Cargando…

Empirical evidence on the efficiency of backward contact tracing in COVID-19

Standard contact tracing practice for COVID-19 is to identify persons exposed to an infected person during the contagious period, assumed to start two days before symptom onset or diagnosis. In the first large cohort study on backward contact tracing for COVID-19, we extended the contact tracing win...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raymenants, Joren, Geenen, Caspar, Thibaut, Jonathan, Nelissen, Klaas, Gorissen, Sarah, Andre, Emmanuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35963872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32531-6
_version_ 1784767884960989184
author Raymenants, Joren
Geenen, Caspar
Thibaut, Jonathan
Nelissen, Klaas
Gorissen, Sarah
Andre, Emmanuel
author_facet Raymenants, Joren
Geenen, Caspar
Thibaut, Jonathan
Nelissen, Klaas
Gorissen, Sarah
Andre, Emmanuel
author_sort Raymenants, Joren
collection PubMed
description Standard contact tracing practice for COVID-19 is to identify persons exposed to an infected person during the contagious period, assumed to start two days before symptom onset or diagnosis. In the first large cohort study on backward contact tracing for COVID-19, we extended the contact tracing window by 5 days, aiming to identify the source of the infection and persons infected by the same source. The risk of infection amongst these additional contacts was similar to contacts exposed during the standard tracing window and significantly higher than symptomatic individuals in a control group, leading to 42% more cases identified as direct contacts of an index case. Compared to standard practice, backward traced contacts required fewer tests and shorter quarantine. However, they were identified later in their infectious cycle if infected. Our results support implementing backward contact tracing when rigorous suppression of viral transmission is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9375086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93750862022-08-15 Empirical evidence on the efficiency of backward contact tracing in COVID-19 Raymenants, Joren Geenen, Caspar Thibaut, Jonathan Nelissen, Klaas Gorissen, Sarah Andre, Emmanuel Nat Commun Article Standard contact tracing practice for COVID-19 is to identify persons exposed to an infected person during the contagious period, assumed to start two days before symptom onset or diagnosis. In the first large cohort study on backward contact tracing for COVID-19, we extended the contact tracing window by 5 days, aiming to identify the source of the infection and persons infected by the same source. The risk of infection amongst these additional contacts was similar to contacts exposed during the standard tracing window and significantly higher than symptomatic individuals in a control group, leading to 42% more cases identified as direct contacts of an index case. Compared to standard practice, backward traced contacts required fewer tests and shorter quarantine. However, they were identified later in their infectious cycle if infected. Our results support implementing backward contact tracing when rigorous suppression of viral transmission is warranted. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9375086/ /pubmed/35963872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32531-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Raymenants, Joren
Geenen, Caspar
Thibaut, Jonathan
Nelissen, Klaas
Gorissen, Sarah
Andre, Emmanuel
Empirical evidence on the efficiency of backward contact tracing in COVID-19
title Empirical evidence on the efficiency of backward contact tracing in COVID-19
title_full Empirical evidence on the efficiency of backward contact tracing in COVID-19
title_fullStr Empirical evidence on the efficiency of backward contact tracing in COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Empirical evidence on the efficiency of backward contact tracing in COVID-19
title_short Empirical evidence on the efficiency of backward contact tracing in COVID-19
title_sort empirical evidence on the efficiency of backward contact tracing in covid-19
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35963872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32531-6
work_keys_str_mv AT raymenantsjoren empiricalevidenceontheefficiencyofbackwardcontacttracingincovid19
AT geenencaspar empiricalevidenceontheefficiencyofbackwardcontacttracingincovid19
AT thibautjonathan empiricalevidenceontheefficiencyofbackwardcontacttracingincovid19
AT nelissenklaas empiricalevidenceontheefficiencyofbackwardcontacttracingincovid19
AT gorissensarah empiricalevidenceontheefficiencyofbackwardcontacttracingincovid19
AT andreemmanuel empiricalevidenceontheefficiencyofbackwardcontacttracingincovid19