Cargando…

Long‐term clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative: A retrospective cohort study with a mean follow‐up of 10 years

BACKGROUND: Despite the large body of evidence on the efficacy of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects, few studies reported long‐term data (≥10‐year). METHODS: Periodontal patients treated with regenerative surgery with EMD between 1999 and 2012 were invi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Ry, Siro P., Roccuzzo, Andrea, Lang, Niklaus P., Sculean, Anton, Salvi, Giovanni E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34258767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JPER.21-0347
_version_ 1784767688815411200
author De Ry, Siro P.
Roccuzzo, Andrea
Lang, Niklaus P.
Sculean, Anton
Salvi, Giovanni E.
author_facet De Ry, Siro P.
Roccuzzo, Andrea
Lang, Niklaus P.
Sculean, Anton
Salvi, Giovanni E.
author_sort De Ry, Siro P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the large body of evidence on the efficacy of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects, few studies reported long‐term data (≥10‐year). METHODS: Periodontal patients treated with regenerative surgery with EMD between 1999 and 2012 were invited to participate in a clinical examination. The following clinical parameters were recorded and compared at baseline (T0), 6 months after surgery (T1) and after at least 8 years of follow‐up (T2): probing depth (PD), gingival recession (GR), clinical attachment level (CAL), plaque and bleeding scores. The primary outcome variable was CAL change. RESULTS: Forty‐one patients with 75 treated teeth were available for analysis. Out of these, 68 (tooth survival rate: 90.7%) reached the latest follow‐up with a mean observation period of 10.3 years (range: 8.0 to 21.3). The most frequent reason for tooth loss was recurrence of periodontal disease. Tooth survival curves showed a statistically significant difference between smokers and non‐smokers (P = 0.028). Mean CAL changed from 8.43 ± 1.86 (T0) to 6.47 ± 1.70 (T1) (P < 0.001) and to 5.91 ± 1.83 (T2) (P < 0.001). At T1, a CAL gain of ≥3 mm was measured in 35% of the defects whereas at T2 it was detected in 51% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Within their limitations, the present results have shown that in intrabony defects, the clinical improvements obtained following regenerative surgery with EMD can be maintained on a mean period of 10 years. Smoking status and maxillary molars were correlated with an increased risk for tooth and CAL loss, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9373923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93739232022-08-17 Long‐term clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative: A retrospective cohort study with a mean follow‐up of 10 years De Ry, Siro P. Roccuzzo, Andrea Lang, Niklaus P. Sculean, Anton Salvi, Giovanni E. J Periodontol Clinical Science BACKGROUND: Despite the large body of evidence on the efficacy of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects, few studies reported long‐term data (≥10‐year). METHODS: Periodontal patients treated with regenerative surgery with EMD between 1999 and 2012 were invited to participate in a clinical examination. The following clinical parameters were recorded and compared at baseline (T0), 6 months after surgery (T1) and after at least 8 years of follow‐up (T2): probing depth (PD), gingival recession (GR), clinical attachment level (CAL), plaque and bleeding scores. The primary outcome variable was CAL change. RESULTS: Forty‐one patients with 75 treated teeth were available for analysis. Out of these, 68 (tooth survival rate: 90.7%) reached the latest follow‐up with a mean observation period of 10.3 years (range: 8.0 to 21.3). The most frequent reason for tooth loss was recurrence of periodontal disease. Tooth survival curves showed a statistically significant difference between smokers and non‐smokers (P = 0.028). Mean CAL changed from 8.43 ± 1.86 (T0) to 6.47 ± 1.70 (T1) (P < 0.001) and to 5.91 ± 1.83 (T2) (P < 0.001). At T1, a CAL gain of ≥3 mm was measured in 35% of the defects whereas at T2 it was detected in 51% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Within their limitations, the present results have shown that in intrabony defects, the clinical improvements obtained following regenerative surgery with EMD can be maintained on a mean period of 10 years. Smoking status and maxillary molars were correlated with an increased risk for tooth and CAL loss, respectively. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-08 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9373923/ /pubmed/34258767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JPER.21-0347 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Periodontology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Periodontology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Science
De Ry, Siro P.
Roccuzzo, Andrea
Lang, Niklaus P.
Sculean, Anton
Salvi, Giovanni E.
Long‐term clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative: A retrospective cohort study with a mean follow‐up of 10 years
title Long‐term clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative: A retrospective cohort study with a mean follow‐up of 10 years
title_full Long‐term clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative: A retrospective cohort study with a mean follow‐up of 10 years
title_fullStr Long‐term clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative: A retrospective cohort study with a mean follow‐up of 10 years
title_full_unstemmed Long‐term clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative: A retrospective cohort study with a mean follow‐up of 10 years
title_short Long‐term clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative: A retrospective cohort study with a mean follow‐up of 10 years
title_sort long‐term clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative: a retrospective cohort study with a mean follow‐up of 10 years
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34258767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JPER.21-0347
work_keys_str_mv AT derysirop longtermclinicaloutcomesofperiodontalregenerationwithenamelmatrixderivativearetrospectivecohortstudywithameanfollowupof10years
AT roccuzzoandrea longtermclinicaloutcomesofperiodontalregenerationwithenamelmatrixderivativearetrospectivecohortstudywithameanfollowupof10years
AT langniklausp longtermclinicaloutcomesofperiodontalregenerationwithenamelmatrixderivativearetrospectivecohortstudywithameanfollowupof10years
AT sculeananton longtermclinicaloutcomesofperiodontalregenerationwithenamelmatrixderivativearetrospectivecohortstudywithameanfollowupof10years
AT salvigiovannie longtermclinicaloutcomesofperiodontalregenerationwithenamelmatrixderivativearetrospectivecohortstudywithameanfollowupof10years