Cargando…

Timeliness and Quality of Response to Referrals Received by a Psychiatry Liaison Service for Older Adults During a Pandemic

AIMS: To improve timeliness of response and provide a committed plan to referrals received by the liaison service for older adults in Croydon University Hospital. Background: A quality improvement project in 2019 aimed to evaluate effectiveness of the liaison referral pathway. A questionnaire distri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beehuspoteea, Nirja, Wilcha, Robyn-Jenia, Edwards, Amelia, Mbazira, Agnes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9378295/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.279
_version_ 1784768529156800512
author Beehuspoteea, Nirja
Wilcha, Robyn-Jenia
Edwards, Amelia
Mbazira, Agnes
author_facet Beehuspoteea, Nirja
Wilcha, Robyn-Jenia
Edwards, Amelia
Mbazira, Agnes
author_sort Beehuspoteea, Nirja
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To improve timeliness of response and provide a committed plan to referrals received by the liaison service for older adults in Croydon University Hospital. Background: A quality improvement project in 2019 aimed to evaluate effectiveness of the liaison referral pathway. A questionnaire distributed to ward staff revealed some comments regarding ‘non-committal advice’ given by the liaison team. METHODS: Data were collected from 44 referrals received by the liaison team in June 2021. Variables included referral date, reason for referral, date of first assessment, plan documented in the notes, date and details of committed plan of action. 1. a. Prompt discussions with senior members of the team following assessment to discuss diagnosis and management. b. Team teaching sessions were organised once a week, in the form of case-based discussions and role play, to improve communication skills, confidence and history-taking. Data were then collected from 48 referrals received in September and October 2021. RESULTS: Of the 44 patients in June, average time taken from point of referral to assessment was 1.27 days and to providing a concrete plan 1.80 days. Of the 48 patients between end of September and October, average time to assessment was 1.31 days and to providing a concrete plan 1.88 days. In June, 75% of patients were seen on same day or within one day and 50% had a concrete plan within one day. In September/October, 65% of patients were seen on same day or within one day and 52% had a concrete plan within one day. CONCLUSION: These results highlight that assessments by older adult liaison service require detailed collateral history, investigations and MDT discussions. While ‘obtain collateral history’ may not seem as committed a plan as prescribing medication, it remains an important part of old age psychiatry. Given the rapid turnover of patients and increased pressures during the pandemic, it is the responsibility of the liaison team to communicate effectively with the wards and offer a timeline for completion of plan. Following above changes, another questionnaire has been sent to request feedback on effectiveness of the liaison team.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9378295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93782952022-08-26 Timeliness and Quality of Response to Referrals Received by a Psychiatry Liaison Service for Older Adults During a Pandemic Beehuspoteea, Nirja Wilcha, Robyn-Jenia Edwards, Amelia Mbazira, Agnes BJPsych Open Quality Improvement AIMS: To improve timeliness of response and provide a committed plan to referrals received by the liaison service for older adults in Croydon University Hospital. Background: A quality improvement project in 2019 aimed to evaluate effectiveness of the liaison referral pathway. A questionnaire distributed to ward staff revealed some comments regarding ‘non-committal advice’ given by the liaison team. METHODS: Data were collected from 44 referrals received by the liaison team in June 2021. Variables included referral date, reason for referral, date of first assessment, plan documented in the notes, date and details of committed plan of action. 1. a. Prompt discussions with senior members of the team following assessment to discuss diagnosis and management. b. Team teaching sessions were organised once a week, in the form of case-based discussions and role play, to improve communication skills, confidence and history-taking. Data were then collected from 48 referrals received in September and October 2021. RESULTS: Of the 44 patients in June, average time taken from point of referral to assessment was 1.27 days and to providing a concrete plan 1.80 days. Of the 48 patients between end of September and October, average time to assessment was 1.31 days and to providing a concrete plan 1.88 days. In June, 75% of patients were seen on same day or within one day and 50% had a concrete plan within one day. In September/October, 65% of patients were seen on same day or within one day and 52% had a concrete plan within one day. CONCLUSION: These results highlight that assessments by older adult liaison service require detailed collateral history, investigations and MDT discussions. While ‘obtain collateral history’ may not seem as committed a plan as prescribing medication, it remains an important part of old age psychiatry. Given the rapid turnover of patients and increased pressures during the pandemic, it is the responsibility of the liaison team to communicate effectively with the wards and offer a timeline for completion of plan. Following above changes, another questionnaire has been sent to request feedback on effectiveness of the liaison team. Cambridge University Press 2022-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9378295/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.279 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement
Beehuspoteea, Nirja
Wilcha, Robyn-Jenia
Edwards, Amelia
Mbazira, Agnes
Timeliness and Quality of Response to Referrals Received by a Psychiatry Liaison Service for Older Adults During a Pandemic
title Timeliness and Quality of Response to Referrals Received by a Psychiatry Liaison Service for Older Adults During a Pandemic
title_full Timeliness and Quality of Response to Referrals Received by a Psychiatry Liaison Service for Older Adults During a Pandemic
title_fullStr Timeliness and Quality of Response to Referrals Received by a Psychiatry Liaison Service for Older Adults During a Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Timeliness and Quality of Response to Referrals Received by a Psychiatry Liaison Service for Older Adults During a Pandemic
title_short Timeliness and Quality of Response to Referrals Received by a Psychiatry Liaison Service for Older Adults During a Pandemic
title_sort timeliness and quality of response to referrals received by a psychiatry liaison service for older adults during a pandemic
topic Quality Improvement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9378295/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.279
work_keys_str_mv AT beehuspoteeanirja timelinessandqualityofresponsetoreferralsreceivedbyapsychiatryliaisonserviceforolderadultsduringapandemic
AT wilcharobynjenia timelinessandqualityofresponsetoreferralsreceivedbyapsychiatryliaisonserviceforolderadultsduringapandemic
AT edwardsamelia timelinessandqualityofresponsetoreferralsreceivedbyapsychiatryliaisonserviceforolderadultsduringapandemic
AT mbaziraagnes timelinessandqualityofresponsetoreferralsreceivedbyapsychiatryliaisonserviceforolderadultsduringapandemic