Cargando…
Exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
PURPOSE: Of the 80% people with psychosis living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), up to 90% are left to the care of families. The World Health Organization has recommended the inclusion of families in community-based rehabilitation and while there is evidence of its implementation in LMI...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35699742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-022-02309-8 |
_version_ | 1784768026814447616 |
---|---|
author | Morillo, Hannah Lowry, Sophie Henderson, Claire |
author_facet | Morillo, Hannah Lowry, Sophie Henderson, Claire |
author_sort | Morillo, Hannah |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Of the 80% people with psychosis living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), up to 90% are left to the care of families. The World Health Organization has recommended the inclusion of families in community-based rehabilitation and while there is evidence of its implementation in LMICs, this has not been reviewed yet. This study aims to describe the key features and implementation strategies of family-based interventions in LMICs, and appraise their effectiveness. METHODS: Included are people with psychosis in LMICs who receive any form of family-based intervention, compared to their usual or absence of treatment, with patient outcome measures. We searched (August 2021) through Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health, PsycInfo, Social Policy and Practice, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), as well as from grey literature and hand-searched records. Risk of bias was assessed through the Integrated Quality Criteria for Review of Multiple Study Designs (ICROMS) and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS), then analyzed narratively. RESULTS: 27 studies were included from the 5254 records. Psychotherapeutic features, systems approach and task-sharing were key intervention elements. Delivery strategies included preliminary research, sustained family engagement, and cultural adaptation. There were positive health impacts across four outcome domains. CONCLUSION: All studies recommended family-based interventions, with limitations in heterogeneity and 70% of them rated high risk of bias. OTHER: Review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021256856). The authors did not receive funding for this research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00127-022-02309-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9375736 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93757362022-08-15 Exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review Morillo, Hannah Lowry, Sophie Henderson, Claire Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Original Paper PURPOSE: Of the 80% people with psychosis living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), up to 90% are left to the care of families. The World Health Organization has recommended the inclusion of families in community-based rehabilitation and while there is evidence of its implementation in LMICs, this has not been reviewed yet. This study aims to describe the key features and implementation strategies of family-based interventions in LMICs, and appraise their effectiveness. METHODS: Included are people with psychosis in LMICs who receive any form of family-based intervention, compared to their usual or absence of treatment, with patient outcome measures. We searched (August 2021) through Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health, PsycInfo, Social Policy and Practice, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), as well as from grey literature and hand-searched records. Risk of bias was assessed through the Integrated Quality Criteria for Review of Multiple Study Designs (ICROMS) and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS), then analyzed narratively. RESULTS: 27 studies were included from the 5254 records. Psychotherapeutic features, systems approach and task-sharing were key intervention elements. Delivery strategies included preliminary research, sustained family engagement, and cultural adaptation. There were positive health impacts across four outcome domains. CONCLUSION: All studies recommended family-based interventions, with limitations in heterogeneity and 70% of them rated high risk of bias. OTHER: Review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021256856). The authors did not receive funding for this research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00127-022-02309-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-06-14 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9375736/ /pubmed/35699742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-022-02309-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Morillo, Hannah Lowry, Sophie Henderson, Claire Exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review |
title | Exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review |
title_full | Exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review |
title_short | Exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review |
title_sort | exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35699742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00127-022-02309-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morillohannah exploringtheeffectivenessoffamilybasedinterventionsforpsychosisinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview AT lowrysophie exploringtheeffectivenessoffamilybasedinterventionsforpsychosisinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview AT hendersonclaire exploringtheeffectivenessoffamilybasedinterventionsforpsychosisinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview |