Cargando…

Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy

Endoscopic ultrasound guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) has emerged as a minimally-invasive alternative to the traditional (percutaneous or transjugular) liver biopsy techniques for the diagnosis of liver parenchymal diseases. Po-tentially, EUS-LB combines the advantages of percutaneous and transjugular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rangwani, Shiva, Ardeshna, Devarshi R, Mumtaz, Khalid, Kelly, Sean G, Han, Samuel Y, Krishna, Somashekar G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36161047
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i28.3586
_version_ 1784767465315631104
author Rangwani, Shiva
Ardeshna, Devarshi R
Mumtaz, Khalid
Kelly, Sean G
Han, Samuel Y
Krishna, Somashekar G
author_facet Rangwani, Shiva
Ardeshna, Devarshi R
Mumtaz, Khalid
Kelly, Sean G
Han, Samuel Y
Krishna, Somashekar G
author_sort Rangwani, Shiva
collection PubMed
description Endoscopic ultrasound guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) has emerged as a minimally-invasive alternative to the traditional (percutaneous or transjugular) liver biopsy techniques for the diagnosis of liver parenchymal diseases. Po-tentially, EUS-LB combines the advantages of percutaneous and transjugular liver biopsy in addressing focused sampling in addition to measuring portal pressure. Additionally, EUS-LB facilitates access to both the lobes of the liver which is not considered with the traditional percutaneous liver biopsy. Multiple studies have compared EUS-LB with conventional liver biopsy and reported comparable diagnostic yield, increased acquisition of complete portal tracts, and longer specimen length as compared to the traditional approaches. EUS-LB is associated with lesser post-procedural pain and shorter recovery time, while providing lower risk of complications when compared to traditional liver biopsy. Innovations in needle types, needle sizes and suction techniques have aimed at further optimizing the EUS-LB technique. This review article updates current literature with focus on the variations in the technique and equipment used for EUS-LB, and compares EUS-LB with traditional methods of liver biopsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9372801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93728012022-09-23 Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy Rangwani, Shiva Ardeshna, Devarshi R Mumtaz, Khalid Kelly, Sean G Han, Samuel Y Krishna, Somashekar G World J Gastroenterol Minireviews Endoscopic ultrasound guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) has emerged as a minimally-invasive alternative to the traditional (percutaneous or transjugular) liver biopsy techniques for the diagnosis of liver parenchymal diseases. Po-tentially, EUS-LB combines the advantages of percutaneous and transjugular liver biopsy in addressing focused sampling in addition to measuring portal pressure. Additionally, EUS-LB facilitates access to both the lobes of the liver which is not considered with the traditional percutaneous liver biopsy. Multiple studies have compared EUS-LB with conventional liver biopsy and reported comparable diagnostic yield, increased acquisition of complete portal tracts, and longer specimen length as compared to the traditional approaches. EUS-LB is associated with lesser post-procedural pain and shorter recovery time, while providing lower risk of complications when compared to traditional liver biopsy. Innovations in needle types, needle sizes and suction techniques have aimed at further optimizing the EUS-LB technique. This review article updates current literature with focus on the variations in the technique and equipment used for EUS-LB, and compares EUS-LB with traditional methods of liver biopsy. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-07-28 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9372801/ /pubmed/36161047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i28.3586 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Minireviews
Rangwani, Shiva
Ardeshna, Devarshi R
Mumtaz, Khalid
Kelly, Sean G
Han, Samuel Y
Krishna, Somashekar G
Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy
title Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy
title_full Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy
title_fullStr Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy
title_full_unstemmed Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy
title_short Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy
title_sort update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy
topic Minireviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36161047
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i28.3586
work_keys_str_mv AT rangwanishiva updateonendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsy
AT ardeshnadevarshir updateonendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsy
AT mumtazkhalid updateonendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsy
AT kellyseang updateonendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsy
AT hansamuely updateonendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsy
AT krishnasomashekarg updateonendoscopicultrasoundguidedliverbiopsy