Cargando…

A novel GnRH antagonist protocol based on LH levels versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND: The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol is advantageous given that it can avoid severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), especially for patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Basic and clinical evidence has shown that a threshold of luteinizing horm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Shan, Lv, Ya-su, Han, Shuo, Liu, Minghui, Ma, Shuai, Ren, Haiying, Li, Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35964041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06586-1
_version_ 1784767928291295232
author Liu, Shan
Lv, Ya-su
Han, Shuo
Liu, Minghui
Ma, Shuai
Ren, Haiying
Li, Yuan
author_facet Liu, Shan
Lv, Ya-su
Han, Shuo
Liu, Minghui
Ma, Shuai
Ren, Haiying
Li, Yuan
author_sort Liu, Shan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol is advantageous given that it can avoid severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), especially for patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Basic and clinical evidence has shown that a threshold of luteinizing hormone (LH) stimulation is required for adequate follicular development and oocyte maturation. Ultra-low or high levels of LH are detrimental to pregnancy outcomes. We previously demonstrated that LH could be an indicator for the timing and dosage of antagonist administration in a retrospective study. METHODS/DESIGN: In this randomized, single-center, non-inferiority trial, we aim to test the hypothesis that there is no significant difference in cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates between PCOS patients stimulated with LH-based flexible protocol versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol. The primary efficacy endpoint will be the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle. The secondary outcomes will be clinical pregnancy rate, cancelation rate, serious OHSS rate, and cost-efficiency. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle in PCOS women was 80%. Considering that a non-inferiority threshold should retain 80% of the clinical effect of a control treatment, a minimal clinical difference of 16% (two-sided: α, 2.5%; β, 20%) and a total of 196 patients were needed. Anticipating a 10% dropout rate, the total number of patients required was 216. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of the LH-based flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS patients. Moreover, it evaluates the cost-efficiency of both protocols. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800018129. Date assigned: 31 August 2018. Protocol version: 1.0 (18 July 2017) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06586-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9375259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93752592022-08-14 A novel GnRH antagonist protocol based on LH levels versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial Liu, Shan Lv, Ya-su Han, Shuo Liu, Minghui Ma, Shuai Ren, Haiying Li, Yuan Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol is advantageous given that it can avoid severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), especially for patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Basic and clinical evidence has shown that a threshold of luteinizing hormone (LH) stimulation is required for adequate follicular development and oocyte maturation. Ultra-low or high levels of LH are detrimental to pregnancy outcomes. We previously demonstrated that LH could be an indicator for the timing and dosage of antagonist administration in a retrospective study. METHODS/DESIGN: In this randomized, single-center, non-inferiority trial, we aim to test the hypothesis that there is no significant difference in cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates between PCOS patients stimulated with LH-based flexible protocol versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol. The primary efficacy endpoint will be the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle. The secondary outcomes will be clinical pregnancy rate, cancelation rate, serious OHSS rate, and cost-efficiency. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle in PCOS women was 80%. Considering that a non-inferiority threshold should retain 80% of the clinical effect of a control treatment, a minimal clinical difference of 16% (two-sided: α, 2.5%; β, 20%) and a total of 196 patients were needed. Anticipating a 10% dropout rate, the total number of patients required was 216. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of the LH-based flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS patients. Moreover, it evaluates the cost-efficiency of both protocols. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800018129. Date assigned: 31 August 2018. Protocol version: 1.0 (18 July 2017) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06586-1. BioMed Central 2022-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9375259/ /pubmed/35964041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06586-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Liu, Shan
Lv, Ya-su
Han, Shuo
Liu, Minghui
Ma, Shuai
Ren, Haiying
Li, Yuan
A novel GnRH antagonist protocol based on LH levels versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial
title A novel GnRH antagonist protocol based on LH levels versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial
title_full A novel GnRH antagonist protocol based on LH levels versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial
title_fullStr A novel GnRH antagonist protocol based on LH levels versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial
title_full_unstemmed A novel GnRH antagonist protocol based on LH levels versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial
title_short A novel GnRH antagonist protocol based on LH levels versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial
title_sort novel gnrh antagonist protocol based on lh levels versus traditional flexible gnrh antagonist protocol in pcos patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35964041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06586-1
work_keys_str_mv AT liushan anovelgnrhantagonistprotocolbasedonlhlevelsversustraditionalflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcospatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT lvyasu anovelgnrhantagonistprotocolbasedonlhlevelsversustraditionalflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcospatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT hanshuo anovelgnrhantagonistprotocolbasedonlhlevelsversustraditionalflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcospatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT liuminghui anovelgnrhantagonistprotocolbasedonlhlevelsversustraditionalflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcospatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT mashuai anovelgnrhantagonistprotocolbasedonlhlevelsversustraditionalflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcospatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT renhaiying anovelgnrhantagonistprotocolbasedonlhlevelsversustraditionalflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcospatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT liyuan anovelgnrhantagonistprotocolbasedonlhlevelsversustraditionalflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcospatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT liushan novelgnrhantagonistprotocolbasedonlhlevelsversustraditionalflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcospatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT lvyasu novelgnrhantagonistprotocolbasedonlhlevelsversustraditionalflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcospatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT hanshuo novelgnrhantagonistprotocolbasedonlhlevelsversustraditionalflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcospatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT liuminghui novelgnrhantagonistprotocolbasedonlhlevelsversustraditionalflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcospatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT mashuai novelgnrhantagonistprotocolbasedonlhlevelsversustraditionalflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcospatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT renhaiying novelgnrhantagonistprotocolbasedonlhlevelsversustraditionalflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcospatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT liyuan novelgnrhantagonistprotocolbasedonlhlevelsversustraditionalflexiblegnrhantagonistprotocolinpcospatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial