Cargando…

Development and validation of a predictive model to identify the active phase of labor

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of the active phase of labor is a crucial clinical decision, thus requiring an accurate assessment. This study aimed to build and to validate a predictive model, based on maternal signs and symptoms to identify a cervical dilatation ≥4 cm. METHODS: A prospective study was c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fumagalli, Simona, Antolini, Laura, Cosmai, Greta, Gramegna, Teresa, Nespoli, Antonella, Pedranzini, Astrid, Colciago, Elisabetta, Valsecchi, Maria Grazia, Vergani, Patrizia, Locatelli, Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35971093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04946-y
_version_ 1784768265351856128
author Fumagalli, Simona
Antolini, Laura
Cosmai, Greta
Gramegna, Teresa
Nespoli, Antonella
Pedranzini, Astrid
Colciago, Elisabetta
Valsecchi, Maria Grazia
Vergani, Patrizia
Locatelli, Anna
author_facet Fumagalli, Simona
Antolini, Laura
Cosmai, Greta
Gramegna, Teresa
Nespoli, Antonella
Pedranzini, Astrid
Colciago, Elisabetta
Valsecchi, Maria Grazia
Vergani, Patrizia
Locatelli, Anna
author_sort Fumagalli, Simona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of the active phase of labor is a crucial clinical decision, thus requiring an accurate assessment. This study aimed to build and to validate a predictive model, based on maternal signs and symptoms to identify a cervical dilatation ≥4 cm. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted from May to September 2018 in a II Level Maternity Unit (development data), and from May to September 2019 in a I Level Maternity Unit (validation data). Women with singleton, term pregnancy, cephalic presentation and presence of contractions were consecutively enrolled during the initial assessment to diagnose the stage of labor. Women < 18 years old, with language barrier or induction of labor were excluded. A nomogram for the calculation of the predictions of cervical dilatation ≥4 cm on the ground of 11 maternal signs and symptoms was obtained from a multivariate logistic model. The predictive performance of the model was investigated by internal and external validation. RESULTS: A total of 288 assessments were analyzed. All maternal signs and symptoms showed a significant impact on increasing the probability of cervical dilatation ≥4 cm. In the final logistic model, “Rhythm” (OR 6.26), “Duration” (OR 8.15) of contractions and “Show” (OR 4.29) confirmed their significance while, unexpectedly, “Frequency” of contractions had no impact. The area under the ROC curve in the model of the uterine activity was 0.865 (development data) and 0.927 (validation data), with an increment to 0.905 and 0.956, respectively, when adding maternal signs. The Brier Score error in the model of the uterine activity was 0.140 (development data) and 0.097 (validation data), with a decrement to 0.121 and 0.092, respectively, when adding maternal signs. CONCLUSION: Our predictive model showed a good performance. The introduction of a non-invasive tool might assist midwives in the decision-making process, avoiding interventions and thus offering an evidenced-base care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9377074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93770742022-08-16 Development and validation of a predictive model to identify the active phase of labor Fumagalli, Simona Antolini, Laura Cosmai, Greta Gramegna, Teresa Nespoli, Antonella Pedranzini, Astrid Colciago, Elisabetta Valsecchi, Maria Grazia Vergani, Patrizia Locatelli, Anna BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of the active phase of labor is a crucial clinical decision, thus requiring an accurate assessment. This study aimed to build and to validate a predictive model, based on maternal signs and symptoms to identify a cervical dilatation ≥4 cm. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted from May to September 2018 in a II Level Maternity Unit (development data), and from May to September 2019 in a I Level Maternity Unit (validation data). Women with singleton, term pregnancy, cephalic presentation and presence of contractions were consecutively enrolled during the initial assessment to diagnose the stage of labor. Women < 18 years old, with language barrier or induction of labor were excluded. A nomogram for the calculation of the predictions of cervical dilatation ≥4 cm on the ground of 11 maternal signs and symptoms was obtained from a multivariate logistic model. The predictive performance of the model was investigated by internal and external validation. RESULTS: A total of 288 assessments were analyzed. All maternal signs and symptoms showed a significant impact on increasing the probability of cervical dilatation ≥4 cm. In the final logistic model, “Rhythm” (OR 6.26), “Duration” (OR 8.15) of contractions and “Show” (OR 4.29) confirmed their significance while, unexpectedly, “Frequency” of contractions had no impact. The area under the ROC curve in the model of the uterine activity was 0.865 (development data) and 0.927 (validation data), with an increment to 0.905 and 0.956, respectively, when adding maternal signs. The Brier Score error in the model of the uterine activity was 0.140 (development data) and 0.097 (validation data), with a decrement to 0.121 and 0.092, respectively, when adding maternal signs. CONCLUSION: Our predictive model showed a good performance. The introduction of a non-invasive tool might assist midwives in the decision-making process, avoiding interventions and thus offering an evidenced-base care. BioMed Central 2022-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9377074/ /pubmed/35971093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04946-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Fumagalli, Simona
Antolini, Laura
Cosmai, Greta
Gramegna, Teresa
Nespoli, Antonella
Pedranzini, Astrid
Colciago, Elisabetta
Valsecchi, Maria Grazia
Vergani, Patrizia
Locatelli, Anna
Development and validation of a predictive model to identify the active phase of labor
title Development and validation of a predictive model to identify the active phase of labor
title_full Development and validation of a predictive model to identify the active phase of labor
title_fullStr Development and validation of a predictive model to identify the active phase of labor
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a predictive model to identify the active phase of labor
title_short Development and validation of a predictive model to identify the active phase of labor
title_sort development and validation of a predictive model to identify the active phase of labor
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35971093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04946-y
work_keys_str_mv AT fumagallisimona developmentandvalidationofapredictivemodeltoidentifytheactivephaseoflabor
AT antolinilaura developmentandvalidationofapredictivemodeltoidentifytheactivephaseoflabor
AT cosmaigreta developmentandvalidationofapredictivemodeltoidentifytheactivephaseoflabor
AT gramegnateresa developmentandvalidationofapredictivemodeltoidentifytheactivephaseoflabor
AT nespoliantonella developmentandvalidationofapredictivemodeltoidentifytheactivephaseoflabor
AT pedranziniastrid developmentandvalidationofapredictivemodeltoidentifytheactivephaseoflabor
AT colciagoelisabetta developmentandvalidationofapredictivemodeltoidentifytheactivephaseoflabor
AT valsecchimariagrazia developmentandvalidationofapredictivemodeltoidentifytheactivephaseoflabor
AT verganipatrizia developmentandvalidationofapredictivemodeltoidentifytheactivephaseoflabor
AT locatellianna developmentandvalidationofapredictivemodeltoidentifytheactivephaseoflabor