleation for liver hemangioma in the right hemi liver: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort comparison of efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and open enucleation for liver hemangioma in the right hemi liver: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35965786
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-3074
work_keys_str_mv AT tanhaidong comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoflaparoscopicandopenenucleationforliverhemangiomaintherighthemiliveraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhouruiquan comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoflaparoscopicandopenenucleationforliverhemangiomaintherighthemiliveraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liuliguo comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoflaparoscopicandopenenucleationforliverhemangiomaintherighthemiliveraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT sishuang comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoflaparoscopicandopenenucleationforliverhemangiomaintherighthemiliveraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT sunyongliang comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoflaparoscopicandopenenucleationforliverhemangiomaintherighthemiliveraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT xuli comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoflaparoscopicandopenenucleationforliverhemangiomaintherighthemiliveraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liuxiaolei comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoflaparoscopicandopenenucleationforliverhemangiomaintherighthemiliveraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yangzhiying comparisonofefficacyandsafetyoflaparoscopicandopenenucleationforliverhemangiomaintherighthemiliveraretrospectivecohortstudy