Cargando…
Effects of farrowing induction using cloprostenol on sow farrowing characteristics
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Previous findings regarding the effects of farrowing induction on the farrowing characteristics of sows are controversial. This study aimed to investigate the effects of farrowing induction on the following characteristics: (1) Proportion of sows that farrowed during working hour...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Veterinary World
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35993062 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2022.1535-1540 |
_version_ | 1784767915791220736 |
---|---|
author | Nam, Nguyen Hoai Dao, Bui Tran Anh Sukon, Peerapol |
author_facet | Nam, Nguyen Hoai Dao, Bui Tran Anh Sukon, Peerapol |
author_sort | Nam, Nguyen Hoai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: Previous findings regarding the effects of farrowing induction on the farrowing characteristics of sows are controversial. This study aimed to investigate the effects of farrowing induction on the following characteristics: (1) Proportion of sows that farrowed during working hours, (2) stillbirth rate, (3) number of stillbirths per farrow, (4) dystocia rate per farrow, (5) dystocia rate (the proportion of farrowings that had at least one dystocia event), (6) number of dystocia events per farrow, (6) farrowing duration, (7) birth interval, and (8) birth weight. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight Landrace x Yorkshire sows were randomly allocated into two groups; the control group and the treatment group. In the control group (n = 18), sows farrowed spontaneously. In the treatment group (n = 20), farrowing was induced approximately 2 days earlier than the herd’s average length of gestation (7:00 am on day 114) by injecting cloprostenol into the perivulval region. All sows were supervised throughout their farrowing. We recorded the interval between induction and farrowing; total number of births; number of live, stillborn, and mummified piglet births; number of dystocia events; birth interval; farrowing duration; and birth weight. A generalized linear mixed model, a linear mixed-effects model, the Chi-squared test, and Student’s t-test were used to compare outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: Farrowing induction did not influence the percentage of sows that farrowed during working hours (7 am–5 pm), stillbirth rate, birth weight, and number of dystocia events per farrow. Farrowing induction led to an increase in birth interval, dystocia rate, dystocia per farrow (p < 0.05) and in addition to the percentage of sows that farrowed on the day following induction (60% vs. 27.8%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Farrowing induction using a single dose of cloprostenol 2 days before the expected farrowing date can be performed with care to concentrate farrowing into a short interval. This can enhance the optimization of cross-fostering and the practice of an all-in-all-out strategy in the swine breeding industry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9375209 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Veterinary World |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93752092022-08-19 Effects of farrowing induction using cloprostenol on sow farrowing characteristics Nam, Nguyen Hoai Dao, Bui Tran Anh Sukon, Peerapol Vet World Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIM: Previous findings regarding the effects of farrowing induction on the farrowing characteristics of sows are controversial. This study aimed to investigate the effects of farrowing induction on the following characteristics: (1) Proportion of sows that farrowed during working hours, (2) stillbirth rate, (3) number of stillbirths per farrow, (4) dystocia rate per farrow, (5) dystocia rate (the proportion of farrowings that had at least one dystocia event), (6) number of dystocia events per farrow, (6) farrowing duration, (7) birth interval, and (8) birth weight. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight Landrace x Yorkshire sows were randomly allocated into two groups; the control group and the treatment group. In the control group (n = 18), sows farrowed spontaneously. In the treatment group (n = 20), farrowing was induced approximately 2 days earlier than the herd’s average length of gestation (7:00 am on day 114) by injecting cloprostenol into the perivulval region. All sows were supervised throughout their farrowing. We recorded the interval between induction and farrowing; total number of births; number of live, stillborn, and mummified piglet births; number of dystocia events; birth interval; farrowing duration; and birth weight. A generalized linear mixed model, a linear mixed-effects model, the Chi-squared test, and Student’s t-test were used to compare outcomes between the two groups. RESULTS: Farrowing induction did not influence the percentage of sows that farrowed during working hours (7 am–5 pm), stillbirth rate, birth weight, and number of dystocia events per farrow. Farrowing induction led to an increase in birth interval, dystocia rate, dystocia per farrow (p < 0.05) and in addition to the percentage of sows that farrowed on the day following induction (60% vs. 27.8%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Farrowing induction using a single dose of cloprostenol 2 days before the expected farrowing date can be performed with care to concentrate farrowing into a short interval. This can enhance the optimization of cross-fostering and the practice of an all-in-all-out strategy in the swine breeding industry. Veterinary World 2022-06 2022-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9375209/ /pubmed/35993062 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2022.1535-1540 Text en Copyright: © Nam, et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nam, Nguyen Hoai Dao, Bui Tran Anh Sukon, Peerapol Effects of farrowing induction using cloprostenol on sow farrowing characteristics |
title | Effects of farrowing induction using cloprostenol on sow farrowing characteristics |
title_full | Effects of farrowing induction using cloprostenol on sow farrowing characteristics |
title_fullStr | Effects of farrowing induction using cloprostenol on sow farrowing characteristics |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of farrowing induction using cloprostenol on sow farrowing characteristics |
title_short | Effects of farrowing induction using cloprostenol on sow farrowing characteristics |
title_sort | effects of farrowing induction using cloprostenol on sow farrowing characteristics |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375209/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35993062 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2022.1535-1540 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT namnguyenhoai effectsoffarrowinginductionusingcloprostenolonsowfarrowingcharacteristics AT daobuitrananh effectsoffarrowinginductionusingcloprostenolonsowfarrowingcharacteristics AT sukonpeerapol effectsoffarrowinginductionusingcloprostenolonsowfarrowingcharacteristics |