Cargando…

Pregnancy Intention Screening in Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Pilot Testing a Standardized Assessment Tool

OBJECTIVE: Systemic rheumatic conditions affect reproductive‐aged patients and often require potentially teratogenic medications. We assessed the feasibility and impact of a standardized pregnancy intention screening question (One Key Question [OKQ]) in a large academic rheumatology practice. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pryor, Katherine P., Albert, Bill, Desai, Sonali, Ritter, Susan Y., Tarter, Laura, Coblyn, Jonathan, Bermas, Bonnie L., Santacroce, Leah M., Dutton, Caryn, Braaten, Kari P., Pace, Lydia E., Rexrode, Kathryn, Janiak, Elizabeth, Feldman, Candace H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9374050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35639495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11449
_version_ 1784767711914491904
author Pryor, Katherine P.
Albert, Bill
Desai, Sonali
Ritter, Susan Y.
Tarter, Laura
Coblyn, Jonathan
Bermas, Bonnie L.
Santacroce, Leah M.
Dutton, Caryn
Braaten, Kari P.
Pace, Lydia E.
Rexrode, Kathryn
Janiak, Elizabeth
Feldman, Candace H.
author_facet Pryor, Katherine P.
Albert, Bill
Desai, Sonali
Ritter, Susan Y.
Tarter, Laura
Coblyn, Jonathan
Bermas, Bonnie L.
Santacroce, Leah M.
Dutton, Caryn
Braaten, Kari P.
Pace, Lydia E.
Rexrode, Kathryn
Janiak, Elizabeth
Feldman, Candace H.
author_sort Pryor, Katherine P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Systemic rheumatic conditions affect reproductive‐aged patients and often require potentially teratogenic medications. We assessed the feasibility and impact of a standardized pregnancy intention screening question (One Key Question [OKQ]) in a large academic rheumatology practice. METHODS: This 6‐month pilot quality improvement initiative prompted rheumatologists to ask female patients aged 18 to 49 years about their pregnancy intentions using OKQ. We administered surveys to assess rheumatologists’ barriers to and comfort with reproductive health issues. We performed chart reviews to assess uptake and impact on documentation, comparing charts with OKQ documented with 100 randomly selected charts eligible for pregnancy intention screening but without OKQ documented. RESULTS: When we compared 32 of 43 preimplementation responses with 29 of 41 postimplementation responses, the proportion of rheumatologists who reported they were very comfortable with assessing their patients’ reproductive goals increased (31%‐38%) and the proportion reporting obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) referral challenges as barriers to discussing reproductive goals decreased (41%‐21%). During the implementation period, 83 of 957 (9%) eligible patients had OKQ documented in their chart. Female providers were more likely to screen than male providers (odds ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.21‐4.85). Screened patients were more likely to have their contraceptive method documented (P < 0.001) and more likely to have been referred to OB/GYN for follow‐up (P = 0.003) compared with patients who were not screened with OKQ. CONCLUSION: Although uptake was low, this tool improved provider comfort with assessing reproductive goals, the quality of documentation, and the likelihood of OB/GYN referral. Future studies should examine whether automated medical record alerts to prompt screening increase uptake.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9374050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93740502022-08-16 Pregnancy Intention Screening in Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Pilot Testing a Standardized Assessment Tool Pryor, Katherine P. Albert, Bill Desai, Sonali Ritter, Susan Y. Tarter, Laura Coblyn, Jonathan Bermas, Bonnie L. Santacroce, Leah M. Dutton, Caryn Braaten, Kari P. Pace, Lydia E. Rexrode, Kathryn Janiak, Elizabeth Feldman, Candace H. ACR Open Rheumatol Brief Report OBJECTIVE: Systemic rheumatic conditions affect reproductive‐aged patients and often require potentially teratogenic medications. We assessed the feasibility and impact of a standardized pregnancy intention screening question (One Key Question [OKQ]) in a large academic rheumatology practice. METHODS: This 6‐month pilot quality improvement initiative prompted rheumatologists to ask female patients aged 18 to 49 years about their pregnancy intentions using OKQ. We administered surveys to assess rheumatologists’ barriers to and comfort with reproductive health issues. We performed chart reviews to assess uptake and impact on documentation, comparing charts with OKQ documented with 100 randomly selected charts eligible for pregnancy intention screening but without OKQ documented. RESULTS: When we compared 32 of 43 preimplementation responses with 29 of 41 postimplementation responses, the proportion of rheumatologists who reported they were very comfortable with assessing their patients’ reproductive goals increased (31%‐38%) and the proportion reporting obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) referral challenges as barriers to discussing reproductive goals decreased (41%‐21%). During the implementation period, 83 of 957 (9%) eligible patients had OKQ documented in their chart. Female providers were more likely to screen than male providers (odds ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.21‐4.85). Screened patients were more likely to have their contraceptive method documented (P < 0.001) and more likely to have been referred to OB/GYN for follow‐up (P = 0.003) compared with patients who were not screened with OKQ. CONCLUSION: Although uptake was low, this tool improved provider comfort with assessing reproductive goals, the quality of documentation, and the likelihood of OB/GYN referral. Future studies should examine whether automated medical record alerts to prompt screening increase uptake. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9374050/ /pubmed/35639495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11449 Text en © 2022 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Pryor, Katherine P.
Albert, Bill
Desai, Sonali
Ritter, Susan Y.
Tarter, Laura
Coblyn, Jonathan
Bermas, Bonnie L.
Santacroce, Leah M.
Dutton, Caryn
Braaten, Kari P.
Pace, Lydia E.
Rexrode, Kathryn
Janiak, Elizabeth
Feldman, Candace H.
Pregnancy Intention Screening in Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Pilot Testing a Standardized Assessment Tool
title Pregnancy Intention Screening in Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Pilot Testing a Standardized Assessment Tool
title_full Pregnancy Intention Screening in Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Pilot Testing a Standardized Assessment Tool
title_fullStr Pregnancy Intention Screening in Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Pilot Testing a Standardized Assessment Tool
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy Intention Screening in Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Pilot Testing a Standardized Assessment Tool
title_short Pregnancy Intention Screening in Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Pilot Testing a Standardized Assessment Tool
title_sort pregnancy intention screening in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases: pilot testing a standardized assessment tool
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9374050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35639495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11449
work_keys_str_mv AT pryorkatherinep pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool
AT albertbill pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool
AT desaisonali pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool
AT rittersusany pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool
AT tarterlaura pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool
AT coblynjonathan pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool
AT bermasbonniel pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool
AT santacroceleahm pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool
AT duttoncaryn pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool
AT braatenkarip pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool
AT pacelydiae pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool
AT rexrodekathryn pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool
AT janiakelizabeth pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool
AT feldmancandaceh pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool