Cargando…

Physical Health Screening in a Mental Health Setting

AIMS: Research demonstrates greater mortality and physical health morbidity in those with mental illness, as compared to the general population. National Health Service (NHS) England has introduced policies to reflect this and promote improvements in physical healthcare for mental health patients. I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Middleton, Laura, Ashcroft, Katherine, Mather, Alex, Gargan, Georgina, Older, Abby, Mitchell, Andrew, Shaw, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9378032/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.88
_version_ 1784768464005627904
author Middleton, Laura
Ashcroft, Katherine
Mather, Alex
Gargan, Georgina
Older, Abby
Mitchell, Andrew
Shaw, Elizabeth
author_facet Middleton, Laura
Ashcroft, Katherine
Mather, Alex
Gargan, Georgina
Older, Abby
Mitchell, Andrew
Shaw, Elizabeth
author_sort Middleton, Laura
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Research demonstrates greater mortality and physical health morbidity in those with mental illness, as compared to the general population. National Health Service (NHS) England has introduced policies to reflect this and promote improvements in physical healthcare for mental health patients. Inpatient admission provides a valuable opportunity to action such recommendations and offer a detailed health review, guided by local frameworks. A new annual audit commenced in Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (CWP) assesses admission physical health screening on its adult acute inpatient wards. METHODS: Audit standard was 100% compliance to CWP's admission pathway (Policy CP35). Parameters included doctor's review, medical history, physical examination, drug history, medication chart, allergy status, venous thromboembolic risk, blood tests, electrocardiogram (ECG), physiological observations, smoking history, body mass index (BMI) and falls risk. Data were collected retrospectively for all patients admitted or transferred to Juniper Ward, an acute adult inpatient unit in Bowmere Hospital in Chester, during October 2020 (cycle 1) and September 2021 (cycle 2). Different months were assessed due to senior staff changes in October 2021. RESULTS: 30 patients were identified in 2020 and 37 in 2021. In 2020 the most consistently achieved parameters were, in order, medication chart/drug history, doctor's review and past medical history. In 2021 the most consistently achieved parameters were medication chart/drug history, smoking status and past medical history. Across both years completion of the cardiometabolic tool was lowest, although this improved from 6.7% to 16.2%. In 2020 there were 5 parameters achieving <50% compliance (cardiometabolic, physiological observations, smoking status, BMI and falls risk). In 2021 this reduced to 3 parameters (doctor's review, cardiometabolic tool, falls risk). Local policy was updated following the 2020 results, amending the criteria for doctor's review from commenced within 6 hours, to completed within 12 hours. Improvement was seen in all other areas in 2021, with medication chart/drug history documentation achieved in 100% of admissions. CONCLUSION: Generalised improvement was seen following the 2020 audit, although only one parameter reached 100% compliance and most remained under 75%. The first cycle led to a policy change with respect to the doctor's review timeframe, although this limited direct comparison between years. A flow chart will be trialled on Juniper Ward, highlighting required tasks and assigning ownership to specific team members. The local Medical Education team were also made aware of the results to inform junior doctor induction. The audit will be repeated in Autumn 2022.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9378032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93780322022-08-18 Physical Health Screening in a Mental Health Setting Middleton, Laura Ashcroft, Katherine Mather, Alex Gargan, Georgina Older, Abby Mitchell, Andrew Shaw, Elizabeth BJPsych Open Rapid-Fire Presentation AIMS: Research demonstrates greater mortality and physical health morbidity in those with mental illness, as compared to the general population. National Health Service (NHS) England has introduced policies to reflect this and promote improvements in physical healthcare for mental health patients. Inpatient admission provides a valuable opportunity to action such recommendations and offer a detailed health review, guided by local frameworks. A new annual audit commenced in Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (CWP) assesses admission physical health screening on its adult acute inpatient wards. METHODS: Audit standard was 100% compliance to CWP's admission pathway (Policy CP35). Parameters included doctor's review, medical history, physical examination, drug history, medication chart, allergy status, venous thromboembolic risk, blood tests, electrocardiogram (ECG), physiological observations, smoking history, body mass index (BMI) and falls risk. Data were collected retrospectively for all patients admitted or transferred to Juniper Ward, an acute adult inpatient unit in Bowmere Hospital in Chester, during October 2020 (cycle 1) and September 2021 (cycle 2). Different months were assessed due to senior staff changes in October 2021. RESULTS: 30 patients were identified in 2020 and 37 in 2021. In 2020 the most consistently achieved parameters were, in order, medication chart/drug history, doctor's review and past medical history. In 2021 the most consistently achieved parameters were medication chart/drug history, smoking status and past medical history. Across both years completion of the cardiometabolic tool was lowest, although this improved from 6.7% to 16.2%. In 2020 there were 5 parameters achieving <50% compliance (cardiometabolic, physiological observations, smoking status, BMI and falls risk). In 2021 this reduced to 3 parameters (doctor's review, cardiometabolic tool, falls risk). Local policy was updated following the 2020 results, amending the criteria for doctor's review from commenced within 6 hours, to completed within 12 hours. Improvement was seen in all other areas in 2021, with medication chart/drug history documentation achieved in 100% of admissions. CONCLUSION: Generalised improvement was seen following the 2020 audit, although only one parameter reached 100% compliance and most remained under 75%. The first cycle led to a policy change with respect to the doctor's review timeframe, although this limited direct comparison between years. A flow chart will be trialled on Juniper Ward, highlighting required tasks and assigning ownership to specific team members. The local Medical Education team were also made aware of the results to inform junior doctor induction. The audit will be repeated in Autumn 2022. Cambridge University Press 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9378032/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.88 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Rapid-Fire Presentation
Middleton, Laura
Ashcroft, Katherine
Mather, Alex
Gargan, Georgina
Older, Abby
Mitchell, Andrew
Shaw, Elizabeth
Physical Health Screening in a Mental Health Setting
title Physical Health Screening in a Mental Health Setting
title_full Physical Health Screening in a Mental Health Setting
title_fullStr Physical Health Screening in a Mental Health Setting
title_full_unstemmed Physical Health Screening in a Mental Health Setting
title_short Physical Health Screening in a Mental Health Setting
title_sort physical health screening in a mental health setting
topic Rapid-Fire Presentation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9378032/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.88
work_keys_str_mv AT middletonlaura physicalhealthscreeninginamentalhealthsetting
AT ashcroftkatherine physicalhealthscreeninginamentalhealthsetting
AT matheralex physicalhealthscreeninginamentalhealthsetting
AT gargangeorgina physicalhealthscreeninginamentalhealthsetting
AT olderabby physicalhealthscreeninginamentalhealthsetting
AT mitchellandrew physicalhealthscreeninginamentalhealthsetting
AT shawelizabeth physicalhealthscreeninginamentalhealthsetting