Cargando…
Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Retrolaminar Block (RLB) on intra- and postoperative analgesia in patients with Multiple Rib Fractures (MRFs). METHODS: A total of 80 MRFs patients were randomly divided into the ESPB (Group E) and RLB (Group R) groups. A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33895221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.004 |
_version_ | 1784767643219132416 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Yaoping Tao, Yan Zheng, Shaoqiang Cai, Nan Cheng, Long Xie, Hao Wang, Geng |
author_facet | Zhao, Yaoping Tao, Yan Zheng, Shaoqiang Cai, Nan Cheng, Long Xie, Hao Wang, Geng |
author_sort | Zhao, Yaoping |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Retrolaminar Block (RLB) on intra- and postoperative analgesia in patients with Multiple Rib Fractures (MRFs). METHODS: A total of 80 MRFs patients were randomly divided into the ESPB (Group E) and RLB (Group R) groups. After general anesthesia, ESPB and RLB were performed under ultrasound guidance, respectively, together with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine and Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA). RESULTS: Thirty-four cases in Group E and 33,cases in Group R showed unclear paravertebral spaces. The intraoperative dosage of remifentanil (mean ± SD) (392.8 ± 118.7 vs. 501.7 ± 190.0 μg) and postoperative morphine PCIA dosage, (7.35 ± 1.55 vs. 14.73 ± 2.18 mg) in Group R were significantly less than those in Group E; the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores in Group R at 2 (2.7 ± 1.2 vs. 3.4 ± 1.4), 4 (2.2 ± 1.1 vs. 2.8 ± 0.9), 12 (2.5 ± 0.9 vs. 3.0 ± 0.8), and 24 hours (2.6 ± 1.0 vs. 3.1 ± 0.9) after surgery were significantly lower than those in Group E. Finally, the normal respiratory diaphragm activity (2.17 ± 0.22 vs. 2.05 ± 0.19), pH (median [IQR] (7.38 [7.31–7.45] vs. 7.36 [7.30–7.42]), and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)) (44 [35–49] vs. 42.5 [30–46]) after the operation in Group R were significantly better than those in Group E (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RLB was a more effective analgesic method than ESPB in the treatment of MRF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9373659 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93736592022-08-15 Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial Zhao, Yaoping Tao, Yan Zheng, Shaoqiang Cai, Nan Cheng, Long Xie, Hao Wang, Geng Braz J Anesthesiol Original Investigation OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Retrolaminar Block (RLB) on intra- and postoperative analgesia in patients with Multiple Rib Fractures (MRFs). METHODS: A total of 80 MRFs patients were randomly divided into the ESPB (Group E) and RLB (Group R) groups. After general anesthesia, ESPB and RLB were performed under ultrasound guidance, respectively, together with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine and Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA). RESULTS: Thirty-four cases in Group E and 33,cases in Group R showed unclear paravertebral spaces. The intraoperative dosage of remifentanil (mean ± SD) (392.8 ± 118.7 vs. 501.7 ± 190.0 μg) and postoperative morphine PCIA dosage, (7.35 ± 1.55 vs. 14.73 ± 2.18 mg) in Group R were significantly less than those in Group E; the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores in Group R at 2 (2.7 ± 1.2 vs. 3.4 ± 1.4), 4 (2.2 ± 1.1 vs. 2.8 ± 0.9), 12 (2.5 ± 0.9 vs. 3.0 ± 0.8), and 24 hours (2.6 ± 1.0 vs. 3.1 ± 0.9) after surgery were significantly lower than those in Group E. Finally, the normal respiratory diaphragm activity (2.17 ± 0.22 vs. 2.05 ± 0.19), pH (median [IQR] (7.38 [7.31–7.45] vs. 7.36 [7.30–7.42]), and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)) (44 [35–49] vs. 42.5 [30–46]) after the operation in Group R were significantly better than those in Group E (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RLB was a more effective analgesic method than ESPB in the treatment of MRF. Elsevier 2021-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9373659/ /pubmed/33895221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.004 Text en © 2021 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Zhao, Yaoping Tao, Yan Zheng, Shaoqiang Cai, Nan Cheng, Long Xie, Hao Wang, Geng Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial |
title | Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial |
title_full | Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial |
title_short | Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial |
title_sort | effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33895221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaoyaoping effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial AT taoyan effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial AT zhengshaoqiang effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial AT cainan effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial AT chenglong effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial AT xiehao effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial AT wanggeng effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial |