Cargando…

Poor long-term recovery after critical COVID-19 during 12 months longitudinal follow-up()

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the burden of illness and impact on health and working situation among former intensive care patients treated for COVID-19. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed at one intensive care unit of a university hospital in Sweden during the first wave o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larsson, Ing-Marie, Hultström, Michael, Lipcsey, Miklos, Frithiof, Robert, Rubertsson, Sten, Wallin, Ewa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9376301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36028412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103311
_version_ 1784768136760786944
author Larsson, Ing-Marie
Hultström, Michael
Lipcsey, Miklos
Frithiof, Robert
Rubertsson, Sten
Wallin, Ewa
author_facet Larsson, Ing-Marie
Hultström, Michael
Lipcsey, Miklos
Frithiof, Robert
Rubertsson, Sten
Wallin, Ewa
author_sort Larsson, Ing-Marie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the burden of illness and impact on health and working situation among former intensive care patients treated for COVID-19. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed at one intensive care unit of a university hospital in Sweden during the first wave of COVID-19 in spring 2020. The burden of illness in health status, cognitive, physical, and psychological outcomes, and working situation were assessed at four and 12 months after discharge from intensive care, using nine validated instruments. RESULTS: Forty-six participants treated for COVID-19 participated in both follow-ups and were included in this study. General fatigue was reported by 37 of 46 participants (82%) at both follow-ups (p = 1.000). For overall health status 28 (61%) participants at the first follow-up and 26 (57%) (p = 0.414) at the second reported lower values than the general population. Cognitive impairment was seen in 22 (52%) participants at four months and in 13 (31%) at 12 months (p = 0.029). The proportion of participants on sick-leave decreased between the first and second follow-up (24% vs 13%, p = 0.025), but the proportion of participants working full-time was almost the same at both follow-ups (35% vs 37%, p = 0.317). CONCLUSIONS: The burden of illness of patients treated in intensive care due to COVID-19 included cognitive, physical, and psychological impacts. Cognitive functions were improved after 12 months, but no clear improvements could be distinguished in the physical or psychological outcome. Higher burden of illness was associated with inability to return to work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9376301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93763012022-08-15 Poor long-term recovery after critical COVID-19 during 12 months longitudinal follow-up() Larsson, Ing-Marie Hultström, Michael Lipcsey, Miklos Frithiof, Robert Rubertsson, Sten Wallin, Ewa Intensive Crit Care Nurs Research Article OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the burden of illness and impact on health and working situation among former intensive care patients treated for COVID-19. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed at one intensive care unit of a university hospital in Sweden during the first wave of COVID-19 in spring 2020. The burden of illness in health status, cognitive, physical, and psychological outcomes, and working situation were assessed at four and 12 months after discharge from intensive care, using nine validated instruments. RESULTS: Forty-six participants treated for COVID-19 participated in both follow-ups and were included in this study. General fatigue was reported by 37 of 46 participants (82%) at both follow-ups (p = 1.000). For overall health status 28 (61%) participants at the first follow-up and 26 (57%) (p = 0.414) at the second reported lower values than the general population. Cognitive impairment was seen in 22 (52%) participants at four months and in 13 (31%) at 12 months (p = 0.029). The proportion of participants on sick-leave decreased between the first and second follow-up (24% vs 13%, p = 0.025), but the proportion of participants working full-time was almost the same at both follow-ups (35% vs 37%, p = 0.317). CONCLUSIONS: The burden of illness of patients treated in intensive care due to COVID-19 included cognitive, physical, and psychological impacts. Cognitive functions were improved after 12 months, but no clear improvements could be distinguished in the physical or psychological outcome. Higher burden of illness was associated with inability to return to work. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023-02 2022-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9376301/ /pubmed/36028412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103311 Text en © 2022 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Research Article
Larsson, Ing-Marie
Hultström, Michael
Lipcsey, Miklos
Frithiof, Robert
Rubertsson, Sten
Wallin, Ewa
Poor long-term recovery after critical COVID-19 during 12 months longitudinal follow-up()
title Poor long-term recovery after critical COVID-19 during 12 months longitudinal follow-up()
title_full Poor long-term recovery after critical COVID-19 during 12 months longitudinal follow-up()
title_fullStr Poor long-term recovery after critical COVID-19 during 12 months longitudinal follow-up()
title_full_unstemmed Poor long-term recovery after critical COVID-19 during 12 months longitudinal follow-up()
title_short Poor long-term recovery after critical COVID-19 during 12 months longitudinal follow-up()
title_sort poor long-term recovery after critical covid-19 during 12 months longitudinal follow-up()
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9376301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36028412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103311
work_keys_str_mv AT larssoningmarie poorlongtermrecoveryaftercriticalcovid19during12monthslongitudinalfollowup
AT hultstrommichael poorlongtermrecoveryaftercriticalcovid19during12monthslongitudinalfollowup
AT lipcseymiklos poorlongtermrecoveryaftercriticalcovid19during12monthslongitudinalfollowup
AT frithiofrobert poorlongtermrecoveryaftercriticalcovid19during12monthslongitudinalfollowup
AT rubertssonsten poorlongtermrecoveryaftercriticalcovid19during12monthslongitudinalfollowup
AT wallinewa poorlongtermrecoveryaftercriticalcovid19during12monthslongitudinalfollowup