Cargando…

Shear bond strengths of five porcelain repair systems to zirconia infrastructures

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of five porcelain repair systems on shear bond strength in composite and zirconia infrastructures and to identify the bond failure mode after thermocycling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Disk-shaped zirconia samples (n=50) were divided into five groups (n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-hmadi, Sirageddin, Erol, Funda, Guven Celik, Melahat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9377777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36003840
http://dx.doi.org/10.26650/eor.2022962372
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of five porcelain repair systems on shear bond strength in composite and zirconia infrastructures and to identify the bond failure mode after thermocycling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Disk-shaped zirconia samples (n=50) were divided into five groups (n=10) according to repairing system type. Each repair system was applied to the zirconium samples and a hybrid composite was used for repairing. Shear bond testing of all groups was carried out using a universal testing machine after thermocycling. RESULTS: Repair systems demonstrated no significant difference in repairing zirconia except Single Bond. Single Bond was the weakest in repairing the infrastructures. The highest and lowest mean bond strength values for the zirconia groups were 18,91 MPa and 3,63 MPa, respectively. CONCLUSION: The three repair systems, Ivoclar, Clearfil, and Bisco, were more effective than the Single Bond and Ultradent repair systems in repairing zirconia, and their bond failure modes were both mixed and adhesive.