Cargando…

Effect of Propofol or Etomidate as General Anaesthesia Induction on Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study with 10 Years’ Follow-Up

OBJECTIVE: The aim is to study the effect of intraoperative application of propofol and etomidate on the long-term prognosis of patients with gastric cancer at the same tumor stage. METHODS: A total of 1018 patients who underwent radical gastric cancer surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Xianfu, Yu, Yue, Wang, Yan, Lyu, Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35967754
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S361052
_version_ 1784767701978185728
author Lu, Xianfu
Yu, Yue
Wang, Yan
Lyu, Yi
author_facet Lu, Xianfu
Yu, Yue
Wang, Yan
Lyu, Yi
author_sort Lu, Xianfu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim is to study the effect of intraoperative application of propofol and etomidate on the long-term prognosis of patients with gastric cancer at the same tumor stage. METHODS: A total of 1018 patients who underwent radical gastric cancer surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2010 to December 2010 were selected and divided into the propofol and etomidate groups according to the different anesthetic induction drugs. RESULTS: Among 244 patients in TNM stage IIIA, survival times were 36.10 and 41.79 for etomidate and propofol, respectively, which were statistically different (p < 0.05). Among the 82 patients in TNM stage IIIC, survival times were 26.57 and 35.20 for etomidate and propofol, respectively, which were statistically different (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing radical gastric cancer surgery, the application of propofol during induction of anaesthesia is more beneficial in improving the postoperative survival time compared to the application of etomidate at a specific TNM stage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9373996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93739962022-08-13 Effect of Propofol or Etomidate as General Anaesthesia Induction on Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study with 10 Years’ Follow-Up Lu, Xianfu Yu, Yue Wang, Yan Lyu, Yi Cancer Manag Res Original Research OBJECTIVE: The aim is to study the effect of intraoperative application of propofol and etomidate on the long-term prognosis of patients with gastric cancer at the same tumor stage. METHODS: A total of 1018 patients who underwent radical gastric cancer surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2010 to December 2010 were selected and divided into the propofol and etomidate groups according to the different anesthetic induction drugs. RESULTS: Among 244 patients in TNM stage IIIA, survival times were 36.10 and 41.79 for etomidate and propofol, respectively, which were statistically different (p < 0.05). Among the 82 patients in TNM stage IIIC, survival times were 26.57 and 35.20 for etomidate and propofol, respectively, which were statistically different (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing radical gastric cancer surgery, the application of propofol during induction of anaesthesia is more beneficial in improving the postoperative survival time compared to the application of etomidate at a specific TNM stage. Dove 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9373996/ /pubmed/35967754 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S361052 Text en © 2022 Lu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Lu, Xianfu
Yu, Yue
Wang, Yan
Lyu, Yi
Effect of Propofol or Etomidate as General Anaesthesia Induction on Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study with 10 Years’ Follow-Up
title Effect of Propofol or Etomidate as General Anaesthesia Induction on Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study with 10 Years’ Follow-Up
title_full Effect of Propofol or Etomidate as General Anaesthesia Induction on Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study with 10 Years’ Follow-Up
title_fullStr Effect of Propofol or Etomidate as General Anaesthesia Induction on Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study with 10 Years’ Follow-Up
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Propofol or Etomidate as General Anaesthesia Induction on Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study with 10 Years’ Follow-Up
title_short Effect of Propofol or Etomidate as General Anaesthesia Induction on Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study with 10 Years’ Follow-Up
title_sort effect of propofol or etomidate as general anaesthesia induction on gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study with 10 years’ follow-up
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9373996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35967754
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S361052
work_keys_str_mv AT luxianfu effectofpropofoloretomidateasgeneralanaesthesiainductionongastriccanceraretrospectivecohortstudywith10yearsfollowup
AT yuyue effectofpropofoloretomidateasgeneralanaesthesiainductionongastriccanceraretrospectivecohortstudywith10yearsfollowup
AT wangyan effectofpropofoloretomidateasgeneralanaesthesiainductionongastriccanceraretrospectivecohortstudywith10yearsfollowup
AT lyuyi effectofpropofoloretomidateasgeneralanaesthesiainductionongastriccanceraretrospectivecohortstudywith10yearsfollowup