Cargando…

Effects of farrowing induction using cloprostenol on sow farrowing characteristics

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Previous findings regarding the effects of farrowing induction on the farrowing characteristics of sows are controversial. This study aimed to investigate the effects of farrowing induction on the following characteristics: (1) Proportion of sows that farrowed during working hour...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nam, Nguyen Hoai, Dao, Bui Tran Anh, Sukon, Peerapol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Veterinary World 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35993062
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2022.1535-1540
_version_ 1784767915791220736
author Nam, Nguyen Hoai
Dao, Bui Tran Anh
Sukon, Peerapol
author_facet Nam, Nguyen Hoai
Dao, Bui Tran Anh
Sukon, Peerapol
author_sort Nam, Nguyen Hoai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Previous findings regarding the effects of farrowing induction on the farrowing characteristics of sows are controversial. This study aimed to investigate the effects of farrowing induction on the following characteristics: (1) Proportion of sows that farrowed during working hours, (2) stillbirth rate, (3) number of stillbirths per farrow, (4) dystocia rate per farrow, (5) dystocia rate (the proportion of farrowings that had at least one dystocia event), (6) number of dystocia events per farrow, (6) farrowing duration, (7) birth interval, and (8) birth weight. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight Landrace x Yorkshire sows were randomly allocated into two groups; the control group and the treatment group. In the control group (n = 18), sows farrowed spontaneously. In the treatment group (n = 20), farrowing was induced approximately 2 days earlier than the herd’s average length of gestation (7:00 am on day 114) by injecting cloprostenol into the perivulval region. All sows were supervised throughout their farrowing. We recorded the interval between induction and farrowing; total number of births; number of live, stillborn, and mummified piglet births; number of dystocia events; birth interval; farrowing duration; and birth weight. A generalized linear mixed model, a linear mixed-effects model, the Chi-squared test, and Student’s t-test were used to compare outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: Farrowing induction did not influence the percentage of sows that farrowed during working hours (7 am–5 pm), stillbirth rate, birth weight, and number of dystocia events per farrow. Farrowing induction led to an increase in birth interval, dystocia rate, dystocia per farrow (p < 0.05) and in addition to the percentage of sows that farrowed on the day following induction (60% vs. 27.8%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Farrowing induction using a single dose of cloprostenol 2 days before the expected farrowing date can be performed with care to concentrate farrowing into a short interval. This can enhance the optimization of cross-fostering and the practice of an all-in-all-out strategy in the swine breeding industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9375209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Veterinary World
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93752092022-08-19 Effects of farrowing induction using cloprostenol on sow farrowing characteristics Nam, Nguyen Hoai Dao, Bui Tran Anh Sukon, Peerapol Vet World Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIM: Previous findings regarding the effects of farrowing induction on the farrowing characteristics of sows are controversial. This study aimed to investigate the effects of farrowing induction on the following characteristics: (1) Proportion of sows that farrowed during working hours, (2) stillbirth rate, (3) number of stillbirths per farrow, (4) dystocia rate per farrow, (5) dystocia rate (the proportion of farrowings that had at least one dystocia event), (6) number of dystocia events per farrow, (6) farrowing duration, (7) birth interval, and (8) birth weight. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight Landrace x Yorkshire sows were randomly allocated into two groups; the control group and the treatment group. In the control group (n = 18), sows farrowed spontaneously. In the treatment group (n = 20), farrowing was induced approximately 2 days earlier than the herd’s average length of gestation (7:00 am on day 114) by injecting cloprostenol into the perivulval region. All sows were supervised throughout their farrowing. We recorded the interval between induction and farrowing; total number of births; number of live, stillborn, and mummified piglet births; number of dystocia events; birth interval; farrowing duration; and birth weight. A generalized linear mixed model, a linear mixed-effects model, the Chi-squared test, and Student’s t-test were used to compare outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: Farrowing induction did not influence the percentage of sows that farrowed during working hours (7 am–5 pm), stillbirth rate, birth weight, and number of dystocia events per farrow. Farrowing induction led to an increase in birth interval, dystocia rate, dystocia per farrow (p < 0.05) and in addition to the percentage of sows that farrowed on the day following induction (60% vs. 27.8%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Farrowing induction using a single dose of cloprostenol 2 days before the expected farrowing date can be performed with care to concentrate farrowing into a short interval. This can enhance the optimization of cross-fostering and the practice of an all-in-all-out strategy in the swine breeding industry. Veterinary World 2022-06 2022-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9375209/ /pubmed/35993062 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2022.1535-1540 Text en Copyright: © Nam, et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nam, Nguyen Hoai
Dao, Bui Tran Anh
Sukon, Peerapol
Effects of farrowing induction using cloprostenol on sow farrowing characteristics
title Effects of farrowing induction using cloprostenol on sow farrowing characteristics
title_full Effects of farrowing induction using cloprostenol on sow farrowing characteristics
title_fullStr Effects of farrowing induction using cloprostenol on sow farrowing characteristics
title_full_unstemmed Effects of farrowing induction using cloprostenol on sow farrowing characteristics
title_short Effects of farrowing induction using cloprostenol on sow farrowing characteristics
title_sort effects of farrowing induction using cloprostenol on sow farrowing characteristics
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35993062
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2022.1535-1540
work_keys_str_mv AT namnguyenhoai effectsoffarrowinginductionusingcloprostenolonsowfarrowingcharacteristics
AT daobuitrananh effectsoffarrowinginductionusingcloprostenolonsowfarrowingcharacteristics
AT sukonpeerapol effectsoffarrowinginductionusingcloprostenolonsowfarrowingcharacteristics