Cargando…

A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States

INTRODUCTION: With increasing restrictions on abortion across the United States, we sought to understand whether people seeking abortion would consider ending their pregnancy on their own if unable to access a facility-based abortion. METHODS: From January to June 2019, we surveyed patients seeking...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ralph, Lauren, Ehrenreich, Katherine, Kaller, Shelly, Biggs, M. Antonia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35962384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01486-8
_version_ 1784767929032638464
author Ralph, Lauren
Ehrenreich, Katherine
Kaller, Shelly
Biggs, M. Antonia
author_facet Ralph, Lauren
Ehrenreich, Katherine
Kaller, Shelly
Biggs, M. Antonia
author_sort Ralph, Lauren
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: With increasing restrictions on abortion across the United States, we sought to understand whether people seeking abortion would consider ending their pregnancy on their own if unable to access a facility-based abortion. METHODS: From January to June 2019, we surveyed patients seeking abortion at 4 facilities in 3 US states. We explored consideration of self-managed abortion (SMA) using responses to the question: “Would you consider ending this pregnancy on your own if you are unable to obtain care at a health care facility?” We used multivariable Poisson regression to assess associations between individual sociodemographic, pregnancy and care-seeking characteristics and prevalence of considering SMA. In bivariate Poisson models, we also explored whether consideration of SMA differed by specific obstacles to abortion care. RESULTS: One-third (34%) of 741 participants indicated they would definitely or probably consider ending the pregnancy on their own if unable to obtain care at a facility. Consideration of SMA was higher among those who reported no health insurance (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.66; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.12–2.44), described the pregnancy as unintended (aPR = 1.53; 95% CI 1.08–2.16), were seeking abortion due to concerns about their own physical or mental health (aPR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.02, 2.20), or experienced obstacles that delayed their abortion care seeking (aPR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.49, 3.40). Compared to those who would not consider SMA, participants who would consider SMA expressed higher difficulty finding an abortion facility (35 vs. 27%, p = 0.019), figuring out how to get to the clinic (29 vs 21%, p = 0.021) and needing multiple clinic visits (23 vs 17%, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS. One in three people seeking facility-based abortion would consider SMA if unable to obtain abortion care at a facility. As abortion access becomes increasingly restricted in the US, SMA may become more common. Future research should continue to monitor people’s consideration and use of SMA and ensure that they have access to safe and effective methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9375262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93752622022-08-14 A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States Ralph, Lauren Ehrenreich, Katherine Kaller, Shelly Biggs, M. Antonia Reprod Health Research INTRODUCTION: With increasing restrictions on abortion across the United States, we sought to understand whether people seeking abortion would consider ending their pregnancy on their own if unable to access a facility-based abortion. METHODS: From January to June 2019, we surveyed patients seeking abortion at 4 facilities in 3 US states. We explored consideration of self-managed abortion (SMA) using responses to the question: “Would you consider ending this pregnancy on your own if you are unable to obtain care at a health care facility?” We used multivariable Poisson regression to assess associations between individual sociodemographic, pregnancy and care-seeking characteristics and prevalence of considering SMA. In bivariate Poisson models, we also explored whether consideration of SMA differed by specific obstacles to abortion care. RESULTS: One-third (34%) of 741 participants indicated they would definitely or probably consider ending the pregnancy on their own if unable to obtain care at a facility. Consideration of SMA was higher among those who reported no health insurance (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.66; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.12–2.44), described the pregnancy as unintended (aPR = 1.53; 95% CI 1.08–2.16), were seeking abortion due to concerns about their own physical or mental health (aPR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.02, 2.20), or experienced obstacles that delayed their abortion care seeking (aPR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.49, 3.40). Compared to those who would not consider SMA, participants who would consider SMA expressed higher difficulty finding an abortion facility (35 vs. 27%, p = 0.019), figuring out how to get to the clinic (29 vs 21%, p = 0.021) and needing multiple clinic visits (23 vs 17%, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS. One in three people seeking facility-based abortion would consider SMA if unable to obtain abortion care at a facility. As abortion access becomes increasingly restricted in the US, SMA may become more common. Future research should continue to monitor people’s consideration and use of SMA and ensure that they have access to safe and effective methods. BioMed Central 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9375262/ /pubmed/35962384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01486-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ralph, Lauren
Ehrenreich, Katherine
Kaller, Shelly
Biggs, M. Antonia
A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States
title A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States
title_full A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States
title_fullStr A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States
title_full_unstemmed A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States
title_short A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States
title_sort cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the united states
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35962384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01486-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ralphlauren acrosssectionalstudyexaminingconsiderationofselfmanagedabortionamongpeopleseekingfacilitybasedcareintheunitedstates
AT ehrenreichkatherine acrosssectionalstudyexaminingconsiderationofselfmanagedabortionamongpeopleseekingfacilitybasedcareintheunitedstates
AT kallershelly acrosssectionalstudyexaminingconsiderationofselfmanagedabortionamongpeopleseekingfacilitybasedcareintheunitedstates
AT biggsmantonia acrosssectionalstudyexaminingconsiderationofselfmanagedabortionamongpeopleseekingfacilitybasedcareintheunitedstates
AT ralphlauren crosssectionalstudyexaminingconsiderationofselfmanagedabortionamongpeopleseekingfacilitybasedcareintheunitedstates
AT ehrenreichkatherine crosssectionalstudyexaminingconsiderationofselfmanagedabortionamongpeopleseekingfacilitybasedcareintheunitedstates
AT kallershelly crosssectionalstudyexaminingconsiderationofselfmanagedabortionamongpeopleseekingfacilitybasedcareintheunitedstates
AT biggsmantonia crosssectionalstudyexaminingconsiderationofselfmanagedabortionamongpeopleseekingfacilitybasedcareintheunitedstates