Cargando…

Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly malignant disease with poor prognosis, and most cases were already considered unresectable at the time of presentation. Conversion therapy, as an emerging treatment, is designed to provide patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Weiwei, Pei, Yinxuan, Wang, Zixiang, Liu, Jinlong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35978834
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.930868
_version_ 1784768354868789248
author Li, Weiwei
Pei, Yinxuan
Wang, Zixiang
Liu, Jinlong
author_facet Li, Weiwei
Pei, Yinxuan
Wang, Zixiang
Liu, Jinlong
author_sort Li, Weiwei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly malignant disease with poor prognosis, and most cases were already considered unresectable at the time of presentation. Conversion therapy, as an emerging treatment, is designed to provide patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) the opportunity to undergo radical resection. At present, conversion therapy for patients with uHCC remains controversial. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is currently the most widely selected treatment for uHCC, but its efficacy as a conversion therapy remains controversial. METHODS: We compared and evaluated the conversion rate for and tumor response to TACE monotherapy or combination therapy. Meanwhile, postoperative complications and overall survival (OS) in uHCC patients who underwent conversion therapy were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The conversion rate for triple therapy [TACE in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)] was 42% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29–0.56], higher than any other group [TACE monotherapy: 10% (95% CI, 0.08–0.12), bigeminy therapy: 19% (95% CI, 0.06–0.36)]. Meanwhile, triple therapy yielded a better tumor response than TACE monotherapy or bigeminy therapy. Among the patients with successful surgical resection after conversion therapy, the pooled postoperative OS rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 90% (95% CI, 0.81–0.97), 58% (95% CI, 0.42–0.73), and 42% (95% CI, 0.26–0.60), respectively, and the major postoperative complications were biliary leakage (7%; 95% CI, 0.03–0.12) and liver failure (3%; 95% CI, 0.00–0.07). CONCLUSION: TACE conversion therapies showed good conversion rates, especially the triple therapy of TACE in combination with TKIs and ICIs. Surgical resection after successful conversion therapy could maximize the outcome of patients with uHCC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9377519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93775192022-08-16 Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis Li, Weiwei Pei, Yinxuan Wang, Zixiang Liu, Jinlong Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly malignant disease with poor prognosis, and most cases were already considered unresectable at the time of presentation. Conversion therapy, as an emerging treatment, is designed to provide patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) the opportunity to undergo radical resection. At present, conversion therapy for patients with uHCC remains controversial. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is currently the most widely selected treatment for uHCC, but its efficacy as a conversion therapy remains controversial. METHODS: We compared and evaluated the conversion rate for and tumor response to TACE monotherapy or combination therapy. Meanwhile, postoperative complications and overall survival (OS) in uHCC patients who underwent conversion therapy were also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The conversion rate for triple therapy [TACE in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)] was 42% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29–0.56], higher than any other group [TACE monotherapy: 10% (95% CI, 0.08–0.12), bigeminy therapy: 19% (95% CI, 0.06–0.36)]. Meanwhile, triple therapy yielded a better tumor response than TACE monotherapy or bigeminy therapy. Among the patients with successful surgical resection after conversion therapy, the pooled postoperative OS rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 90% (95% CI, 0.81–0.97), 58% (95% CI, 0.42–0.73), and 42% (95% CI, 0.26–0.60), respectively, and the major postoperative complications were biliary leakage (7%; 95% CI, 0.03–0.12) and liver failure (3%; 95% CI, 0.00–0.07). CONCLUSION: TACE conversion therapies showed good conversion rates, especially the triple therapy of TACE in combination with TKIs and ICIs. Surgical resection after successful conversion therapy could maximize the outcome of patients with uHCC. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9377519/ /pubmed/35978834 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.930868 Text en Copyright © 2022 Li, Pei, Wang and Liu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Li, Weiwei
Pei, Yinxuan
Wang, Zixiang
Liu, Jinlong
Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy or combination conversion therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35978834
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.930868
work_keys_str_mv AT liweiwei efficacyoftransarterialchemoembolizationmonotherapyorcombinationconversiontherapyinunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT peiyinxuan efficacyoftransarterialchemoembolizationmonotherapyorcombinationconversiontherapyinunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangzixiang efficacyoftransarterialchemoembolizationmonotherapyorcombinationconversiontherapyinunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liujinlong efficacyoftransarterialchemoembolizationmonotherapyorcombinationconversiontherapyinunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis