Cargando…
Clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial()
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epidural Volume Extension (EVE) involves instillation of normal saline into the epidural space soon after an intrathecal injection, with the aim to augment the sensory block height. Its clinical relevance lies in the possibility of using reduced intrathecal dose and yet ac...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33712249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2020.12.005 |
_version_ | 1784767584062668800 |
---|---|
author | Tyagi, Asha Ramanujam, Mukundan Sethi, Ashok Kumar Mohta, Medha |
author_facet | Tyagi, Asha Ramanujam, Mukundan Sethi, Ashok Kumar Mohta, Medha |
author_sort | Tyagi, Asha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epidural Volume Extension (EVE) involves instillation of normal saline into the epidural space soon after an intrathecal injection, with the aim to augment the sensory block height. Its clinical relevance lies in the possibility of using reduced intrathecal dose and yet achieving the desired sensory block level. Intrathecal dose is a known determinant of the level of sensory block. Whether EVE is dependent on intrathecal dose is not known. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blind study to compare the maximum sensory level (S(max)) achieved with or without application of EVE to two different reduced intrathecal doses. Eighty four adult male patients of ASA status I or II with body weight between 50–70 kg and height in the range of 150–180 cm, scheduled for orthopedic lower limb surgery using combined spinal epidural anesthesia were randomized to receive, either intrathecal dose (5 or 8 mg) with or without EVE, in accordance to group allocation. RESULTS: S(max) was lowered by application of EVE to 5 mg intrathecal bupivacaine (T(8.9) ± 4.3 vs. T(6.4) ± 1.9 with and without EVE respectively; p = 0.030). S(max) was similar when EVE was applied to 8 mg intrathecal bupivacaine than without it (T(5.8) ± 1.8 vs. T(6.4) ± 2.2 respectively; p = 0.324). CONCLUSION: EVE should not be applied to 5 mg plain bupivacaine during a combined spinal epidural block in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery as it may result in a decrease in the maximum sensory level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9373371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93733712022-08-15 Clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial() Tyagi, Asha Ramanujam, Mukundan Sethi, Ashok Kumar Mohta, Medha Braz J Anesthesiol Clinical Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epidural Volume Extension (EVE) involves instillation of normal saline into the epidural space soon after an intrathecal injection, with the aim to augment the sensory block height. Its clinical relevance lies in the possibility of using reduced intrathecal dose and yet achieving the desired sensory block level. Intrathecal dose is a known determinant of the level of sensory block. Whether EVE is dependent on intrathecal dose is not known. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blind study to compare the maximum sensory level (S(max)) achieved with or without application of EVE to two different reduced intrathecal doses. Eighty four adult male patients of ASA status I or II with body weight between 50–70 kg and height in the range of 150–180 cm, scheduled for orthopedic lower limb surgery using combined spinal epidural anesthesia were randomized to receive, either intrathecal dose (5 or 8 mg) with or without EVE, in accordance to group allocation. RESULTS: S(max) was lowered by application of EVE to 5 mg intrathecal bupivacaine (T(8.9) ± 4.3 vs. T(6.4) ± 1.9 with and without EVE respectively; p = 0.030). S(max) was similar when EVE was applied to 8 mg intrathecal bupivacaine than without it (T(5.8) ± 1.8 vs. T(6.4) ± 2.2 respectively; p = 0.324). CONCLUSION: EVE should not be applied to 5 mg plain bupivacaine during a combined spinal epidural block in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery as it may result in a decrease in the maximum sensory level. Elsevier 2020-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9373371/ /pubmed/33712249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2020.12.005 Text en © 2020 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Tyagi, Asha Ramanujam, Mukundan Sethi, Ashok Kumar Mohta, Medha Clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial() |
title | Clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial() |
title_full | Clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial() |
title_fullStr | Clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial() |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial() |
title_short | Clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial() |
title_sort | clinical utility of epidural volume extension following reduced intrathecal doses: a randomized controlled trial() |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33712249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2020.12.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tyagiasha clinicalutilityofepiduralvolumeextensionfollowingreducedintrathecaldosesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ramanujammukundan clinicalutilityofepiduralvolumeextensionfollowingreducedintrathecaldosesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sethiashokkumar clinicalutilityofepiduralvolumeextensionfollowingreducedintrathecaldosesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mohtamedha clinicalutilityofepiduralvolumeextensionfollowingreducedintrathecaldosesarandomizedcontrolledtrial |