Cargando…

Comparison of three different strategies to treat sciatic nerve regeneration: an experimental study

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of vein conduit filled with adipose tissue stem cells (ASC) on peripheral nerve injury regeneration. METHODS: We analyzed 30 male Wistar rats surgically submitted to a 5-mm gap on the sciatic nerve. Then, the animals were divided into three groups: nerve autografting (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smaniotto, Pedro Henrique, Camargo, Cristina Pires, Kubrusly, Marcia Saldanha, Gemperli, Rolf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35976339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb370501
_version_ 1784768291165700096
author Smaniotto, Pedro Henrique
Camargo, Cristina Pires
Kubrusly, Marcia Saldanha
Gemperli, Rolf
author_facet Smaniotto, Pedro Henrique
Camargo, Cristina Pires
Kubrusly, Marcia Saldanha
Gemperli, Rolf
author_sort Smaniotto, Pedro Henrique
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the effect of vein conduit filled with adipose tissue stem cells (ASC) on peripheral nerve injury regeneration. METHODS: We analyzed 30 male Wistar rats surgically submitted to a 5-mm gap on the sciatic nerve. Then, the animals were divided into three groups: nerve autografting (AG, n=10), autogenous inverted glycerol-conserved vein (VG, n=10), and autogenous inverted glycerol-conserved vein + ASC (VASCG, n=10). The study endpoints were neuromotor functional analysis, gastrocnemius muscle weight, and sciatic nerve graft histomorphometry analysis. In the histologic analysis, we added a control group (naïve nerve). RESULTS: Regarding functional analysis (Walking tract- score), the findings at week 3 showed a difference between the AG and the VG (-96.6 vs. -59.6, p=0.01, respectively) and between the VG and the inverted vein + VASCG (-59.9 vs. -88.92, p=0.02). At week 12, this study showed a difference between the AG and the VG (-64.8 vs. -47.3, p=0.004, respectively), and also a difference between the VG and the VASCG (-47.3 vs. -57.4, p=0.02, respectively). There was no difference in the histomorphometry analysis (nerve diameter, Schwann cells counting). The gastrocnemius muscles on the intervention side were more atrophic when compared to the gastrocnemius muscles on the control side. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested better functional recovery in the inverted vein group when compared to control group, and inverted vein + ASC group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9377207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93772072022-08-18 Comparison of three different strategies to treat sciatic nerve regeneration: an experimental study Smaniotto, Pedro Henrique Camargo, Cristina Pires Kubrusly, Marcia Saldanha Gemperli, Rolf Acta Cir Bras Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the effect of vein conduit filled with adipose tissue stem cells (ASC) on peripheral nerve injury regeneration. METHODS: We analyzed 30 male Wistar rats surgically submitted to a 5-mm gap on the sciatic nerve. Then, the animals were divided into three groups: nerve autografting (AG, n=10), autogenous inverted glycerol-conserved vein (VG, n=10), and autogenous inverted glycerol-conserved vein + ASC (VASCG, n=10). The study endpoints were neuromotor functional analysis, gastrocnemius muscle weight, and sciatic nerve graft histomorphometry analysis. In the histologic analysis, we added a control group (naïve nerve). RESULTS: Regarding functional analysis (Walking tract- score), the findings at week 3 showed a difference between the AG and the VG (-96.6 vs. -59.6, p=0.01, respectively) and between the VG and the inverted vein + VASCG (-59.9 vs. -88.92, p=0.02). At week 12, this study showed a difference between the AG and the VG (-64.8 vs. -47.3, p=0.004, respectively), and also a difference between the VG and the VASCG (-47.3 vs. -57.4, p=0.02, respectively). There was no difference in the histomorphometry analysis (nerve diameter, Schwann cells counting). The gastrocnemius muscles on the intervention side were more atrophic when compared to the gastrocnemius muscles on the control side. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested better functional recovery in the inverted vein group when compared to control group, and inverted vein + ASC group. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9377207/ /pubmed/35976339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb370501 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Smaniotto, Pedro Henrique
Camargo, Cristina Pires
Kubrusly, Marcia Saldanha
Gemperli, Rolf
Comparison of three different strategies to treat sciatic nerve regeneration: an experimental study
title Comparison of three different strategies to treat sciatic nerve regeneration: an experimental study
title_full Comparison of three different strategies to treat sciatic nerve regeneration: an experimental study
title_fullStr Comparison of three different strategies to treat sciatic nerve regeneration: an experimental study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three different strategies to treat sciatic nerve regeneration: an experimental study
title_short Comparison of three different strategies to treat sciatic nerve regeneration: an experimental study
title_sort comparison of three different strategies to treat sciatic nerve regeneration: an experimental study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35976339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb370501
work_keys_str_mv AT smaniottopedrohenrique comparisonofthreedifferentstrategiestotreatsciaticnerveregenerationanexperimentalstudy
AT camargocristinapires comparisonofthreedifferentstrategiestotreatsciaticnerveregenerationanexperimentalstudy
AT kubruslymarciasaldanha comparisonofthreedifferentstrategiestotreatsciaticnerveregenerationanexperimentalstudy
AT gemperlirolf comparisonofthreedifferentstrategiestotreatsciaticnerveregenerationanexperimentalstudy