Cargando…
Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study
PURPOSE: To evaluate microscopically whether the print quality and accuracy of sizing of Landolt ring near vision charts are adequate for the calibration of reading charts. METHODS: Near vision charts with Landolt rings from Oculus GmbH (C-Test; Wetzlar, Germany), Precision Vision (Woodstock, IL) an...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35965343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-022-00302-5 |
_version_ | 1784768264332640256 |
---|---|
author | Radner, Wolfgang Radner, Michael Daxer, Barbara Ettl, Armin |
author_facet | Radner, Wolfgang Radner, Michael Daxer, Barbara Ettl, Armin |
author_sort | Radner, Wolfgang |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate microscopically whether the print quality and accuracy of sizing of Landolt ring near vision charts are adequate for the calibration of reading charts. METHODS: Near vision charts with Landolt rings from Oculus GmbH (C-Test; Wetzlar, Germany), Precision Vision (Woodstock, IL) and the RADNER Charts were examined, as well as custom-made Landolt rings optimized for print quality. Microscopic investigations and measurements were performed by using a Huvitz HSZ 600 stereomicroscope (Nikon NIS Elements software) to evaluate the height of the Landolt rings, the thickness of the lines, and the width of the openings. The deviations from the mathematically correct values, which were calculated as given in the EN/ISO 8596 and by the International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO), were analyzed (calculated for a test distance of 40 cm). RESULTS: All the near vision charts showed notable deficiencies in print quality and aberrations from the nominal values in the height, thickness of the lines, and width of the openings. The openings were too narrow, whereas the height and thickness of the lines were larger than the nominal values. Even the openings of Landolt rings optimized for print quality were not always within an acceptable 5% tolerance and need further improvement. CONCLUSION: This study reports inaccuracies in the heights, thicknesses of the lines, and widths of the openings of Landolt rings in all the near vision charts investigated. The extent of these inaccuracies excludes such near vision charts as reference tests for the calibration of reading charts. The x-height in relation to the visual angle still seems to be the most reliable method for standardizing the print sizes for reading charts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9377069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93770692022-08-16 Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study Radner, Wolfgang Radner, Michael Daxer, Barbara Ettl, Armin Eye Vis (Lond) Research PURPOSE: To evaluate microscopically whether the print quality and accuracy of sizing of Landolt ring near vision charts are adequate for the calibration of reading charts. METHODS: Near vision charts with Landolt rings from Oculus GmbH (C-Test; Wetzlar, Germany), Precision Vision (Woodstock, IL) and the RADNER Charts were examined, as well as custom-made Landolt rings optimized for print quality. Microscopic investigations and measurements were performed by using a Huvitz HSZ 600 stereomicroscope (Nikon NIS Elements software) to evaluate the height of the Landolt rings, the thickness of the lines, and the width of the openings. The deviations from the mathematically correct values, which were calculated as given in the EN/ISO 8596 and by the International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO), were analyzed (calculated for a test distance of 40 cm). RESULTS: All the near vision charts showed notable deficiencies in print quality and aberrations from the nominal values in the height, thickness of the lines, and width of the openings. The openings were too narrow, whereas the height and thickness of the lines were larger than the nominal values. Even the openings of Landolt rings optimized for print quality were not always within an acceptable 5% tolerance and need further improvement. CONCLUSION: This study reports inaccuracies in the heights, thicknesses of the lines, and widths of the openings of Landolt rings in all the near vision charts investigated. The extent of these inaccuracies excludes such near vision charts as reference tests for the calibration of reading charts. The x-height in relation to the visual angle still seems to be the most reliable method for standardizing the print sizes for reading charts. BioMed Central 2022-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9377069/ /pubmed/35965343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-022-00302-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Radner, Wolfgang Radner, Michael Daxer, Barbara Ettl, Armin Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study |
title | Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study |
title_full | Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study |
title_fullStr | Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study |
title_full_unstemmed | Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study |
title_short | Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study |
title_sort | possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the landolt ring: a microscopic study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35965343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-022-00302-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT radnerwolfgang possiblelimitsofcalibratingreadingchartswiththelandoltringamicroscopicstudy AT radnermichael possiblelimitsofcalibratingreadingchartswiththelandoltringamicroscopicstudy AT daxerbarbara possiblelimitsofcalibratingreadingchartswiththelandoltringamicroscopicstudy AT ettlarmin possiblelimitsofcalibratingreadingchartswiththelandoltringamicroscopicstudy |