Cargando…

Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study

PURPOSE: To evaluate microscopically whether the print quality and accuracy of sizing of Landolt ring near vision charts are adequate for the calibration of reading charts. METHODS: Near vision charts with Landolt rings from Oculus GmbH (C-Test; Wetzlar, Germany), Precision Vision (Woodstock, IL) an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radner, Wolfgang, Radner, Michael, Daxer, Barbara, Ettl, Armin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35965343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-022-00302-5
_version_ 1784768264332640256
author Radner, Wolfgang
Radner, Michael
Daxer, Barbara
Ettl, Armin
author_facet Radner, Wolfgang
Radner, Michael
Daxer, Barbara
Ettl, Armin
author_sort Radner, Wolfgang
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate microscopically whether the print quality and accuracy of sizing of Landolt ring near vision charts are adequate for the calibration of reading charts. METHODS: Near vision charts with Landolt rings from Oculus GmbH (C-Test; Wetzlar, Germany), Precision Vision (Woodstock, IL) and the RADNER Charts were examined, as well as custom-made Landolt rings optimized for print quality. Microscopic investigations and measurements were performed by using a Huvitz HSZ 600 stereomicroscope (Nikon NIS Elements software) to evaluate the height of the Landolt rings, the thickness of the lines, and the width of the openings. The deviations from the mathematically correct values, which were calculated as given in the EN/ISO 8596 and by the International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO), were analyzed (calculated for a test distance of 40 cm). RESULTS: All the near vision charts showed notable deficiencies in print quality and aberrations from the nominal values in the height, thickness of the lines, and width of the openings. The openings were too narrow, whereas the height and thickness of the lines were larger than the nominal values. Even the openings of Landolt rings optimized for print quality were not always within an acceptable 5% tolerance and need further improvement. CONCLUSION: This study reports inaccuracies in the heights, thicknesses of the lines, and widths of the openings of Landolt rings in all the near vision charts investigated. The extent of these inaccuracies excludes such near vision charts as reference tests for the calibration of reading charts. The x-height in relation to the visual angle still seems to be the most reliable method for standardizing the print sizes for reading charts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9377069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93770692022-08-16 Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study Radner, Wolfgang Radner, Michael Daxer, Barbara Ettl, Armin Eye Vis (Lond) Research PURPOSE: To evaluate microscopically whether the print quality and accuracy of sizing of Landolt ring near vision charts are adequate for the calibration of reading charts. METHODS: Near vision charts with Landolt rings from Oculus GmbH (C-Test; Wetzlar, Germany), Precision Vision (Woodstock, IL) and the RADNER Charts were examined, as well as custom-made Landolt rings optimized for print quality. Microscopic investigations and measurements were performed by using a Huvitz HSZ 600 stereomicroscope (Nikon NIS Elements software) to evaluate the height of the Landolt rings, the thickness of the lines, and the width of the openings. The deviations from the mathematically correct values, which were calculated as given in the EN/ISO 8596 and by the International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO), were analyzed (calculated for a test distance of 40 cm). RESULTS: All the near vision charts showed notable deficiencies in print quality and aberrations from the nominal values in the height, thickness of the lines, and width of the openings. The openings were too narrow, whereas the height and thickness of the lines were larger than the nominal values. Even the openings of Landolt rings optimized for print quality were not always within an acceptable 5% tolerance and need further improvement. CONCLUSION: This study reports inaccuracies in the heights, thicknesses of the lines, and widths of the openings of Landolt rings in all the near vision charts investigated. The extent of these inaccuracies excludes such near vision charts as reference tests for the calibration of reading charts. The x-height in relation to the visual angle still seems to be the most reliable method for standardizing the print sizes for reading charts. BioMed Central 2022-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9377069/ /pubmed/35965343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-022-00302-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Radner, Wolfgang
Radner, Michael
Daxer, Barbara
Ettl, Armin
Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study
title Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study
title_full Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study
title_fullStr Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study
title_full_unstemmed Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study
title_short Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study
title_sort possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the landolt ring: a microscopic study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35965343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-022-00302-5
work_keys_str_mv AT radnerwolfgang possiblelimitsofcalibratingreadingchartswiththelandoltringamicroscopicstudy
AT radnermichael possiblelimitsofcalibratingreadingchartswiththelandoltringamicroscopicstudy
AT daxerbarbara possiblelimitsofcalibratingreadingchartswiththelandoltringamicroscopicstudy
AT ettlarmin possiblelimitsofcalibratingreadingchartswiththelandoltringamicroscopicstudy