Cargando…

Developing and validating a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease quick screening questionnaire using statistical learning models

BACKGROUND: Active targeted case-finding is a cost-effective way to identify individuals with high-risk for early diagnosis and interventions of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A precise and practical COPD screening instrument is needed in health care settings. METHODS: We created four...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xiaoyue, He, Hong, Xu, Liang, Chen, Cuicui, Zhang, Jieqing, Li, Na, Chen, Xianxian, Jiang, Weipeng, Li, Li, Wang, Linlin, Song, Yuanlin, Xiao, Jing, Zhang, Jun, Hou, Dongni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35943965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14799731221116585
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Active targeted case-finding is a cost-effective way to identify individuals with high-risk for early diagnosis and interventions of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A precise and practical COPD screening instrument is needed in health care settings. METHODS: We created four statistical learning models to predict the risk of COPD using a multi-center randomized cross-sectional survey database (n = 5281). The minimal set of predictors and the best statistical learning model in identifying individuals with airway obstruction were selected to construct a new case-finding questionnaire. We validated its performance in a prospective cohort (n = 958) and compared it with three previously reported case-finding instruments. RESULTS: A set of seven predictors was selected from 643 variables, including age, morning productive cough, wheeze, years of smoking cessation, gender, job, and pack-year of smoking. In four statistical learning models, generalized additive model model had the highest area under curve (AUC) value both on the developing cross-sectional data set (AUC = 0.813) and the prospective validation data set (AUC = 0.880). Our questionnaire outperforms the other three tools on the cross-sectional validation data set. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a COPD case-finding questionnaire, which is an efficient and cost-effective tool for identifying high-risk population of COPD.