Cargando…
A state-of-the-science review and guide for measuring environmental exposure biomarkers in dried blood spots
BACKGROUND: Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling is a simple, cost-effective, and minimally invasive alternative to venipuncture for measuring exposure biomarkers in public health and epidemiological research. DBS sampling provides advantages in field-based studies conducted in low-resource settings and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35963945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41370-022-00460-7 |
_version_ | 1784767882266148864 |
---|---|
author | Jacobson, Tyler A. Kler, Jasdeep S. Bae, Yeunook Chen, Jiexi Ladror, Daniel T. Iyer, Ramsunder Nunes, Denise A. Montgomery, Nathan D. Pleil, Joachim D. Funk, William E. |
author_facet | Jacobson, Tyler A. Kler, Jasdeep S. Bae, Yeunook Chen, Jiexi Ladror, Daniel T. Iyer, Ramsunder Nunes, Denise A. Montgomery, Nathan D. Pleil, Joachim D. Funk, William E. |
author_sort | Jacobson, Tyler A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling is a simple, cost-effective, and minimally invasive alternative to venipuncture for measuring exposure biomarkers in public health and epidemiological research. DBS sampling provides advantages in field-based studies conducted in low-resource settings and in studies involving infants and children. In addition, DBS samples are routinely collected from newborns after birth (i.e., newborn dried blood spots, NDBS), with many states in the United States permitting access to archived NDBS samples for research purposes. OBJECTIVES: We review the state of the science for analyzing exposure biomarkers in DBS samples, both archived and newly collected, and provide guidance on sample collection, storage, and blood volume requirements associated with individual DBS assays. We discuss recent progress regarding analytical methods, analytical sensitivity, and specificity, sample volume requirements, contamination considerations, estimating extracted blood volumes, assessing stability and analyte recovery, and hematocrit effects. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL (EBSCO) was conducted in March 2022. DBS method development and application studies were divided into three main chemical classes: environmental tobacco smoke, trace elements (including lead, mercury, cadmium, and arsenic), and industrial chemicals (including endocrine-disrupting chemicals and persistent organic pollutants). DBS method development and validation studies were scored on key quality-control and performance parameters by two members of the review team. RESULTS: Our search identified 47 published reports related to measuring environmental exposure biomarkers in human DBS samples. A total of 28 reports (37 total studies) were on methods development and validation and 19 reports were primarily the application of previously developed DBS assays. High-performing DBS methods have been developed, validated, and applied for detecting environmental exposures to tobacco smoke, trace elements, and several important endocrine-disrupting chemicals and persistent organic pollutants. Additional work is needed for measuring cadmium, arsenic, inorganic mercury, and bisphenol A in DBS and NDBS samples. SIGNIFICANCE: We present an inventory and critical review of available assays for measuring environmental exposure biomarkers in DBS and NDBS samples to help facilitate this sampling medium as an emerging tool for public health (e.g., screening programs, temporal biomonitoring) and environmental epidemiology (e.g., field-based studies). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9375076 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93750762022-08-15 A state-of-the-science review and guide for measuring environmental exposure biomarkers in dried blood spots Jacobson, Tyler A. Kler, Jasdeep S. Bae, Yeunook Chen, Jiexi Ladror, Daniel T. Iyer, Ramsunder Nunes, Denise A. Montgomery, Nathan D. Pleil, Joachim D. Funk, William E. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Review Article BACKGROUND: Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling is a simple, cost-effective, and minimally invasive alternative to venipuncture for measuring exposure biomarkers in public health and epidemiological research. DBS sampling provides advantages in field-based studies conducted in low-resource settings and in studies involving infants and children. In addition, DBS samples are routinely collected from newborns after birth (i.e., newborn dried blood spots, NDBS), with many states in the United States permitting access to archived NDBS samples for research purposes. OBJECTIVES: We review the state of the science for analyzing exposure biomarkers in DBS samples, both archived and newly collected, and provide guidance on sample collection, storage, and blood volume requirements associated with individual DBS assays. We discuss recent progress regarding analytical methods, analytical sensitivity, and specificity, sample volume requirements, contamination considerations, estimating extracted blood volumes, assessing stability and analyte recovery, and hematocrit effects. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase (Elsevier), and CINAHL (EBSCO) was conducted in March 2022. DBS method development and application studies were divided into three main chemical classes: environmental tobacco smoke, trace elements (including lead, mercury, cadmium, and arsenic), and industrial chemicals (including endocrine-disrupting chemicals and persistent organic pollutants). DBS method development and validation studies were scored on key quality-control and performance parameters by two members of the review team. RESULTS: Our search identified 47 published reports related to measuring environmental exposure biomarkers in human DBS samples. A total of 28 reports (37 total studies) were on methods development and validation and 19 reports were primarily the application of previously developed DBS assays. High-performing DBS methods have been developed, validated, and applied for detecting environmental exposures to tobacco smoke, trace elements, and several important endocrine-disrupting chemicals and persistent organic pollutants. Additional work is needed for measuring cadmium, arsenic, inorganic mercury, and bisphenol A in DBS and NDBS samples. SIGNIFICANCE: We present an inventory and critical review of available assays for measuring environmental exposure biomarkers in DBS and NDBS samples to help facilitate this sampling medium as an emerging tool for public health (e.g., screening programs, temporal biomonitoring) and environmental epidemiology (e.g., field-based studies). Nature Publishing Group US 2022-08-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9375076/ /pubmed/35963945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41370-022-00460-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Jacobson, Tyler A. Kler, Jasdeep S. Bae, Yeunook Chen, Jiexi Ladror, Daniel T. Iyer, Ramsunder Nunes, Denise A. Montgomery, Nathan D. Pleil, Joachim D. Funk, William E. A state-of-the-science review and guide for measuring environmental exposure biomarkers in dried blood spots |
title | A state-of-the-science review and guide for measuring environmental exposure biomarkers in dried blood spots |
title_full | A state-of-the-science review and guide for measuring environmental exposure biomarkers in dried blood spots |
title_fullStr | A state-of-the-science review and guide for measuring environmental exposure biomarkers in dried blood spots |
title_full_unstemmed | A state-of-the-science review and guide for measuring environmental exposure biomarkers in dried blood spots |
title_short | A state-of-the-science review and guide for measuring environmental exposure biomarkers in dried blood spots |
title_sort | state-of-the-science review and guide for measuring environmental exposure biomarkers in dried blood spots |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35963945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41370-022-00460-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jacobsontylera astateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT klerjasdeeps astateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT baeyeunook astateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT chenjiexi astateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT ladrordanielt astateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT iyerramsunder astateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT nunesdenisea astateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT montgomerynathand astateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT pleiljoachimd astateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT funkwilliame astateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT jacobsontylera stateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT klerjasdeeps stateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT baeyeunook stateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT chenjiexi stateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT ladrordanielt stateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT iyerramsunder stateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT nunesdenisea stateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT montgomerynathand stateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT pleiljoachimd stateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots AT funkwilliame stateofthesciencereviewandguideformeasuringenvironmentalexposurebiomarkersindriedbloodspots |