Cargando…

Estimating causal effects in the presence of competing events using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv

BACKGROUND: When interested in a time-to-event outcome, competing events that prevent the occurrence of the event of interest may be present. In the presence of competing events, various estimands have been suggested for defining the causal effect of treatment on the event of interest. Depending on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Syriopoulou, Elisavet, Mozumder, Sarwar I., Rutherford, Mark J., Lambert, Paul C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35963987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01666-x
_version_ 1784767958427369472
author Syriopoulou, Elisavet
Mozumder, Sarwar I.
Rutherford, Mark J.
Lambert, Paul C.
author_facet Syriopoulou, Elisavet
Mozumder, Sarwar I.
Rutherford, Mark J.
Lambert, Paul C.
author_sort Syriopoulou, Elisavet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: When interested in a time-to-event outcome, competing events that prevent the occurrence of the event of interest may be present. In the presence of competing events, various estimands have been suggested for defining the causal effect of treatment on the event of interest. Depending on the estimand, the competing events are either accommodated or eliminated, resulting in causal effects with different interpretations. The former approach captures the total effect of treatment on the event of interest while the latter approach captures the direct effect of treatment on the event of interest that is not mediated by the competing event. Separable effects have also been defined for settings where the treatment can be partitioned into two components that affect the event of interest and the competing event through different causal pathways. METHODS: We outline various causal effects that may be of interest in the presence of competing events, including total, direct and separable effects, and describe how to obtain estimates using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv. Regression standardisation is applied by obtaining the average of individual estimates across all individuals in a study population after fitting a survival model. RESULTS: With standsurv several contrasts of interest can be calculated including differences, ratios and other user-defined functions. Confidence intervals can also be obtained using the delta method. Throughout we use an example analysing a publicly available dataset on prostate cancer to allow the reader to replicate the analysis and further explore the different effects of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Several causal effects can be defined in the presence of competing events and, under assumptions, estimates of those can be obtained using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv. The choice of which causal effect to define should be given careful consideration based on the research question and the audience to which the findings will be communicated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9375409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93754092022-08-14 Estimating causal effects in the presence of competing events using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv Syriopoulou, Elisavet Mozumder, Sarwar I. Rutherford, Mark J. Lambert, Paul C. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: When interested in a time-to-event outcome, competing events that prevent the occurrence of the event of interest may be present. In the presence of competing events, various estimands have been suggested for defining the causal effect of treatment on the event of interest. Depending on the estimand, the competing events are either accommodated or eliminated, resulting in causal effects with different interpretations. The former approach captures the total effect of treatment on the event of interest while the latter approach captures the direct effect of treatment on the event of interest that is not mediated by the competing event. Separable effects have also been defined for settings where the treatment can be partitioned into two components that affect the event of interest and the competing event through different causal pathways. METHODS: We outline various causal effects that may be of interest in the presence of competing events, including total, direct and separable effects, and describe how to obtain estimates using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv. Regression standardisation is applied by obtaining the average of individual estimates across all individuals in a study population after fitting a survival model. RESULTS: With standsurv several contrasts of interest can be calculated including differences, ratios and other user-defined functions. Confidence intervals can also be obtained using the delta method. Throughout we use an example analysing a publicly available dataset on prostate cancer to allow the reader to replicate the analysis and further explore the different effects of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Several causal effects can be defined in the presence of competing events and, under assumptions, estimates of those can be obtained using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv. The choice of which causal effect to define should be given careful consideration based on the research question and the audience to which the findings will be communicated. BioMed Central 2022-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9375409/ /pubmed/35963987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01666-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Syriopoulou, Elisavet
Mozumder, Sarwar I.
Rutherford, Mark J.
Lambert, Paul C.
Estimating causal effects in the presence of competing events using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv
title Estimating causal effects in the presence of competing events using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv
title_full Estimating causal effects in the presence of competing events using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv
title_fullStr Estimating causal effects in the presence of competing events using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv
title_full_unstemmed Estimating causal effects in the presence of competing events using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv
title_short Estimating causal effects in the presence of competing events using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv
title_sort estimating causal effects in the presence of competing events using regression standardisation with the stata command standsurv
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35963987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01666-x
work_keys_str_mv AT syriopoulouelisavet estimatingcausaleffectsinthepresenceofcompetingeventsusingregressionstandardisationwiththestatacommandstandsurv
AT mozumdersarwari estimatingcausaleffectsinthepresenceofcompetingeventsusingregressionstandardisationwiththestatacommandstandsurv
AT rutherfordmarkj estimatingcausaleffectsinthepresenceofcompetingeventsusingregressionstandardisationwiththestatacommandstandsurv
AT lambertpaulc estimatingcausaleffectsinthepresenceofcompetingeventsusingregressionstandardisationwiththestatacommandstandsurv