Cargando…
Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Oncology Practice: Findings of an ASCO Survey
Lack of collection of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data in oncology practices limits assessment of sexual and gender minority (SGM) cancer patients' experiences and restricts opportunities to improve health outcomes of SGM patients. Despite national calls for routine SOGI data...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35605183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/OP.22.00084 |
_version_ | 1784768390993281024 |
---|---|
author | Kamen, Charles S. Pratt-Chapman, Mandi L. Meersman, Stephen C. Quinn, Gwendolyn P. Schabath, Matthew B. Maingi, Shail Merrill, Janette K. Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth Kaltenbaugh, Melinda Schenkel, Caroline Chang, Shine |
author_facet | Kamen, Charles S. Pratt-Chapman, Mandi L. Meersman, Stephen C. Quinn, Gwendolyn P. Schabath, Matthew B. Maingi, Shail Merrill, Janette K. Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth Kaltenbaugh, Melinda Schenkel, Caroline Chang, Shine |
author_sort | Kamen, Charles S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lack of collection of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data in oncology practices limits assessment of sexual and gender minority (SGM) cancer patients' experiences and restricts opportunities to improve health outcomes of SGM patients. Despite national calls for routine SOGI data collection, individual-level and institutional barriers hinder progress. This study aimed to identify these barriers in oncology. METHODS: An online survey of ASCO members and others assessed SOGI data collection in oncology practices, institutional characteristics related to SOGI data collection, respondents' attitudes about SOGI data and SGM patients, and respondent demographics. Logistic regression calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for factors associated with sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI) data collection. RESULTS: Less than half of 257 respondents reported institutional SO and GI data collection (40% and 46%, respectively), whereas over a third reported no institutional data collection (34% and 32%, respectively) and the remainder were unsure (21% and 17%, respectively). Most respondents felt that knowing both SO and GI was important for quality care (77% and 85%, respectively). Collection of SO and GI was significantly associated in separate models with leadership support (ORs = 8.01 and 6.02, respectively), having resources for SOGI data collection (ORs = 10.6 and 18.7, respectively), and respondents' belief that knowing patient SO and GI is important (ORs = 4.28 and 2.76, respectively). Themes from qualitative comments mirrored the key factors identified in our quantitative analysis. CONCLUSION: Three self-reinforcing factors emerged as critical drivers for collecting SOGI data: leadership support, dedicated resources, and individual respondents' attitudes. Policy mandates, implementation science, and clinical reimbursement are strategies to advance meaningful data collection and use in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9377687 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93776872022-08-16 Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Oncology Practice: Findings of an ASCO Survey Kamen, Charles S. Pratt-Chapman, Mandi L. Meersman, Stephen C. Quinn, Gwendolyn P. Schabath, Matthew B. Maingi, Shail Merrill, Janette K. Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth Kaltenbaugh, Melinda Schenkel, Caroline Chang, Shine JCO Oncol Pract ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS Lack of collection of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data in oncology practices limits assessment of sexual and gender minority (SGM) cancer patients' experiences and restricts opportunities to improve health outcomes of SGM patients. Despite national calls for routine SOGI data collection, individual-level and institutional barriers hinder progress. This study aimed to identify these barriers in oncology. METHODS: An online survey of ASCO members and others assessed SOGI data collection in oncology practices, institutional characteristics related to SOGI data collection, respondents' attitudes about SOGI data and SGM patients, and respondent demographics. Logistic regression calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for factors associated with sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI) data collection. RESULTS: Less than half of 257 respondents reported institutional SO and GI data collection (40% and 46%, respectively), whereas over a third reported no institutional data collection (34% and 32%, respectively) and the remainder were unsure (21% and 17%, respectively). Most respondents felt that knowing both SO and GI was important for quality care (77% and 85%, respectively). Collection of SO and GI was significantly associated in separate models with leadership support (ORs = 8.01 and 6.02, respectively), having resources for SOGI data collection (ORs = 10.6 and 18.7, respectively), and respondents' belief that knowing patient SO and GI is important (ORs = 4.28 and 2.76, respectively). Themes from qualitative comments mirrored the key factors identified in our quantitative analysis. CONCLUSION: Three self-reinforcing factors emerged as critical drivers for collecting SOGI data: leadership support, dedicated resources, and individual respondents' attitudes. Policy mandates, implementation science, and clinical reimbursement are strategies to advance meaningful data collection and use in clinical practice. Wolters Kluwer Health 2022-08 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9377687/ /pubmed/35605183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/OP.22.00084 Text en © 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS Kamen, Charles S. Pratt-Chapman, Mandi L. Meersman, Stephen C. Quinn, Gwendolyn P. Schabath, Matthew B. Maingi, Shail Merrill, Janette K. Garrett-Mayer, Elizabeth Kaltenbaugh, Melinda Schenkel, Caroline Chang, Shine Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Oncology Practice: Findings of an ASCO Survey |
title | Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Oncology Practice: Findings of an ASCO Survey |
title_full | Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Oncology Practice: Findings of an ASCO Survey |
title_fullStr | Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Oncology Practice: Findings of an ASCO Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Oncology Practice: Findings of an ASCO Survey |
title_short | Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection in Oncology Practice: Findings of an ASCO Survey |
title_sort | sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in oncology practice: findings of an asco survey |
topic | ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35605183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/OP.22.00084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kamencharless sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey AT prattchapmanmandil sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey AT meersmanstephenc sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey AT quinngwendolynp sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey AT schabathmatthewb sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey AT maingishail sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey AT merrilljanettek sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey AT garrettmayerelizabeth sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey AT kaltenbaughmelinda sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey AT schenkelcaroline sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey AT changshine sexualorientationandgenderidentitydatacollectioninoncologypracticefindingsofanascosurvey |