Cargando…

Clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial()

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epidural Volume Extension (EVE) involves instillation of normal saline into the epidural space soon after an intrathecal injection, with the aim to augment the sensory block height. Its clinical relevance lies in the possibility of using reduced intrathecal dose and yet ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tyagi, Asha, Ramanujam, Mukundan, Sethi, Ashok Kumar, Mohta, Medha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33712249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2020.12.005
_version_ 1784767584062668800
author Tyagi, Asha
Ramanujam, Mukundan
Sethi, Ashok Kumar
Mohta, Medha
author_facet Tyagi, Asha
Ramanujam, Mukundan
Sethi, Ashok Kumar
Mohta, Medha
author_sort Tyagi, Asha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epidural Volume Extension (EVE) involves instillation of normal saline into the epidural space soon after an intrathecal injection, with the aim to augment the sensory block height. Its clinical relevance lies in the possibility of using reduced intrathecal dose and yet achieving the desired sensory block level. Intrathecal dose is a known determinant of the level of sensory block. Whether EVE is dependent on intrathecal dose is not known. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blind study to compare the maximum sensory level (S(max)) achieved with or without application of EVE to two different reduced intrathecal doses. Eighty four adult male patients of ASA status I or II with body weight between 50–70 kg and height in the range of 150–180 cm, scheduled for orthopedic lower limb surgery using combined spinal epidural anesthesia were randomized to receive, either intrathecal dose (5 or 8 mg) with or without EVE, in accordance to group allocation. RESULTS: S(max) was lowered by application of EVE to 5 mg intrathecal bupivacaine (T(8.9) ± 4.3 vs. T(6.4) ± 1.9 with and without EVE respectively; p = 0.030). S(max) was similar when EVE was applied to 8 mg intrathecal bupivacaine than without it (T(5.8) ± 1.8 vs. T(6.4) ± 2.2 respectively; p =  0.324). CONCLUSION: EVE should not be applied to 5 mg plain bupivacaine during a combined spinal epidural block in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery as it may result in a decrease in the maximum sensory level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9373371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93733712022-08-15 Clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial() Tyagi, Asha Ramanujam, Mukundan Sethi, Ashok Kumar Mohta, Medha Braz J Anesthesiol Clinical Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epidural Volume Extension (EVE) involves instillation of normal saline into the epidural space soon after an intrathecal injection, with the aim to augment the sensory block height. Its clinical relevance lies in the possibility of using reduced intrathecal dose and yet achieving the desired sensory block level. Intrathecal dose is a known determinant of the level of sensory block. Whether EVE is dependent on intrathecal dose is not known. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blind study to compare the maximum sensory level (S(max)) achieved with or without application of EVE to two different reduced intrathecal doses. Eighty four adult male patients of ASA status I or II with body weight between 50–70 kg and height in the range of 150–180 cm, scheduled for orthopedic lower limb surgery using combined spinal epidural anesthesia were randomized to receive, either intrathecal dose (5 or 8 mg) with or without EVE, in accordance to group allocation. RESULTS: S(max) was lowered by application of EVE to 5 mg intrathecal bupivacaine (T(8.9) ± 4.3 vs. T(6.4) ± 1.9 with and without EVE respectively; p = 0.030). S(max) was similar when EVE was applied to 8 mg intrathecal bupivacaine than without it (T(5.8) ± 1.8 vs. T(6.4) ± 2.2 respectively; p =  0.324). CONCLUSION: EVE should not be applied to 5 mg plain bupivacaine during a combined spinal epidural block in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery as it may result in a decrease in the maximum sensory level. Elsevier 2020-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9373371/ /pubmed/33712249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2020.12.005 Text en © 2020 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Tyagi, Asha
Ramanujam, Mukundan
Sethi, Ashok Kumar
Mohta, Medha
Clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial()
title Clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial()
title_full Clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial()
title_fullStr Clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial()
title_full_unstemmed Clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial()
title_short Clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial()
title_sort clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial()
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33712249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2020.12.005
work_keys_str_mv AT tyagiasha clinicalutilityofepiduralvolumeextensionfollowingreducedintrathecaldosesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ramanujammukundan clinicalutilityofepiduralvolumeextensionfollowingreducedintrathecaldosesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sethiashokkumar clinicalutilityofepiduralvolumeextensionfollowingreducedintrathecaldosesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mohtamedha clinicalutilityofepiduralvolumeextensionfollowingreducedintrathecaldosesarandomizedcontrolledtrial