Cargando…
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of hysteroscopic electric resection versus vaginal surgery in the treatment of uterine scar defects after cesarean section
BACKGROUND: Cesarean sections are increasingly likely to be applied; however, uterine scar defects (USD) often remain after delivery. The two existing treatment methods, hysteroscopic electric resection and vaginal surgery, are still controversial in terms of efficacy and safety. So, this paper to c...
Autores principales: | Yuan, Yongxing, Gao, Jianjian, Wang, Jing, Hu, Xi, Liu, Ping, Wang, Hailin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35965788 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-2916 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Vaginal Repair of Cesarean Scar Defect under Hysteroscopic Guidance
por: Li, K. T. Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Vaginal repair of cesarean section scar defects: Preoperative hysteroscopic evaluation
por: Chen, Huihui, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Laparoscopic Operation Under Hysteroscopic Guidance in Management of Cesarean Scar Defect
por: Dinh, Hoang The, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Role of collateral embolization in addition to uterine artery embolization followed by hysteroscopic curettage for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy
por: Zhang, Guodong, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus hysteroscopic approach in patients with previous cesarean scar defect: a retrospective cohort study
por: Zhang, Qi, et al.
Publicado: (2021)