Cargando…
Pregnancy Intention Screening in Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Pilot Testing a Standardized Assessment Tool
OBJECTIVE: Systemic rheumatic conditions affect reproductive‐aged patients and often require potentially teratogenic medications. We assessed the feasibility and impact of a standardized pregnancy intention screening question (One Key Question [OKQ]) in a large academic rheumatology practice. METHOD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9374050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35639495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11449 |
_version_ | 1784767711914491904 |
---|---|
author | Pryor, Katherine P. Albert, Bill Desai, Sonali Ritter, Susan Y. Tarter, Laura Coblyn, Jonathan Bermas, Bonnie L. Santacroce, Leah M. Dutton, Caryn Braaten, Kari P. Pace, Lydia E. Rexrode, Kathryn Janiak, Elizabeth Feldman, Candace H. |
author_facet | Pryor, Katherine P. Albert, Bill Desai, Sonali Ritter, Susan Y. Tarter, Laura Coblyn, Jonathan Bermas, Bonnie L. Santacroce, Leah M. Dutton, Caryn Braaten, Kari P. Pace, Lydia E. Rexrode, Kathryn Janiak, Elizabeth Feldman, Candace H. |
author_sort | Pryor, Katherine P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Systemic rheumatic conditions affect reproductive‐aged patients and often require potentially teratogenic medications. We assessed the feasibility and impact of a standardized pregnancy intention screening question (One Key Question [OKQ]) in a large academic rheumatology practice. METHODS: This 6‐month pilot quality improvement initiative prompted rheumatologists to ask female patients aged 18 to 49 years about their pregnancy intentions using OKQ. We administered surveys to assess rheumatologists’ barriers to and comfort with reproductive health issues. We performed chart reviews to assess uptake and impact on documentation, comparing charts with OKQ documented with 100 randomly selected charts eligible for pregnancy intention screening but without OKQ documented. RESULTS: When we compared 32 of 43 preimplementation responses with 29 of 41 postimplementation responses, the proportion of rheumatologists who reported they were very comfortable with assessing their patients’ reproductive goals increased (31%‐38%) and the proportion reporting obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) referral challenges as barriers to discussing reproductive goals decreased (41%‐21%). During the implementation period, 83 of 957 (9%) eligible patients had OKQ documented in their chart. Female providers were more likely to screen than male providers (odds ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.21‐4.85). Screened patients were more likely to have their contraceptive method documented (P < 0.001) and more likely to have been referred to OB/GYN for follow‐up (P = 0.003) compared with patients who were not screened with OKQ. CONCLUSION: Although uptake was low, this tool improved provider comfort with assessing reproductive goals, the quality of documentation, and the likelihood of OB/GYN referral. Future studies should examine whether automated medical record alerts to prompt screening increase uptake. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9374050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93740502022-08-16 Pregnancy Intention Screening in Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Pilot Testing a Standardized Assessment Tool Pryor, Katherine P. Albert, Bill Desai, Sonali Ritter, Susan Y. Tarter, Laura Coblyn, Jonathan Bermas, Bonnie L. Santacroce, Leah M. Dutton, Caryn Braaten, Kari P. Pace, Lydia E. Rexrode, Kathryn Janiak, Elizabeth Feldman, Candace H. ACR Open Rheumatol Brief Report OBJECTIVE: Systemic rheumatic conditions affect reproductive‐aged patients and often require potentially teratogenic medications. We assessed the feasibility and impact of a standardized pregnancy intention screening question (One Key Question [OKQ]) in a large academic rheumatology practice. METHODS: This 6‐month pilot quality improvement initiative prompted rheumatologists to ask female patients aged 18 to 49 years about their pregnancy intentions using OKQ. We administered surveys to assess rheumatologists’ barriers to and comfort with reproductive health issues. We performed chart reviews to assess uptake and impact on documentation, comparing charts with OKQ documented with 100 randomly selected charts eligible for pregnancy intention screening but without OKQ documented. RESULTS: When we compared 32 of 43 preimplementation responses with 29 of 41 postimplementation responses, the proportion of rheumatologists who reported they were very comfortable with assessing their patients’ reproductive goals increased (31%‐38%) and the proportion reporting obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) referral challenges as barriers to discussing reproductive goals decreased (41%‐21%). During the implementation period, 83 of 957 (9%) eligible patients had OKQ documented in their chart. Female providers were more likely to screen than male providers (odds ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.21‐4.85). Screened patients were more likely to have their contraceptive method documented (P < 0.001) and more likely to have been referred to OB/GYN for follow‐up (P = 0.003) compared with patients who were not screened with OKQ. CONCLUSION: Although uptake was low, this tool improved provider comfort with assessing reproductive goals, the quality of documentation, and the likelihood of OB/GYN referral. Future studies should examine whether automated medical record alerts to prompt screening increase uptake. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9374050/ /pubmed/35639495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11449 Text en © 2022 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Pryor, Katherine P. Albert, Bill Desai, Sonali Ritter, Susan Y. Tarter, Laura Coblyn, Jonathan Bermas, Bonnie L. Santacroce, Leah M. Dutton, Caryn Braaten, Kari P. Pace, Lydia E. Rexrode, Kathryn Janiak, Elizabeth Feldman, Candace H. Pregnancy Intention Screening in Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Pilot Testing a Standardized Assessment Tool |
title | Pregnancy Intention Screening in Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Pilot Testing a Standardized Assessment Tool |
title_full | Pregnancy Intention Screening in Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Pilot Testing a Standardized Assessment Tool |
title_fullStr | Pregnancy Intention Screening in Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Pilot Testing a Standardized Assessment Tool |
title_full_unstemmed | Pregnancy Intention Screening in Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Pilot Testing a Standardized Assessment Tool |
title_short | Pregnancy Intention Screening in Patients With Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: Pilot Testing a Standardized Assessment Tool |
title_sort | pregnancy intention screening in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases: pilot testing a standardized assessment tool |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9374050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35639495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11449 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pryorkatherinep pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool AT albertbill pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool AT desaisonali pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool AT rittersusany pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool AT tarterlaura pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool AT coblynjonathan pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool AT bermasbonniel pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool AT santacroceleahm pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool AT duttoncaryn pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool AT braatenkarip pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool AT pacelydiae pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool AT rexrodekathryn pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool AT janiakelizabeth pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool AT feldmancandaceh pregnancyintentionscreeninginpatientswithsystemicrheumaticdiseasespilottestingastandardizedassessmenttool |