Cargando…

Evaluating surface coatings to reduce bone cement adhesion to point of care 3D printed molds in the intraoperative setting

BACKGROUND: Polymethyl methacrylate, or “bone cement,” can be used intraoperatively to replace damaged or diseased bone and to deliver local antibiotics. 3D printed molds allow surgeons to form personalized and custom shapes with bone cement. One factor hindering the clinical utility of anatomically...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beitler, Brian, Roytman, Gregory R., Parmer, Grace, Tommasini, Steven M., Wiznia, Daniel H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35960406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00156-6
_version_ 1784767602910822400
author Beitler, Brian
Roytman, Gregory R.
Parmer, Grace
Tommasini, Steven M.
Wiznia, Daniel H.
author_facet Beitler, Brian
Roytman, Gregory R.
Parmer, Grace
Tommasini, Steven M.
Wiznia, Daniel H.
author_sort Beitler, Brian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Polymethyl methacrylate, or “bone cement,” can be used intraoperatively to replace damaged or diseased bone and to deliver local antibiotics. 3D printed molds allow surgeons to form personalized and custom shapes with bone cement. One factor hindering the clinical utility of anatomically accurate 3D printed molds is that cured bone cement can be difficult to remove due to the strong adhesion between the mold and the bone cement. One way to reduce the adhesion between the 3D printed mold and the cured bone cement is with the use of a surface coating, such as a lubricant. This study sought to determine the optimal surface coating to prevent bone cement adhesion to 3D printed molds that could be utilized within a sterile operating room environment. METHODS: Hemispheric molds were 3D printed using a stereolithography printer. The molds were coated with four sterile surface coatings available in most operating theatres (light mineral oil, bacitracin ointment, lubricating jelly, and ultrasound transmission gel). Polymethyl methacrylate with tobramycin antibiotic was mixed and poured into the molds. The amount of force needed to “push out” the cured bone cement from the molds was measured to determine the efficacy of each surface coating. Tukey’s multiple comparison test was performed to compare the results of the pushout test. RESULTS: The average pushout force for the surface coatings, in increasing order, were as follows (mean ± standard deviation) --- bacitracin ointment: 9.10 ± 6.68 N, mineral oil: 104.93 ± 69.92 N, lubricating jelly: 147.76 ± 63.77 N, control group: 339.31 ± 305.20 N, ultrasound transmission gel 474.11 ± 94.77 N. Only the bacitracin ointment required significantly less pushout force than the control (p = 0.0123). CONCLUSIONS: The bacitracin ointment was the most effective surface coating, allowing the bone cement to be pushed out of the mold using the least amount of force. In addition, the low standard deviation speaks to the reliability of the bacitracin ointment to reduce mold adhesion compared to the other surface coatings. Given its efficacy as well as its ubiquitous presence in the hospital operating room setting, bacitracin ointment is an excellent choice to prevent adhesion between bone cement and 3D printed molds intraoperatively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9373469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93734692022-08-13 Evaluating surface coatings to reduce bone cement adhesion to point of care 3D printed molds in the intraoperative setting Beitler, Brian Roytman, Gregory R. Parmer, Grace Tommasini, Steven M. Wiznia, Daniel H. 3D Print Med Research BACKGROUND: Polymethyl methacrylate, or “bone cement,” can be used intraoperatively to replace damaged or diseased bone and to deliver local antibiotics. 3D printed molds allow surgeons to form personalized and custom shapes with bone cement. One factor hindering the clinical utility of anatomically accurate 3D printed molds is that cured bone cement can be difficult to remove due to the strong adhesion between the mold and the bone cement. One way to reduce the adhesion between the 3D printed mold and the cured bone cement is with the use of a surface coating, such as a lubricant. This study sought to determine the optimal surface coating to prevent bone cement adhesion to 3D printed molds that could be utilized within a sterile operating room environment. METHODS: Hemispheric molds were 3D printed using a stereolithography printer. The molds were coated with four sterile surface coatings available in most operating theatres (light mineral oil, bacitracin ointment, lubricating jelly, and ultrasound transmission gel). Polymethyl methacrylate with tobramycin antibiotic was mixed and poured into the molds. The amount of force needed to “push out” the cured bone cement from the molds was measured to determine the efficacy of each surface coating. Tukey’s multiple comparison test was performed to compare the results of the pushout test. RESULTS: The average pushout force for the surface coatings, in increasing order, were as follows (mean ± standard deviation) --- bacitracin ointment: 9.10 ± 6.68 N, mineral oil: 104.93 ± 69.92 N, lubricating jelly: 147.76 ± 63.77 N, control group: 339.31 ± 305.20 N, ultrasound transmission gel 474.11 ± 94.77 N. Only the bacitracin ointment required significantly less pushout force than the control (p = 0.0123). CONCLUSIONS: The bacitracin ointment was the most effective surface coating, allowing the bone cement to be pushed out of the mold using the least amount of force. In addition, the low standard deviation speaks to the reliability of the bacitracin ointment to reduce mold adhesion compared to the other surface coatings. Given its efficacy as well as its ubiquitous presence in the hospital operating room setting, bacitracin ointment is an excellent choice to prevent adhesion between bone cement and 3D printed molds intraoperatively. Springer International Publishing 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9373469/ /pubmed/35960406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00156-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Beitler, Brian
Roytman, Gregory R.
Parmer, Grace
Tommasini, Steven M.
Wiznia, Daniel H.
Evaluating surface coatings to reduce bone cement adhesion to point of care 3D printed molds in the intraoperative setting
title Evaluating surface coatings to reduce bone cement adhesion to point of care 3D printed molds in the intraoperative setting
title_full Evaluating surface coatings to reduce bone cement adhesion to point of care 3D printed molds in the intraoperative setting
title_fullStr Evaluating surface coatings to reduce bone cement adhesion to point of care 3D printed molds in the intraoperative setting
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating surface coatings to reduce bone cement adhesion to point of care 3D printed molds in the intraoperative setting
title_short Evaluating surface coatings to reduce bone cement adhesion to point of care 3D printed molds in the intraoperative setting
title_sort evaluating surface coatings to reduce bone cement adhesion to point of care 3d printed molds in the intraoperative setting
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35960406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41205-022-00156-6
work_keys_str_mv AT beitlerbrian evaluatingsurfacecoatingstoreducebonecementadhesiontopointofcare3dprintedmoldsintheintraoperativesetting
AT roytmangregoryr evaluatingsurfacecoatingstoreducebonecementadhesiontopointofcare3dprintedmoldsintheintraoperativesetting
AT parmergrace evaluatingsurfacecoatingstoreducebonecementadhesiontopointofcare3dprintedmoldsintheintraoperativesetting
AT tommasinistevenm evaluatingsurfacecoatingstoreducebonecementadhesiontopointofcare3dprintedmoldsintheintraoperativesetting
AT wizniadanielh evaluatingsurfacecoatingstoreducebonecementadhesiontopointofcare3dprintedmoldsintheintraoperativesetting