Cargando…
Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy
Endoscopic ultrasound guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) has emerged as a minimally-invasive alternative to the traditional (percutaneous or transjugular) liver biopsy techniques for the diagnosis of liver parenchymal diseases. Po-tentially, EUS-LB combines the advantages of percutaneous and transjugular...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36161047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i28.3586 |
_version_ | 1784767465315631104 |
---|---|
author | Rangwani, Shiva Ardeshna, Devarshi R Mumtaz, Khalid Kelly, Sean G Han, Samuel Y Krishna, Somashekar G |
author_facet | Rangwani, Shiva Ardeshna, Devarshi R Mumtaz, Khalid Kelly, Sean G Han, Samuel Y Krishna, Somashekar G |
author_sort | Rangwani, Shiva |
collection | PubMed |
description | Endoscopic ultrasound guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) has emerged as a minimally-invasive alternative to the traditional (percutaneous or transjugular) liver biopsy techniques for the diagnosis of liver parenchymal diseases. Po-tentially, EUS-LB combines the advantages of percutaneous and transjugular liver biopsy in addressing focused sampling in addition to measuring portal pressure. Additionally, EUS-LB facilitates access to both the lobes of the liver which is not considered with the traditional percutaneous liver biopsy. Multiple studies have compared EUS-LB with conventional liver biopsy and reported comparable diagnostic yield, increased acquisition of complete portal tracts, and longer specimen length as compared to the traditional approaches. EUS-LB is associated with lesser post-procedural pain and shorter recovery time, while providing lower risk of complications when compared to traditional liver biopsy. Innovations in needle types, needle sizes and suction techniques have aimed at further optimizing the EUS-LB technique. This review article updates current literature with focus on the variations in the technique and equipment used for EUS-LB, and compares EUS-LB with traditional methods of liver biopsy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9372801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93728012022-09-23 Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy Rangwani, Shiva Ardeshna, Devarshi R Mumtaz, Khalid Kelly, Sean G Han, Samuel Y Krishna, Somashekar G World J Gastroenterol Minireviews Endoscopic ultrasound guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) has emerged as a minimally-invasive alternative to the traditional (percutaneous or transjugular) liver biopsy techniques for the diagnosis of liver parenchymal diseases. Po-tentially, EUS-LB combines the advantages of percutaneous and transjugular liver biopsy in addressing focused sampling in addition to measuring portal pressure. Additionally, EUS-LB facilitates access to both the lobes of the liver which is not considered with the traditional percutaneous liver biopsy. Multiple studies have compared EUS-LB with conventional liver biopsy and reported comparable diagnostic yield, increased acquisition of complete portal tracts, and longer specimen length as compared to the traditional approaches. EUS-LB is associated with lesser post-procedural pain and shorter recovery time, while providing lower risk of complications when compared to traditional liver biopsy. Innovations in needle types, needle sizes and suction techniques have aimed at further optimizing the EUS-LB technique. This review article updates current literature with focus on the variations in the technique and equipment used for EUS-LB, and compares EUS-LB with traditional methods of liver biopsy. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-07-28 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9372801/ /pubmed/36161047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i28.3586 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Minireviews Rangwani, Shiva Ardeshna, Devarshi R Mumtaz, Khalid Kelly, Sean G Han, Samuel Y Krishna, Somashekar G Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy |
title | Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy |
title_full | Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy |
title_fullStr | Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy |
title_full_unstemmed | Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy |
title_short | Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy |
title_sort | update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy |
topic | Minireviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36161047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i28.3586 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rangwanishiva updateonendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsy AT ardeshnadevarshir updateonendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsy AT mumtazkhalid updateonendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsy AT kellyseang updateonendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsy AT hansamuely updateonendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsy AT krishnasomashekarg updateonendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsy |