Cargando…

Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Retrolaminar Block (RLB) on intra- and postoperative analgesia in patients with Multiple Rib Fractures (MRFs). METHODS: A total of 80 MRFs patients were randomly divided into the ESPB (Group E) and RLB (Group R) groups. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Yaoping, Tao, Yan, Zheng, Shaoqiang, Cai, Nan, Cheng, Long, Xie, Hao, Wang, Geng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33895221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.004
_version_ 1784767643219132416
author Zhao, Yaoping
Tao, Yan
Zheng, Shaoqiang
Cai, Nan
Cheng, Long
Xie, Hao
Wang, Geng
author_facet Zhao, Yaoping
Tao, Yan
Zheng, Shaoqiang
Cai, Nan
Cheng, Long
Xie, Hao
Wang, Geng
author_sort Zhao, Yaoping
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Retrolaminar Block (RLB) on intra- and postoperative analgesia in patients with Multiple Rib Fractures (MRFs). METHODS: A total of 80 MRFs patients were randomly divided into the ESPB (Group E) and RLB (Group R) groups. After general anesthesia, ESPB and RLB were performed under ultrasound guidance, respectively, together with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine and Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA). RESULTS: Thirty-four cases in Group E and 33,cases in Group R showed unclear paravertebral spaces. The intraoperative dosage of remifentanil (mean ± SD) (392.8 ± 118.7 vs. 501.7 ± 190.0 μg) and postoperative morphine PCIA dosage, (7.35 ± 1.55 vs. 14.73 ± 2.18 mg) in Group R were significantly less than those in Group E; the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores in Group R at 2 (2.7 ± 1.2 vs. 3.4 ± 1.4), 4 (2.2 ± 1.1 vs. 2.8 ± 0.9), 12 (2.5 ± 0.9 vs. 3.0 ± 0.8), and 24 hours (2.6 ± 1.0 vs. 3.1 ± 0.9) after surgery were significantly lower than those in Group E. Finally, the normal respiratory diaphragm activity (2.17 ± 0.22 vs. 2.05 ± 0.19), pH (median [IQR] (7.38 [7.31–7.45] vs. 7.36 [7.30–7.42]), and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)) (44 [35–49] vs. 42.5 [30–46]) after the operation in Group R were significantly better than those in Group E (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RLB was a more effective analgesic method than ESPB in the treatment of MRF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9373659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93736592022-08-15 Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial Zhao, Yaoping Tao, Yan Zheng, Shaoqiang Cai, Nan Cheng, Long Xie, Hao Wang, Geng Braz J Anesthesiol Original Investigation OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Retrolaminar Block (RLB) on intra- and postoperative analgesia in patients with Multiple Rib Fractures (MRFs). METHODS: A total of 80 MRFs patients were randomly divided into the ESPB (Group E) and RLB (Group R) groups. After general anesthesia, ESPB and RLB were performed under ultrasound guidance, respectively, together with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine and Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA). RESULTS: Thirty-four cases in Group E and 33,cases in Group R showed unclear paravertebral spaces. The intraoperative dosage of remifentanil (mean ± SD) (392.8 ± 118.7 vs. 501.7 ± 190.0 μg) and postoperative morphine PCIA dosage, (7.35 ± 1.55 vs. 14.73 ± 2.18 mg) in Group R were significantly less than those in Group E; the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores in Group R at 2 (2.7 ± 1.2 vs. 3.4 ± 1.4), 4 (2.2 ± 1.1 vs. 2.8 ± 0.9), 12 (2.5 ± 0.9 vs. 3.0 ± 0.8), and 24 hours (2.6 ± 1.0 vs. 3.1 ± 0.9) after surgery were significantly lower than those in Group E. Finally, the normal respiratory diaphragm activity (2.17 ± 0.22 vs. 2.05 ± 0.19), pH (median [IQR] (7.38 [7.31–7.45] vs. 7.36 [7.30–7.42]), and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)) (44 [35–49] vs. 42.5 [30–46]) after the operation in Group R were significantly better than those in Group E (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RLB was a more effective analgesic method than ESPB in the treatment of MRF. Elsevier 2021-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9373659/ /pubmed/33895221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.004 Text en © 2021 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Zhao, Yaoping
Tao, Yan
Zheng, Shaoqiang
Cai, Nan
Cheng, Long
Xie, Hao
Wang, Geng
Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial
title Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial
title_full Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial
title_fullStr Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial
title_short Effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial
title_sort effects of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block on analgesia for multiple rib fractures: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33895221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.004
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoyaoping effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT taoyan effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT zhengshaoqiang effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT cainan effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT chenglong effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT xiehao effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT wanggeng effectsoferectorspinaeplaneblockandretrolaminarblockonanalgesiaformultipleribfracturesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicaltrial