Cargando…
Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 for food and feed uses, under regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2018‐151)
Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 was developed by crossing to combine five single events: MON 89034, 1507, MIR162, NK603 and DAS‐40278‐9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the five single maize events and 16 of the subcombinations and did not identify safety...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35978615 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7451 |
_version_ | 1784767672511102976 |
---|---|
author | Mullins, Ewen Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Naegeli, Hanspeter Moreno, Francisco Javier Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Ardizzone, Michele De Sanctis, Giacomo Dumont, Antonio Fernandez Federici, Silvia Gennaro, Andrea Gomez Ruiz, Jose Angel Goumperis, Tilemachos Kagkli, Dafni Maria Lanzoni, Anna Lenzi, Paolo Lewandowska, Aleksandra Neri, Franco Maria Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos Raffaello, Tommaso Streissl, Franz |
author_facet | Mullins, Ewen Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Naegeli, Hanspeter Moreno, Francisco Javier Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Ardizzone, Michele De Sanctis, Giacomo Dumont, Antonio Fernandez Federici, Silvia Gennaro, Andrea Gomez Ruiz, Jose Angel Goumperis, Tilemachos Kagkli, Dafni Maria Lanzoni, Anna Lenzi, Paolo Lewandowska, Aleksandra Neri, Franco Maria Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos Raffaello, Tommaso Streissl, Franz |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 was developed by crossing to combine five single events: MON 89034, 1507, MIR162, NK603 and DAS‐40278‐9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the five single maize events and 16 of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the assessed subcombinations were identified that could lead to the modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the five‐event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that five‐event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as the non‐GM comparator and non‐GM maize varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable five‐event stack maize grains into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in nine of the maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the five‐event stack maize. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the five‐event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM maize varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9373840 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93738402022-08-16 Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 for food and feed uses, under regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2018‐151) Mullins, Ewen Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Naegeli, Hanspeter Moreno, Francisco Javier Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Ardizzone, Michele De Sanctis, Giacomo Dumont, Antonio Fernandez Federici, Silvia Gennaro, Andrea Gomez Ruiz, Jose Angel Goumperis, Tilemachos Kagkli, Dafni Maria Lanzoni, Anna Lenzi, Paolo Lewandowska, Aleksandra Neri, Franco Maria Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos Raffaello, Tommaso Streissl, Franz EFSA J Scientific Opinion Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 was developed by crossing to combine five single events: MON 89034, 1507, MIR162, NK603 and DAS‐40278‐9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the five single maize events and 16 of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the assessed subcombinations were identified that could lead to the modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the five‐event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that five‐event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as the non‐GM comparator and non‐GM maize varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable five‐event stack maize grains into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in nine of the maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the five‐event stack maize. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the five‐event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the tested non‐GM maize varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9373840/ /pubmed/35978615 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7451 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Mullins, Ewen Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Naegeli, Hanspeter Moreno, Francisco Javier Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Ardizzone, Michele De Sanctis, Giacomo Dumont, Antonio Fernandez Federici, Silvia Gennaro, Andrea Gomez Ruiz, Jose Angel Goumperis, Tilemachos Kagkli, Dafni Maria Lanzoni, Anna Lenzi, Paolo Lewandowska, Aleksandra Neri, Franco Maria Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos Raffaello, Tommaso Streissl, Franz Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 for food and feed uses, under regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2018‐151) |
title | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 for food and feed uses, under regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2018‐151) |
title_full | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 for food and feed uses, under regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2018‐151) |
title_fullStr | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 for food and feed uses, under regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2018‐151) |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 for food and feed uses, under regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2018‐151) |
title_short | Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS‐40278‐9 for food and feed uses, under regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2018‐151) |
title_sort | assessment of genetically modified maize mon 89034 × 1507 × mir162 × nk603 × das‐40278‐9 for food and feed uses, under regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 (application efsa‐gmo‐nl‐2018‐151) |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35978615 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7451 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT mullinsewen assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT bressonjeanlouis assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT dalmaytamas assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT dewhurstiancrawford assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT epsteinmichellem assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT firbanklesliegeorge assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT guerchephilippe assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT hejatkojan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT naegelihanspeter assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT morenofranciscojavier assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT noguefabien assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT rostoksnils assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT sanchezserranojosejuan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT savoinigiovanni assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT veromanneve assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT veronesifabio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT ardizzonemichele assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT desanctisgiacomo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT dumontantoniofernandez assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT federicisilvia assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT gennaroandrea assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT gomezruizjoseangel assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT goumperistilemachos assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT kagklidafnimaria assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT lanzonianna assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT lenzipaolo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT lewandowskaaleksandra assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT nerifrancomaria assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT paraskevopouloskonstantinos assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT raffaellotommaso assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 AT streisslfranz assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon890341507mir162nk603das402789forfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2018151 |