Cargando…

Sonication versus the conventional method for evaluation of the dental microbiome: a prospective pilot study

OBJECTIVES: To investigate sonication as a new tool in microbiological probing of dental infections. METHODS: Comparison of a standard probing method: intraoperative swab, with sonication, and vortex of the removed tooth, was performed on 20 carious destructed teeth. Illumina high throughput sequenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagendorf, Oliver, Menzel, Peter, Schwarzer, Rolf, Neckel, Norbert, Preissner, Saskia, Heiland, Max, Nahles, Susanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35962429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02374-0
_version_ 1784767938702606336
author Wagendorf, Oliver
Menzel, Peter
Schwarzer, Rolf
Neckel, Norbert
Preissner, Saskia
Heiland, Max
Nahles, Susanne
author_facet Wagendorf, Oliver
Menzel, Peter
Schwarzer, Rolf
Neckel, Norbert
Preissner, Saskia
Heiland, Max
Nahles, Susanne
author_sort Wagendorf, Oliver
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate sonication as a new tool in microbiological probing of dental infections. METHODS: Comparison of a standard probing method: intraoperative swab, with sonication, and vortex of the removed tooth, was performed on 20 carious destructed teeth. Illumina high throughput sequencing of the 16S-rRNA-gene was used for assessing the microbial composition. Antibiotic susceptibility has been assigned based on known resistances of each detected species. Probing procedures were compared using Bland–Altmann-Test, and antibiotic susceptibility using the Friedmann-Test and alpha-adjusted post-hoc-analysis. RESULTS: In total, 60 samples were analysed: 20 intraoperative swabs, 20 vortex fluids, and 20 sonication fluids. Sonication fluid yielded the highest number of bacterial sequencing reads in all three procedures. Comparing the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of the identified bacteria, significantly more OTUs were found in sonication fluid samples. Phylum and order abundances varied between the three procedures. Significantly more Actinomycetales have been found in sonication fluid samples compared to swab samples. The assigned resistance rates for the identified bacteria (1.79–31.23%) showed no differences between the tested probing procedures. The lowest resistance rates were found for amoxicillin + clavulanate (3.95%) and levofloxacin (3.40%), with the highest in amoxicillin (30.21%) and clindamycin (21.88%). CONCLUSIONS: By using sonication on extracted teeth, it is possible to get a more comprehensive image of the residing microbial flora compared to the standard procedure. If sonication is not available, vortexing is a potential alternative. In immunocompromised patients, especially when actinomycosis is suspected, sonication should be considered for a more detailed microbiological evaluation of the potential disease-causing microbiome. Due to the high rates of antibiotic resistance, a more targeted antibiotic therapy is favourable. Levofloxacin should be considered as a first-line alternative to amoxicillin + clavulanate in patients with an allergy to penicillin. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02374-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9375313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93753132022-08-14 Sonication versus the conventional method for evaluation of the dental microbiome: a prospective pilot study Wagendorf, Oliver Menzel, Peter Schwarzer, Rolf Neckel, Norbert Preissner, Saskia Heiland, Max Nahles, Susanne BMC Oral Health Research OBJECTIVES: To investigate sonication as a new tool in microbiological probing of dental infections. METHODS: Comparison of a standard probing method: intraoperative swab, with sonication, and vortex of the removed tooth, was performed on 20 carious destructed teeth. Illumina high throughput sequencing of the 16S-rRNA-gene was used for assessing the microbial composition. Antibiotic susceptibility has been assigned based on known resistances of each detected species. Probing procedures were compared using Bland–Altmann-Test, and antibiotic susceptibility using the Friedmann-Test and alpha-adjusted post-hoc-analysis. RESULTS: In total, 60 samples were analysed: 20 intraoperative swabs, 20 vortex fluids, and 20 sonication fluids. Sonication fluid yielded the highest number of bacterial sequencing reads in all three procedures. Comparing the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of the identified bacteria, significantly more OTUs were found in sonication fluid samples. Phylum and order abundances varied between the three procedures. Significantly more Actinomycetales have been found in sonication fluid samples compared to swab samples. The assigned resistance rates for the identified bacteria (1.79–31.23%) showed no differences between the tested probing procedures. The lowest resistance rates were found for amoxicillin + clavulanate (3.95%) and levofloxacin (3.40%), with the highest in amoxicillin (30.21%) and clindamycin (21.88%). CONCLUSIONS: By using sonication on extracted teeth, it is possible to get a more comprehensive image of the residing microbial flora compared to the standard procedure. If sonication is not available, vortexing is a potential alternative. In immunocompromised patients, especially when actinomycosis is suspected, sonication should be considered for a more detailed microbiological evaluation of the potential disease-causing microbiome. Due to the high rates of antibiotic resistance, a more targeted antibiotic therapy is favourable. Levofloxacin should be considered as a first-line alternative to amoxicillin + clavulanate in patients with an allergy to penicillin. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02374-0. BioMed Central 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9375313/ /pubmed/35962429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02374-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wagendorf, Oliver
Menzel, Peter
Schwarzer, Rolf
Neckel, Norbert
Preissner, Saskia
Heiland, Max
Nahles, Susanne
Sonication versus the conventional method for evaluation of the dental microbiome: a prospective pilot study
title Sonication versus the conventional method for evaluation of the dental microbiome: a prospective pilot study
title_full Sonication versus the conventional method for evaluation of the dental microbiome: a prospective pilot study
title_fullStr Sonication versus the conventional method for evaluation of the dental microbiome: a prospective pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Sonication versus the conventional method for evaluation of the dental microbiome: a prospective pilot study
title_short Sonication versus the conventional method for evaluation of the dental microbiome: a prospective pilot study
title_sort sonication versus the conventional method for evaluation of the dental microbiome: a prospective pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35962429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02374-0
work_keys_str_mv AT wagendorfoliver sonicationversustheconventionalmethodforevaluationofthedentalmicrobiomeaprospectivepilotstudy
AT menzelpeter sonicationversustheconventionalmethodforevaluationofthedentalmicrobiomeaprospectivepilotstudy
AT schwarzerrolf sonicationversustheconventionalmethodforevaluationofthedentalmicrobiomeaprospectivepilotstudy
AT neckelnorbert sonicationversustheconventionalmethodforevaluationofthedentalmicrobiomeaprospectivepilotstudy
AT preissnersaskia sonicationversustheconventionalmethodforevaluationofthedentalmicrobiomeaprospectivepilotstudy
AT heilandmax sonicationversustheconventionalmethodforevaluationofthedentalmicrobiomeaprospectivepilotstudy
AT nahlessusanne sonicationversustheconventionalmethodforevaluationofthedentalmicrobiomeaprospectivepilotstudy