Cargando…

Evaluation of Fife Forensic CMHT Liaison Services Over 10 Years

AIMS: Fife FCMHT offer two forms of liaison; a court liaison service and a consultation service open to any professional requiring guidance on managing a person with mental disorder and offending behaviour. Our aims are to evaluate these services by analysing the number of referrals, reason for refe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duthie, Leanne, Pike, Elspeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9378012/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.80
_version_ 1784768459075223552
author Duthie, Leanne
Pike, Elspeth
author_facet Duthie, Leanne
Pike, Elspeth
author_sort Duthie, Leanne
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Fife FCMHT offer two forms of liaison; a court liaison service and a consultation service open to any professional requiring guidance on managing a person with mental disorder and offending behaviour. Our aims are to evaluate these services by analysing the number of referrals, reason for referral and outcomes in order to assess how our services are being used and help identify any areas for improvement. METHODS: Details about each referral made to the court liaison and consultation services and outcomes were recorded from January 2011 to December 2021. Data were analysed in excel. RESULTS: Court Liaison Service 1044 referrals were made; 778 of these were assessed. 98.7% were seen on day of referral. 76 required inpatient admission, 9 of whom had to be remanded in custody to await appropriate bed. Age ranged 15–78 years. Of those deemed fit to continue through court, 33% were felt to require further mental health input. Consultation Service 280 referrals were made. Age ranged 15–83 years. The majority of referrals to this service came from criminal justice social work and NHS fife services. The majority of referrals were for specific advice or help with risk assessment and management. The average time between referral and consultation was 9.4 days. CONCLUSION: Reassuringly, our team responds promptly to referrals. 25.5% of referrals made to the court service did not require assessment after triage. Only 7.3% of referrals required diversion away from the court system. Whilst 33% of those deemed fit to continue were identified as requiring further mental health input, this was often in the form of signposting to local services. As referrals are usually seen by health care in custody, this suggests mental health training for these teams would be of benefit to prevent delays in court proceedings and prevent unnecessary referrals. Of concern are those patients remanded in custody to await a psychiatric bed. Whilst numbers are small, it is an unacceptable outcome for these patients. This occurs due to no bed being available or a requirement for assessment by the admitting unit. This mirrors findings from the Barron Report. Our consultation service sees requests from a vast array of professionals. We believe this to be an efficient way for services to access the expertise within our team, avoiding unnecessary referrals causing delays to patient care. The majority of these referrals were for advice over a specific matter which can be dealt with succinctly by the team.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9378012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93780122022-08-18 Evaluation of Fife Forensic CMHT Liaison Services Over 10 Years Duthie, Leanne Pike, Elspeth BJPsych Open Rapid-Fire Presentation AIMS: Fife FCMHT offer two forms of liaison; a court liaison service and a consultation service open to any professional requiring guidance on managing a person with mental disorder and offending behaviour. Our aims are to evaluate these services by analysing the number of referrals, reason for referral and outcomes in order to assess how our services are being used and help identify any areas for improvement. METHODS: Details about each referral made to the court liaison and consultation services and outcomes were recorded from January 2011 to December 2021. Data were analysed in excel. RESULTS: Court Liaison Service 1044 referrals were made; 778 of these were assessed. 98.7% were seen on day of referral. 76 required inpatient admission, 9 of whom had to be remanded in custody to await appropriate bed. Age ranged 15–78 years. Of those deemed fit to continue through court, 33% were felt to require further mental health input. Consultation Service 280 referrals were made. Age ranged 15–83 years. The majority of referrals to this service came from criminal justice social work and NHS fife services. The majority of referrals were for specific advice or help with risk assessment and management. The average time between referral and consultation was 9.4 days. CONCLUSION: Reassuringly, our team responds promptly to referrals. 25.5% of referrals made to the court service did not require assessment after triage. Only 7.3% of referrals required diversion away from the court system. Whilst 33% of those deemed fit to continue were identified as requiring further mental health input, this was often in the form of signposting to local services. As referrals are usually seen by health care in custody, this suggests mental health training for these teams would be of benefit to prevent delays in court proceedings and prevent unnecessary referrals. Of concern are those patients remanded in custody to await a psychiatric bed. Whilst numbers are small, it is an unacceptable outcome for these patients. This occurs due to no bed being available or a requirement for assessment by the admitting unit. This mirrors findings from the Barron Report. Our consultation service sees requests from a vast array of professionals. We believe this to be an efficient way for services to access the expertise within our team, avoiding unnecessary referrals causing delays to patient care. The majority of these referrals were for advice over a specific matter which can be dealt with succinctly by the team. Cambridge University Press 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9378012/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.80 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Rapid-Fire Presentation
Duthie, Leanne
Pike, Elspeth
Evaluation of Fife Forensic CMHT Liaison Services Over 10 Years
title Evaluation of Fife Forensic CMHT Liaison Services Over 10 Years
title_full Evaluation of Fife Forensic CMHT Liaison Services Over 10 Years
title_fullStr Evaluation of Fife Forensic CMHT Liaison Services Over 10 Years
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Fife Forensic CMHT Liaison Services Over 10 Years
title_short Evaluation of Fife Forensic CMHT Liaison Services Over 10 Years
title_sort evaluation of fife forensic cmht liaison services over 10 years
topic Rapid-Fire Presentation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9378012/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.80
work_keys_str_mv AT duthieleanne evaluationoffifeforensiccmhtliaisonservicesover10years
AT pikeelspeth evaluationoffifeforensiccmhtliaisonservicesover10years