Cargando…

Persistence of ctDNA in Patients with Breast Cancer During Neoadjuvant Treatment Is a Significant Predictor of Poor Tumor Response

PURPOSE: Accurate response assessment during neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) poses a clinical challenge. Therefore, a minimally invasive assessment of tumor response based on cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may be beneficial to guide treatment decisions. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We profiled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Qing, Gampenrieder, Simon P., Frantal, Sophie, Rinnerthaler, Gabriel, Singer, Christian F., Egle, Daniel, Pfeiler, Georg, Bartsch, Rupert, Wette, Viktor, Pichler, Angelika, Petru, Edgar, Dubsky, Peter C., Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna, Fesl, Christian, Rudas, Margaretha, Ståhlberg, Anders, Graf, Ricarda, Weber, Sabrina, Dandachi, Nadia, Filipits, Martin, Gnant, Michael, Balic, Marija, Heitzer, Ellen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for Cancer Research 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34862246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3231
_version_ 1784768399582167040
author Zhou, Qing
Gampenrieder, Simon P.
Frantal, Sophie
Rinnerthaler, Gabriel
Singer, Christian F.
Egle, Daniel
Pfeiler, Georg
Bartsch, Rupert
Wette, Viktor
Pichler, Angelika
Petru, Edgar
Dubsky, Peter C.
Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna
Fesl, Christian
Rudas, Margaretha
Ståhlberg, Anders
Graf, Ricarda
Weber, Sabrina
Dandachi, Nadia
Filipits, Martin
Gnant, Michael
Balic, Marija
Heitzer, Ellen
author_facet Zhou, Qing
Gampenrieder, Simon P.
Frantal, Sophie
Rinnerthaler, Gabriel
Singer, Christian F.
Egle, Daniel
Pfeiler, Georg
Bartsch, Rupert
Wette, Viktor
Pichler, Angelika
Petru, Edgar
Dubsky, Peter C.
Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna
Fesl, Christian
Rudas, Margaretha
Ståhlberg, Anders
Graf, Ricarda
Weber, Sabrina
Dandachi, Nadia
Filipits, Martin
Gnant, Michael
Balic, Marija
Heitzer, Ellen
author_sort Zhou, Qing
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Accurate response assessment during neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) poses a clinical challenge. Therefore, a minimally invasive assessment of tumor response based on cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may be beneficial to guide treatment decisions. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We profiled 93 genes in tissue from 193 patients with early breast cancer. Patient-specific assays were designed for 145 patients to track ctDNA during NST in plasma. ctDNA presence and levels were correlated with complete pathological response (pCR) and residual cancer burden (RCB) as well as clinicopathologic characteristics of the tumor to identify potential proxies for ctDNA release. RESULTS: At baseline, ctDNA could be detected in 63/145 (43.4%) patients and persisted in 25/63 (39.7%) patients at mid-therapy (MT) and 15/63 (23.8%) patients at the end of treatment. ctDNA detection at MT was significantly associated with higher RCB (OR = 0.062; 95% CI, 0.01–0.48; P = 0.0077). Of 31 patients with detectable ctDNA at MT, 30 patients (96.8%) were nonresponders (RCB II, n = 8; RCB III, n = 22) and only one patient responded to the treatment (RCB I). Considering all 145 patients with baseline (BL) plasma, none of the patients with RCB 0 and only 6.7% of patients with RCB I had ctDNA detectable at MT, whereas 30.6% and 29.6% of patients with RCB II/III, respectively, had a positive ctDNA result. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our results demonstrate that the detection and persistence of ctDNA at MT may have the potential to negatively predict response to neoadjuvant treatment and identify patients who will not achieve pCR or be classified with RCB II/III.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9377752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Association for Cancer Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93777522023-01-05 Persistence of ctDNA in Patients with Breast Cancer During Neoadjuvant Treatment Is a Significant Predictor of Poor Tumor Response Zhou, Qing Gampenrieder, Simon P. Frantal, Sophie Rinnerthaler, Gabriel Singer, Christian F. Egle, Daniel Pfeiler, Georg Bartsch, Rupert Wette, Viktor Pichler, Angelika Petru, Edgar Dubsky, Peter C. Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna Fesl, Christian Rudas, Margaretha Ståhlberg, Anders Graf, Ricarda Weber, Sabrina Dandachi, Nadia Filipits, Martin Gnant, Michael Balic, Marija Heitzer, Ellen Clin Cancer Res Precision Medicine and Imaging PURPOSE: Accurate response assessment during neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) poses a clinical challenge. Therefore, a minimally invasive assessment of tumor response based on cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may be beneficial to guide treatment decisions. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We profiled 93 genes in tissue from 193 patients with early breast cancer. Patient-specific assays were designed for 145 patients to track ctDNA during NST in plasma. ctDNA presence and levels were correlated with complete pathological response (pCR) and residual cancer burden (RCB) as well as clinicopathologic characteristics of the tumor to identify potential proxies for ctDNA release. RESULTS: At baseline, ctDNA could be detected in 63/145 (43.4%) patients and persisted in 25/63 (39.7%) patients at mid-therapy (MT) and 15/63 (23.8%) patients at the end of treatment. ctDNA detection at MT was significantly associated with higher RCB (OR = 0.062; 95% CI, 0.01–0.48; P = 0.0077). Of 31 patients with detectable ctDNA at MT, 30 patients (96.8%) were nonresponders (RCB II, n = 8; RCB III, n = 22) and only one patient responded to the treatment (RCB I). Considering all 145 patients with baseline (BL) plasma, none of the patients with RCB 0 and only 6.7% of patients with RCB I had ctDNA detectable at MT, whereas 30.6% and 29.6% of patients with RCB II/III, respectively, had a positive ctDNA result. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our results demonstrate that the detection and persistence of ctDNA at MT may have the potential to negatively predict response to neoadjuvant treatment and identify patients who will not achieve pCR or be classified with RCB II/III. American Association for Cancer Research 2022-02-15 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9377752/ /pubmed/34862246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3231 Text en ©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.
spellingShingle Precision Medicine and Imaging
Zhou, Qing
Gampenrieder, Simon P.
Frantal, Sophie
Rinnerthaler, Gabriel
Singer, Christian F.
Egle, Daniel
Pfeiler, Georg
Bartsch, Rupert
Wette, Viktor
Pichler, Angelika
Petru, Edgar
Dubsky, Peter C.
Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna
Fesl, Christian
Rudas, Margaretha
Ståhlberg, Anders
Graf, Ricarda
Weber, Sabrina
Dandachi, Nadia
Filipits, Martin
Gnant, Michael
Balic, Marija
Heitzer, Ellen
Persistence of ctDNA in Patients with Breast Cancer During Neoadjuvant Treatment Is a Significant Predictor of Poor Tumor Response
title Persistence of ctDNA in Patients with Breast Cancer During Neoadjuvant Treatment Is a Significant Predictor of Poor Tumor Response
title_full Persistence of ctDNA in Patients with Breast Cancer During Neoadjuvant Treatment Is a Significant Predictor of Poor Tumor Response
title_fullStr Persistence of ctDNA in Patients with Breast Cancer During Neoadjuvant Treatment Is a Significant Predictor of Poor Tumor Response
title_full_unstemmed Persistence of ctDNA in Patients with Breast Cancer During Neoadjuvant Treatment Is a Significant Predictor of Poor Tumor Response
title_short Persistence of ctDNA in Patients with Breast Cancer During Neoadjuvant Treatment Is a Significant Predictor of Poor Tumor Response
title_sort persistence of ctdna in patients with breast cancer during neoadjuvant treatment is a significant predictor of poor tumor response
topic Precision Medicine and Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34862246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3231
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouqing persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT gampenriedersimonp persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT frantalsophie persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT rinnerthalergabriel persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT singerchristianf persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT egledaniel persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT pfeilergeorg persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT bartschrupert persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT wetteviktor persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT pichlerangelika persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT petruedgar persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT dubskypeterc persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT bagohorvathzsuzsanna persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT feslchristian persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT rudasmargaretha persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT stahlberganders persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT grafricarda persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT webersabrina persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT dandachinadia persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT filipitsmartin persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT gnantmichael persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT balicmarija persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse
AT heitzerellen persistenceofctdnainpatientswithbreastcancerduringneoadjuvanttreatmentisasignificantpredictorofpoortumorresponse