Cargando…

Effectiveness and implementation success of a co-produced physical activity referral scheme in Germany: study protocol of a pragmatic cluster randomised trial

BACKGROUND: While effective physical activity referral schemes (PARSs) and related structures for promoting physical activity (PA) already exist in several countries, in Germany, PARSs have not yet been implemented systematically and nationwide. Through a co-production approach with relevant actors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weissenfels, Anja, Klamroth, Sarah, Carl, Johannes, Naber, Inga, Mino, Eriselda, Geidl, Wolfgang, Gelius, Peter, Abu-Omar, Karim, Pfeifer, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35964042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13833-2
_version_ 1784767948723847168
author Weissenfels, Anja
Klamroth, Sarah
Carl, Johannes
Naber, Inga
Mino, Eriselda
Geidl, Wolfgang
Gelius, Peter
Abu-Omar, Karim
Pfeifer, Klaus
author_facet Weissenfels, Anja
Klamroth, Sarah
Carl, Johannes
Naber, Inga
Mino, Eriselda
Geidl, Wolfgang
Gelius, Peter
Abu-Omar, Karim
Pfeifer, Klaus
author_sort Weissenfels, Anja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While effective physical activity referral schemes (PARSs) and related structures for promoting physical activity (PA) already exist in several countries, in Germany, PARSs have not yet been implemented systematically and nationwide. Through a co-production approach with relevant actors in the German healthcare system, a PARS was developed, and an implementation plan was created (e.g. financing). This study protocol aims to evaluate the developed PARS for people with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Germany regarding its potential effectiveness and implementation success. METHODS: To evaluate the effectiveness and implementation success of the PARS, we will apply a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial (cRCT) in Hybrid II design by comparing two intervention groups (PARS vs PA advice [PAA]). The trial will take place in the Nürnberg metropolitan region, with 24 physician practices recruiting 567 people with NCDs. Both groups will receive brief PA advice from a physician to initially increase the participants’ motivation to change their activity level. Subsequently, the PARS group will be given individualised support from an exercise professional to increase their PA levels and be transferred to local exercise opportunities. In contrast, participants in the PAA group will receive only the brief PA advice as well as information and an overview of regional PA offerings to become more active at their own initiative. After 12 and 24 weeks, changes in moderate to vigorous PA and in physical activity-related health competence (movement competence, control competence, self-regulation competence) will be measured as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes will include changes in quality of life. To measure implementation success, we refer to the RE-AIM framework and draw on patient documentation, interviews, focus groups and surveys of the participating actors (physicians, exercise professionals). DISCUSSION: Through a between-group comparison, we will investigate whether additional individual support by an exercise professional compared to brief PA advice alone leads to higher PA levels in people with NCDs. The acceptance and feasibility of both interventions in routine care in the German healthcare system will also be evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04947787. Registered 01 June 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13833-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9375362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93753622022-08-14 Effectiveness and implementation success of a co-produced physical activity referral scheme in Germany: study protocol of a pragmatic cluster randomised trial Weissenfels, Anja Klamroth, Sarah Carl, Johannes Naber, Inga Mino, Eriselda Geidl, Wolfgang Gelius, Peter Abu-Omar, Karim Pfeifer, Klaus BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: While effective physical activity referral schemes (PARSs) and related structures for promoting physical activity (PA) already exist in several countries, in Germany, PARSs have not yet been implemented systematically and nationwide. Through a co-production approach with relevant actors in the German healthcare system, a PARS was developed, and an implementation plan was created (e.g. financing). This study protocol aims to evaluate the developed PARS for people with non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Germany regarding its potential effectiveness and implementation success. METHODS: To evaluate the effectiveness and implementation success of the PARS, we will apply a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial (cRCT) in Hybrid II design by comparing two intervention groups (PARS vs PA advice [PAA]). The trial will take place in the Nürnberg metropolitan region, with 24 physician practices recruiting 567 people with NCDs. Both groups will receive brief PA advice from a physician to initially increase the participants’ motivation to change their activity level. Subsequently, the PARS group will be given individualised support from an exercise professional to increase their PA levels and be transferred to local exercise opportunities. In contrast, participants in the PAA group will receive only the brief PA advice as well as information and an overview of regional PA offerings to become more active at their own initiative. After 12 and 24 weeks, changes in moderate to vigorous PA and in physical activity-related health competence (movement competence, control competence, self-regulation competence) will be measured as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes will include changes in quality of life. To measure implementation success, we refer to the RE-AIM framework and draw on patient documentation, interviews, focus groups and surveys of the participating actors (physicians, exercise professionals). DISCUSSION: Through a between-group comparison, we will investigate whether additional individual support by an exercise professional compared to brief PA advice alone leads to higher PA levels in people with NCDs. The acceptance and feasibility of both interventions in routine care in the German healthcare system will also be evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04947787. Registered 01 June 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13833-2. BioMed Central 2022-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9375362/ /pubmed/35964042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13833-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Weissenfels, Anja
Klamroth, Sarah
Carl, Johannes
Naber, Inga
Mino, Eriselda
Geidl, Wolfgang
Gelius, Peter
Abu-Omar, Karim
Pfeifer, Klaus
Effectiveness and implementation success of a co-produced physical activity referral scheme in Germany: study protocol of a pragmatic cluster randomised trial
title Effectiveness and implementation success of a co-produced physical activity referral scheme in Germany: study protocol of a pragmatic cluster randomised trial
title_full Effectiveness and implementation success of a co-produced physical activity referral scheme in Germany: study protocol of a pragmatic cluster randomised trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness and implementation success of a co-produced physical activity referral scheme in Germany: study protocol of a pragmatic cluster randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and implementation success of a co-produced physical activity referral scheme in Germany: study protocol of a pragmatic cluster randomised trial
title_short Effectiveness and implementation success of a co-produced physical activity referral scheme in Germany: study protocol of a pragmatic cluster randomised trial
title_sort effectiveness and implementation success of a co-produced physical activity referral scheme in germany: study protocol of a pragmatic cluster randomised trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35964042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13833-2
work_keys_str_mv AT weissenfelsanja effectivenessandimplementationsuccessofacoproducedphysicalactivityreferralschemeingermanystudyprotocolofapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial
AT klamrothsarah effectivenessandimplementationsuccessofacoproducedphysicalactivityreferralschemeingermanystudyprotocolofapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial
AT carljohannes effectivenessandimplementationsuccessofacoproducedphysicalactivityreferralschemeingermanystudyprotocolofapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial
AT naberinga effectivenessandimplementationsuccessofacoproducedphysicalactivityreferralschemeingermanystudyprotocolofapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial
AT minoeriselda effectivenessandimplementationsuccessofacoproducedphysicalactivityreferralschemeingermanystudyprotocolofapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial
AT geidlwolfgang effectivenessandimplementationsuccessofacoproducedphysicalactivityreferralschemeingermanystudyprotocolofapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial
AT geliuspeter effectivenessandimplementationsuccessofacoproducedphysicalactivityreferralschemeingermanystudyprotocolofapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial
AT abuomarkarim effectivenessandimplementationsuccessofacoproducedphysicalactivityreferralschemeingermanystudyprotocolofapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial
AT pfeiferklaus effectivenessandimplementationsuccessofacoproducedphysicalactivityreferralschemeingermanystudyprotocolofapragmaticclusterrandomisedtrial