Cargando…

A Qualitative Force Field Analysis of Facilitators and Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice in Healthcare Using an Implementation Framework

Research has identified facilitators and barriers to implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Few studies have evaluated which factors persist among healthcare clinicians with extensive education and training on EBP implementation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine facili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McNett, Molly, Tucker, Sharon, Zadvinskis, Inga, Tolles, Diana, Thomas, Bindu, Gorsuch, Penelope, Gallagher-Ford, Lynn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35974880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00051-6
_version_ 1784767681693483008
author McNett, Molly
Tucker, Sharon
Zadvinskis, Inga
Tolles, Diana
Thomas, Bindu
Gorsuch, Penelope
Gallagher-Ford, Lynn
author_facet McNett, Molly
Tucker, Sharon
Zadvinskis, Inga
Tolles, Diana
Thomas, Bindu
Gorsuch, Penelope
Gallagher-Ford, Lynn
author_sort McNett, Molly
collection PubMed
description Research has identified facilitators and barriers to implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Few studies have evaluated which factors persist among healthcare clinicians with extensive education and training on EBP implementation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine facilitators and barriers to EBP implementation across a national sample of specialty-prepared EBP mentors in healthcare settings. Healthcare clinicians participating in an immersive 5-day EBP knowledge and skill building program were invited to complete a follow-up survey 12 months later to report on implementation experiences. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided content analysis of responses. A force field analysis using Lewin’s change theory was used to assign numerical ‘weights’ to factors. Eighty-four individuals reported facilitators and barriers to implementation. The majority occurred within the inner setting of the CFIR model. Facilitators were strong leadership engagement (n = 15), positive EBP culture (n = 9), and resources (n = 4). Barriers included lack of resources (n = 21), poor leadership engagement (n = 19), implementation climate (n = 17), lack of relative priority (n = 12), and organizational characteristics (n = 9). Respondents also identified simultaneous facilitators and barriers within the process domain of the CFIR model. The construct of stakeholder engagement was a barrier when absent from the implementation process (n = 23), yet was a strong facilitator when present (n = 23). Implementation in healthcare settings appears most effective when conducted by an interprofessional team with strong leadership, resources, stakeholder engagement, and positive EBP culture. When these same factors are absent, they remain persistent barriers to implementation, even among specialty-trained healthcare clinicians. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s43477-022-00051-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9373890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93738902022-08-12 A Qualitative Force Field Analysis of Facilitators and Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice in Healthcare Using an Implementation Framework McNett, Molly Tucker, Sharon Zadvinskis, Inga Tolles, Diana Thomas, Bindu Gorsuch, Penelope Gallagher-Ford, Lynn Glob Implement Res Appl Original Paper Research has identified facilitators and barriers to implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs). Few studies have evaluated which factors persist among healthcare clinicians with extensive education and training on EBP implementation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine facilitators and barriers to EBP implementation across a national sample of specialty-prepared EBP mentors in healthcare settings. Healthcare clinicians participating in an immersive 5-day EBP knowledge and skill building program were invited to complete a follow-up survey 12 months later to report on implementation experiences. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided content analysis of responses. A force field analysis using Lewin’s change theory was used to assign numerical ‘weights’ to factors. Eighty-four individuals reported facilitators and barriers to implementation. The majority occurred within the inner setting of the CFIR model. Facilitators were strong leadership engagement (n = 15), positive EBP culture (n = 9), and resources (n = 4). Barriers included lack of resources (n = 21), poor leadership engagement (n = 19), implementation climate (n = 17), lack of relative priority (n = 12), and organizational characteristics (n = 9). Respondents also identified simultaneous facilitators and barriers within the process domain of the CFIR model. The construct of stakeholder engagement was a barrier when absent from the implementation process (n = 23), yet was a strong facilitator when present (n = 23). Implementation in healthcare settings appears most effective when conducted by an interprofessional team with strong leadership, resources, stakeholder engagement, and positive EBP culture. When these same factors are absent, they remain persistent barriers to implementation, even among specialty-trained healthcare clinicians. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s43477-022-00051-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2022-08-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9373890/ /pubmed/35974880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00051-6 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
McNett, Molly
Tucker, Sharon
Zadvinskis, Inga
Tolles, Diana
Thomas, Bindu
Gorsuch, Penelope
Gallagher-Ford, Lynn
A Qualitative Force Field Analysis of Facilitators and Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice in Healthcare Using an Implementation Framework
title A Qualitative Force Field Analysis of Facilitators and Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice in Healthcare Using an Implementation Framework
title_full A Qualitative Force Field Analysis of Facilitators and Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice in Healthcare Using an Implementation Framework
title_fullStr A Qualitative Force Field Analysis of Facilitators and Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice in Healthcare Using an Implementation Framework
title_full_unstemmed A Qualitative Force Field Analysis of Facilitators and Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice in Healthcare Using an Implementation Framework
title_short A Qualitative Force Field Analysis of Facilitators and Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice in Healthcare Using an Implementation Framework
title_sort qualitative force field analysis of facilitators and barriers to evidence-based practice in healthcare using an implementation framework
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35974880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43477-022-00051-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mcnettmolly aqualitativeforcefieldanalysisoffacilitatorsandbarrierstoevidencebasedpracticeinhealthcareusinganimplementationframework
AT tuckersharon aqualitativeforcefieldanalysisoffacilitatorsandbarrierstoevidencebasedpracticeinhealthcareusinganimplementationframework
AT zadvinskisinga aqualitativeforcefieldanalysisoffacilitatorsandbarrierstoevidencebasedpracticeinhealthcareusinganimplementationframework
AT tollesdiana aqualitativeforcefieldanalysisoffacilitatorsandbarrierstoevidencebasedpracticeinhealthcareusinganimplementationframework
AT thomasbindu aqualitativeforcefieldanalysisoffacilitatorsandbarrierstoevidencebasedpracticeinhealthcareusinganimplementationframework
AT gorsuchpenelope aqualitativeforcefieldanalysisoffacilitatorsandbarrierstoevidencebasedpracticeinhealthcareusinganimplementationframework
AT gallagherfordlynn aqualitativeforcefieldanalysisoffacilitatorsandbarrierstoevidencebasedpracticeinhealthcareusinganimplementationframework
AT mcnettmolly qualitativeforcefieldanalysisoffacilitatorsandbarrierstoevidencebasedpracticeinhealthcareusinganimplementationframework
AT tuckersharon qualitativeforcefieldanalysisoffacilitatorsandbarrierstoevidencebasedpracticeinhealthcareusinganimplementationframework
AT zadvinskisinga qualitativeforcefieldanalysisoffacilitatorsandbarrierstoevidencebasedpracticeinhealthcareusinganimplementationframework
AT tollesdiana qualitativeforcefieldanalysisoffacilitatorsandbarrierstoevidencebasedpracticeinhealthcareusinganimplementationframework
AT thomasbindu qualitativeforcefieldanalysisoffacilitatorsandbarrierstoevidencebasedpracticeinhealthcareusinganimplementationframework
AT gorsuchpenelope qualitativeforcefieldanalysisoffacilitatorsandbarrierstoevidencebasedpracticeinhealthcareusinganimplementationframework
AT gallagherfordlynn qualitativeforcefieldanalysisoffacilitatorsandbarrierstoevidencebasedpracticeinhealthcareusinganimplementationframework