Cargando…
Estimating causal effects in the presence of competing events using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv
BACKGROUND: When interested in a time-to-event outcome, competing events that prevent the occurrence of the event of interest may be present. In the presence of competing events, various estimands have been suggested for defining the causal effect of treatment on the event of interest. Depending on...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35963987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01666-x |
_version_ | 1784767958427369472 |
---|---|
author | Syriopoulou, Elisavet Mozumder, Sarwar I. Rutherford, Mark J. Lambert, Paul C. |
author_facet | Syriopoulou, Elisavet Mozumder, Sarwar I. Rutherford, Mark J. Lambert, Paul C. |
author_sort | Syriopoulou, Elisavet |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: When interested in a time-to-event outcome, competing events that prevent the occurrence of the event of interest may be present. In the presence of competing events, various estimands have been suggested for defining the causal effect of treatment on the event of interest. Depending on the estimand, the competing events are either accommodated or eliminated, resulting in causal effects with different interpretations. The former approach captures the total effect of treatment on the event of interest while the latter approach captures the direct effect of treatment on the event of interest that is not mediated by the competing event. Separable effects have also been defined for settings where the treatment can be partitioned into two components that affect the event of interest and the competing event through different causal pathways. METHODS: We outline various causal effects that may be of interest in the presence of competing events, including total, direct and separable effects, and describe how to obtain estimates using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv. Regression standardisation is applied by obtaining the average of individual estimates across all individuals in a study population after fitting a survival model. RESULTS: With standsurv several contrasts of interest can be calculated including differences, ratios and other user-defined functions. Confidence intervals can also be obtained using the delta method. Throughout we use an example analysing a publicly available dataset on prostate cancer to allow the reader to replicate the analysis and further explore the different effects of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Several causal effects can be defined in the presence of competing events and, under assumptions, estimates of those can be obtained using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv. The choice of which causal effect to define should be given careful consideration based on the research question and the audience to which the findings will be communicated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9375409 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93754092022-08-14 Estimating causal effects in the presence of competing events using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv Syriopoulou, Elisavet Mozumder, Sarwar I. Rutherford, Mark J. Lambert, Paul C. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: When interested in a time-to-event outcome, competing events that prevent the occurrence of the event of interest may be present. In the presence of competing events, various estimands have been suggested for defining the causal effect of treatment on the event of interest. Depending on the estimand, the competing events are either accommodated or eliminated, resulting in causal effects with different interpretations. The former approach captures the total effect of treatment on the event of interest while the latter approach captures the direct effect of treatment on the event of interest that is not mediated by the competing event. Separable effects have also been defined for settings where the treatment can be partitioned into two components that affect the event of interest and the competing event through different causal pathways. METHODS: We outline various causal effects that may be of interest in the presence of competing events, including total, direct and separable effects, and describe how to obtain estimates using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv. Regression standardisation is applied by obtaining the average of individual estimates across all individuals in a study population after fitting a survival model. RESULTS: With standsurv several contrasts of interest can be calculated including differences, ratios and other user-defined functions. Confidence intervals can also be obtained using the delta method. Throughout we use an example analysing a publicly available dataset on prostate cancer to allow the reader to replicate the analysis and further explore the different effects of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Several causal effects can be defined in the presence of competing events and, under assumptions, estimates of those can be obtained using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv. The choice of which causal effect to define should be given careful consideration based on the research question and the audience to which the findings will be communicated. BioMed Central 2022-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9375409/ /pubmed/35963987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01666-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Syriopoulou, Elisavet Mozumder, Sarwar I. Rutherford, Mark J. Lambert, Paul C. Estimating causal effects in the presence of competing events using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv |
title | Estimating causal effects in the presence of competing events using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv |
title_full | Estimating causal effects in the presence of competing events using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv |
title_fullStr | Estimating causal effects in the presence of competing events using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating causal effects in the presence of competing events using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv |
title_short | Estimating causal effects in the presence of competing events using regression standardisation with the Stata command standsurv |
title_sort | estimating causal effects in the presence of competing events using regression standardisation with the stata command standsurv |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35963987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01666-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT syriopoulouelisavet estimatingcausaleffectsinthepresenceofcompetingeventsusingregressionstandardisationwiththestatacommandstandsurv AT mozumdersarwari estimatingcausaleffectsinthepresenceofcompetingeventsusingregressionstandardisationwiththestatacommandstandsurv AT rutherfordmarkj estimatingcausaleffectsinthepresenceofcompetingeventsusingregressionstandardisationwiththestatacommandstandsurv AT lambertpaulc estimatingcausaleffectsinthepresenceofcompetingeventsusingregressionstandardisationwiththestatacommandstandsurv |