Cargando…
Poor long-term recovery after critical COVID-19 during 12 months longitudinal follow-up()
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the burden of illness and impact on health and working situation among former intensive care patients treated for COVID-19. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed at one intensive care unit of a university hospital in Sweden during the first wave o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9376301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36028412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103311 |
_version_ | 1784768136760786944 |
---|---|
author | Larsson, Ing-Marie Hultström, Michael Lipcsey, Miklos Frithiof, Robert Rubertsson, Sten Wallin, Ewa |
author_facet | Larsson, Ing-Marie Hultström, Michael Lipcsey, Miklos Frithiof, Robert Rubertsson, Sten Wallin, Ewa |
author_sort | Larsson, Ing-Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the burden of illness and impact on health and working situation among former intensive care patients treated for COVID-19. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed at one intensive care unit of a university hospital in Sweden during the first wave of COVID-19 in spring 2020. The burden of illness in health status, cognitive, physical, and psychological outcomes, and working situation were assessed at four and 12 months after discharge from intensive care, using nine validated instruments. RESULTS: Forty-six participants treated for COVID-19 participated in both follow-ups and were included in this study. General fatigue was reported by 37 of 46 participants (82%) at both follow-ups (p = 1.000). For overall health status 28 (61%) participants at the first follow-up and 26 (57%) (p = 0.414) at the second reported lower values than the general population. Cognitive impairment was seen in 22 (52%) participants at four months and in 13 (31%) at 12 months (p = 0.029). The proportion of participants on sick-leave decreased between the first and second follow-up (24% vs 13%, p = 0.025), but the proportion of participants working full-time was almost the same at both follow-ups (35% vs 37%, p = 0.317). CONCLUSIONS: The burden of illness of patients treated in intensive care due to COVID-19 included cognitive, physical, and psychological impacts. Cognitive functions were improved after 12 months, but no clear improvements could be distinguished in the physical or psychological outcome. Higher burden of illness was associated with inability to return to work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9376301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93763012022-08-15 Poor long-term recovery after critical COVID-19 during 12 months longitudinal follow-up() Larsson, Ing-Marie Hultström, Michael Lipcsey, Miklos Frithiof, Robert Rubertsson, Sten Wallin, Ewa Intensive Crit Care Nurs Research Article OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the burden of illness and impact on health and working situation among former intensive care patients treated for COVID-19. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed at one intensive care unit of a university hospital in Sweden during the first wave of COVID-19 in spring 2020. The burden of illness in health status, cognitive, physical, and psychological outcomes, and working situation were assessed at four and 12 months after discharge from intensive care, using nine validated instruments. RESULTS: Forty-six participants treated for COVID-19 participated in both follow-ups and were included in this study. General fatigue was reported by 37 of 46 participants (82%) at both follow-ups (p = 1.000). For overall health status 28 (61%) participants at the first follow-up and 26 (57%) (p = 0.414) at the second reported lower values than the general population. Cognitive impairment was seen in 22 (52%) participants at four months and in 13 (31%) at 12 months (p = 0.029). The proportion of participants on sick-leave decreased between the first and second follow-up (24% vs 13%, p = 0.025), but the proportion of participants working full-time was almost the same at both follow-ups (35% vs 37%, p = 0.317). CONCLUSIONS: The burden of illness of patients treated in intensive care due to COVID-19 included cognitive, physical, and psychological impacts. Cognitive functions were improved after 12 months, but no clear improvements could be distinguished in the physical or psychological outcome. Higher burden of illness was associated with inability to return to work. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023-02 2022-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9376301/ /pubmed/36028412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103311 Text en © 2022 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Larsson, Ing-Marie Hultström, Michael Lipcsey, Miklos Frithiof, Robert Rubertsson, Sten Wallin, Ewa Poor long-term recovery after critical COVID-19 during 12 months longitudinal follow-up() |
title | Poor long-term recovery after critical COVID-19 during 12 months longitudinal follow-up() |
title_full | Poor long-term recovery after critical COVID-19 during 12 months longitudinal follow-up() |
title_fullStr | Poor long-term recovery after critical COVID-19 during 12 months longitudinal follow-up() |
title_full_unstemmed | Poor long-term recovery after critical COVID-19 during 12 months longitudinal follow-up() |
title_short | Poor long-term recovery after critical COVID-19 during 12 months longitudinal follow-up() |
title_sort | poor long-term recovery after critical covid-19 during 12 months longitudinal follow-up() |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9376301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36028412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103311 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT larssoningmarie poorlongtermrecoveryaftercriticalcovid19during12monthslongitudinalfollowup AT hultstrommichael poorlongtermrecoveryaftercriticalcovid19during12monthslongitudinalfollowup AT lipcseymiklos poorlongtermrecoveryaftercriticalcovid19during12monthslongitudinalfollowup AT frithiofrobert poorlongtermrecoveryaftercriticalcovid19during12monthslongitudinalfollowup AT rubertssonsten poorlongtermrecoveryaftercriticalcovid19during12monthslongitudinalfollowup AT wallinewa poorlongtermrecoveryaftercriticalcovid19during12monthslongitudinalfollowup |