Cargando…

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Oncology Practice: Findings of an ASCO Survey

Lack of collection of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data in oncology practices limits assessment of sexual and gender minority (SGM) cancer patients' experiences and restricts opportunities to improve health outcomes of SGM patients. Despite national calls for routine SOGI data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamen, Charles S., Pratt-Chapman, Mandi L., Meersman, Stephen C., Quinn, Gwendolyn P., Schabath, Matthew B., Maingi, Shail, Merrill, Janette K., Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth, Kaltenbaugh, Melinda, Schenkel, Caroline, Chang, Shine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35605183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/OP.22.00084
_version_ 1784768390993281024
author Kamen, Charles S.
Pratt-Chapman, Mandi L.
Meersman, Stephen C.
Quinn, Gwendolyn P.
Schabath, Matthew B.
Maingi, Shail
Merrill, Janette K.
Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth
Kaltenbaugh, Melinda
Schenkel, Caroline
Chang, Shine
author_facet Kamen, Charles S.
Pratt-Chapman, Mandi L.
Meersman, Stephen C.
Quinn, Gwendolyn P.
Schabath, Matthew B.
Maingi, Shail
Merrill, Janette K.
Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth
Kaltenbaugh, Melinda
Schenkel, Caroline
Chang, Shine
author_sort Kamen, Charles S.
collection PubMed
description Lack of collection of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data in oncology practices limits assessment of sexual and gender minority (SGM) cancer patients' experiences and restricts opportunities to improve health outcomes of SGM patients. Despite national calls for routine SOGI data collection, individual-level and institutional barriers hinder progress. This study aimed to identify these barriers in oncology. METHODS: An online survey of ASCO members and others assessed SOGI data collection in oncology practices, institutional characteristics related to SOGI data collection, respondents' attitudes about SOGI data and SGM patients, and respondent demographics. Logistic regression calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for factors associated with sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI) data collection. RESULTS: Less than half of 257 respondents reported institutional SO and GI data collection (40% and 46%, respectively), whereas over a third reported no institutional data collection (34% and 32%, respectively) and the remainder were unsure (21% and 17%, respectively). Most respondents felt that knowing both SO and GI was important for quality care (77% and 85%, respectively). Collection of SO and GI was significantly associated in separate models with leadership support (ORs = 8.01 and 6.02, respectively), having resources for SOGI data collection (ORs = 10.6 and 18.7, respectively), and respondents' belief that knowing patient SO and GI is important (ORs = 4.28 and 2.76, respectively). Themes from qualitative comments mirrored the key factors identified in our quantitative analysis. CONCLUSION: Three self-reinforcing factors emerged as critical drivers for collecting SOGI data: leadership support, dedicated resources, and individual respondents' attitudes. Policy mandates, implementation science, and clinical reimbursement are strategies to advance meaningful data collection and use in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9377687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93776872022-08-16 Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Oncology Practice: Findings of an ASCO Survey Kamen, Charles S. Pratt-Chapman, Mandi L. Meersman, Stephen C. Quinn, Gwendolyn P. Schabath, Matthew B. Maingi, Shail Merrill, Janette K. Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth Kaltenbaugh, Melinda Schenkel, Caroline Chang, Shine JCO Oncol Pract ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS Lack of collection of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data in oncology practices limits assessment of sexual and gender minority (SGM) cancer patients' experiences and restricts opportunities to improve health outcomes of SGM patients. Despite national calls for routine SOGI data collection, individual-level and institutional barriers hinder progress. This study aimed to identify these barriers in oncology. METHODS: An online survey of ASCO members and others assessed SOGI data collection in oncology practices, institutional characteristics related to SOGI data collection, respondents' attitudes about SOGI data and SGM patients, and respondent demographics. Logistic regression calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for factors associated with sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI) data collection. RESULTS: Less than half of 257 respondents reported institutional SO and GI data collection (40% and 46%, respectively), whereas over a third reported no institutional data collection (34% and 32%, respectively) and the remainder were unsure (21% and 17%, respectively). Most respondents felt that knowing both SO and GI was important for quality care (77% and 85%, respectively). Collection of SO and GI was significantly associated in separate models with leadership support (ORs = 8.01 and 6.02, respectively), having resources for SOGI data collection (ORs = 10.6 and 18.7, respectively), and respondents' belief that knowing patient SO and GI is important (ORs = 4.28 and 2.76, respectively). Themes from qualitative comments mirrored the key factors identified in our quantitative analysis. CONCLUSION: Three self-reinforcing factors emerged as critical drivers for collecting SOGI data: leadership support, dedicated resources, and individual respondents' attitudes. Policy mandates, implementation science, and clinical reimbursement are strategies to advance meaningful data collection and use in clinical practice. Wolters Kluwer Health 2022-08 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9377687/ /pubmed/35605183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/OP.22.00084 Text en © 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
Kamen, Charles S.
Pratt-Chapman, Mandi L.
Meersman, Stephen C.
Quinn, Gwendolyn P.
Schabath, Matthew B.
Maingi, Shail
Merrill, Janette K.
Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth
Kaltenbaugh, Melinda
Schenkel, Caroline
Chang, Shine
Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Oncology Practice: Findings of an ASCO Survey
title Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Oncology Practice: Findings of an ASCO Survey
title_full Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Oncology Practice: Findings of an ASCO Survey
title_fullStr Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Oncology Practice: Findings of an ASCO Survey
title_full_unstemmed Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Oncology Practice: Findings of an ASCO Survey
title_short Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Oncology Practice: Findings of an ASCO Survey
title_sort sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in oncology practice: findings of an asco survey
topic ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35605183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/OP.22.00084
work_keys_str_mv AT kamencharless sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey
AT prattchapmanmandil sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey
AT meersmanstephenc sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey
AT quinngwendolynp sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey
AT schabathmatthewb sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey
AT maingishail sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey
AT merrilljanettek sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey
AT garrettmayerelizabeth sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey
AT kaltenbaughmelinda sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey
AT schenkelcaroline sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey
AT changshine sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey