Cargando…

Exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

PURPOSE: Of the 80% people with psychosis living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), up to 90% are left to the care of families. The World Health Organization has recommended the inclusion of families in community-based rehabilitation and while there is evidence of its implementation in LMI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morillo, Hannah, Lowry, Sophie, Henderson, Claire
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35699742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-022-02309-8
_version_ 1784768026814447616
author Morillo, Hannah
Lowry, Sophie
Henderson, Claire
author_facet Morillo, Hannah
Lowry, Sophie
Henderson, Claire
author_sort Morillo, Hannah
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Of the 80% people with psychosis living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), up to 90% are left to the care of families. The World Health Organization has recommended the inclusion of families in community-based rehabilitation and while there is evidence of its implementation in LMICs, this has not been reviewed yet. This study aims to describe the key features and implementation strategies of family-based interventions in LMICs, and appraise their effectiveness. METHODS: Included are people with psychosis in LMICs who receive any form of family-based intervention, compared to their usual or absence of treatment, with patient outcome measures. We searched (August 2021) through Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health, PsycInfo, Social Policy and Practice, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), as well as from grey literature and hand-searched records. Risk of bias was assessed through the Integrated Quality Criteria for Review of Multiple Study Designs (ICROMS) and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS), then analyzed narratively. RESULTS: 27 studies were included from the 5254 records. Psychotherapeutic features, systems approach and task-sharing were key intervention elements. Delivery strategies included preliminary research, sustained family engagement, and cultural adaptation. There were positive health impacts across four outcome domains. CONCLUSION: All studies recommended family-based interventions, with limitations in heterogeneity and 70% of them rated high risk of bias. OTHER: Review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021256856). The authors did not receive funding for this research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00127-022-02309-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9375736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93757362022-08-15 Exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review Morillo, Hannah Lowry, Sophie Henderson, Claire Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Original Paper PURPOSE: Of the 80% people with psychosis living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), up to 90% are left to the care of families. The World Health Organization has recommended the inclusion of families in community-based rehabilitation and while there is evidence of its implementation in LMICs, this has not been reviewed yet. This study aims to describe the key features and implementation strategies of family-based interventions in LMICs, and appraise their effectiveness. METHODS: Included are people with psychosis in LMICs who receive any form of family-based intervention, compared to their usual or absence of treatment, with patient outcome measures. We searched (August 2021) through Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health, PsycInfo, Social Policy and Practice, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), as well as from grey literature and hand-searched records. Risk of bias was assessed through the Integrated Quality Criteria for Review of Multiple Study Designs (ICROMS) and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS), then analyzed narratively. RESULTS: 27 studies were included from the 5254 records. Psychotherapeutic features, systems approach and task-sharing were key intervention elements. Delivery strategies included preliminary research, sustained family engagement, and cultural adaptation. There were positive health impacts across four outcome domains. CONCLUSION: All studies recommended family-based interventions, with limitations in heterogeneity and 70% of them rated high risk of bias. OTHER: Review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021256856). The authors did not receive funding for this research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00127-022-02309-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-06-14 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9375736/ /pubmed/35699742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-022-02309-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Morillo, Hannah
Lowry, Sophie
Henderson, Claire
Exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title Exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_full Exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_fullStr Exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_short Exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_sort exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35699742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-022-02309-8
work_keys_str_mv AT morillohannah exploringtheeffectivenessoffamilybasedinterventionsforpsychosisinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT lowrysophie exploringtheeffectivenessoffamilybasedinterventionsforpsychosisinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT hendersonclaire exploringtheeffectivenessoffamilybasedinterventionsforpsychosisinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview