Cargando…

The global inhomogeneity index assessed by electrical impedance tomography overestimates PEEP requirement in patients with ARDS: an observational study

BACKGROUND: Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) visualises alveolar overdistension and alveolar collapse and enables optimisation of ventilator settings by using the best balance between alveolar overdistension and collapse (ODCL). Besides, the global inhomogeneity index (GI), measured by EIT, may...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heines, Serge J. H., de Jongh, Sebastiaan A. M., Strauch, Ulrich, van der Horst, Iwan C. C., van de Poll, Marcel C. G., Bergmans, Dennis C. J. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35971060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01801-7
_version_ 1784768278958178304
author Heines, Serge J. H.
de Jongh, Sebastiaan A. M.
Strauch, Ulrich
van der Horst, Iwan C. C.
van de Poll, Marcel C. G.
Bergmans, Dennis C. J. J.
author_facet Heines, Serge J. H.
de Jongh, Sebastiaan A. M.
Strauch, Ulrich
van der Horst, Iwan C. C.
van de Poll, Marcel C. G.
Bergmans, Dennis C. J. J.
author_sort Heines, Serge J. H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) visualises alveolar overdistension and alveolar collapse and enables optimisation of ventilator settings by using the best balance between alveolar overdistension and collapse (ODCL). Besides, the global inhomogeneity index (GI), measured by EIT, may also be of added value in determining PEEP. Optimal PEEP is often determined based on the best dynamic compliance without EIT at the bedside. This study aimed to assess the effect of a PEEP trial on ODCL, GI and dynamic compliance in patients with and without ARDS. Secondly, PEEP levels from “optimal PEEP” approaches by ODCL, GI and dynamic compliance are compared. METHODS: In 2015–2016, we included patients with ARDS using postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients as a reference group. A PEEP trial was performed with four consecutive incremental followed by four decremental PEEP steps of 2 cmH(2)O. Primary outcomes at each step were GI, ODCL and best dynamic compliance. In addition, the agreement between ODCL, GI, and dynamic compliance was determined for the individual patient. RESULTS: Twenty-eight ARDS and 17 postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients were included. The mean optimal PEEP, according to best compliance, was 10.3 (±2.9) cmH(2)O in ARDS compared to 9.8 (±2.5) cmH(2)O in cardiothoracic surgery patients. Optimal PEEP according to ODCL was 10.9 (±2.5) in ARDS and 9.6 (±1.6) in cardiothoracic surgery patients. Optimal PEEP according to GI was 17.1 (±3.9) in ARDS compared to 14.2 (±3.4) in cardiothoracic surgery patients. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, no golden standard to titrate PEEP is available. We showed that when using the GI, PEEP requirements are higher compared to ODCL and best dynamic compliance during a PEEP trial in patients with and without ARDS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01801-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9377133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93771332022-08-16 The global inhomogeneity index assessed by electrical impedance tomography overestimates PEEP requirement in patients with ARDS: an observational study Heines, Serge J. H. de Jongh, Sebastiaan A. M. Strauch, Ulrich van der Horst, Iwan C. C. van de Poll, Marcel C. G. Bergmans, Dennis C. J. J. BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) visualises alveolar overdistension and alveolar collapse and enables optimisation of ventilator settings by using the best balance between alveolar overdistension and collapse (ODCL). Besides, the global inhomogeneity index (GI), measured by EIT, may also be of added value in determining PEEP. Optimal PEEP is often determined based on the best dynamic compliance without EIT at the bedside. This study aimed to assess the effect of a PEEP trial on ODCL, GI and dynamic compliance in patients with and without ARDS. Secondly, PEEP levels from “optimal PEEP” approaches by ODCL, GI and dynamic compliance are compared. METHODS: In 2015–2016, we included patients with ARDS using postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients as a reference group. A PEEP trial was performed with four consecutive incremental followed by four decremental PEEP steps of 2 cmH(2)O. Primary outcomes at each step were GI, ODCL and best dynamic compliance. In addition, the agreement between ODCL, GI, and dynamic compliance was determined for the individual patient. RESULTS: Twenty-eight ARDS and 17 postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients were included. The mean optimal PEEP, according to best compliance, was 10.3 (±2.9) cmH(2)O in ARDS compared to 9.8 (±2.5) cmH(2)O in cardiothoracic surgery patients. Optimal PEEP according to ODCL was 10.9 (±2.5) in ARDS and 9.6 (±1.6) in cardiothoracic surgery patients. Optimal PEEP according to GI was 17.1 (±3.9) in ARDS compared to 14.2 (±3.4) in cardiothoracic surgery patients. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, no golden standard to titrate PEEP is available. We showed that when using the GI, PEEP requirements are higher compared to ODCL and best dynamic compliance during a PEEP trial in patients with and without ARDS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01801-7. BioMed Central 2022-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9377133/ /pubmed/35971060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01801-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Heines, Serge J. H.
de Jongh, Sebastiaan A. M.
Strauch, Ulrich
van der Horst, Iwan C. C.
van de Poll, Marcel C. G.
Bergmans, Dennis C. J. J.
The global inhomogeneity index assessed by electrical impedance tomography overestimates PEEP requirement in patients with ARDS: an observational study
title The global inhomogeneity index assessed by electrical impedance tomography overestimates PEEP requirement in patients with ARDS: an observational study
title_full The global inhomogeneity index assessed by electrical impedance tomography overestimates PEEP requirement in patients with ARDS: an observational study
title_fullStr The global inhomogeneity index assessed by electrical impedance tomography overestimates PEEP requirement in patients with ARDS: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed The global inhomogeneity index assessed by electrical impedance tomography overestimates PEEP requirement in patients with ARDS: an observational study
title_short The global inhomogeneity index assessed by electrical impedance tomography overestimates PEEP requirement in patients with ARDS: an observational study
title_sort global inhomogeneity index assessed by electrical impedance tomography overestimates peep requirement in patients with ards: an observational study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35971060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01801-7
work_keys_str_mv AT heinessergejh theglobalinhomogeneityindexassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyoverestimatespeeprequirementinpatientswithardsanobservationalstudy
AT dejonghsebastiaanam theglobalinhomogeneityindexassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyoverestimatespeeprequirementinpatientswithardsanobservationalstudy
AT strauchulrich theglobalinhomogeneityindexassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyoverestimatespeeprequirementinpatientswithardsanobservationalstudy
AT vanderhorstiwancc theglobalinhomogeneityindexassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyoverestimatespeeprequirementinpatientswithardsanobservationalstudy
AT vandepollmarcelcg theglobalinhomogeneityindexassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyoverestimatespeeprequirementinpatientswithardsanobservationalstudy
AT bergmansdenniscjj theglobalinhomogeneityindexassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyoverestimatespeeprequirementinpatientswithardsanobservationalstudy
AT heinessergejh globalinhomogeneityindexassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyoverestimatespeeprequirementinpatientswithardsanobservationalstudy
AT dejonghsebastiaanam globalinhomogeneityindexassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyoverestimatespeeprequirementinpatientswithardsanobservationalstudy
AT strauchulrich globalinhomogeneityindexassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyoverestimatespeeprequirementinpatientswithardsanobservationalstudy
AT vanderhorstiwancc globalinhomogeneityindexassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyoverestimatespeeprequirementinpatientswithardsanobservationalstudy
AT vandepollmarcelcg globalinhomogeneityindexassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyoverestimatespeeprequirementinpatientswithardsanobservationalstudy
AT bergmansdenniscjj globalinhomogeneityindexassessedbyelectricalimpedancetomographyoverestimatespeeprequirementinpatientswithardsanobservationalstudy