Cargando…
Performance of a trigger tool for detecting adverse drug reactions in patients with polypharmacy acutely admitted to the geriatric ward
PURPOSE: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) account for 10% of acute hospital admissions in older people, often under-recognised by physicians. The Dutch geriatric guideline recommends screening all acutely admitted older patients with polypharmacy with an ADR trigger tool comprising ten triggers and ass...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9378479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35635713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-022-00649-x |
_version_ | 1784768555579867136 |
---|---|
author | Noorda, Nikki M. F. Sallevelt, Bastiaan T. G. M. Langendijk, Wivien L. Egberts, Toine C. G. van Puijenbroek, Eugène P. Wilting, Ingeborg Knol, Wilma |
author_facet | Noorda, Nikki M. F. Sallevelt, Bastiaan T. G. M. Langendijk, Wivien L. Egberts, Toine C. G. van Puijenbroek, Eugène P. Wilting, Ingeborg Knol, Wilma |
author_sort | Noorda, Nikki M. F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) account for 10% of acute hospital admissions in older people, often under-recognised by physicians. The Dutch geriatric guideline recommends screening all acutely admitted older patients with polypharmacy with an ADR trigger tool comprising ten triggers and associated drugs frequently causing ADRs. This study investigated the performance of this tool and the recognition by usual care of ADRs detected with the tool. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in patients ≥ 70 years with polypharmacy acutely admitted to the geriatric ward of the University Medical Centre Utrecht. Electronic health records (EHRs) were screened for trigger–drug combinations listed in the ADR trigger tool. Two independent appraisers assessed causal probability with the WHO-UMC algorithm and screened EHRs for recognition of ADRs by attending physicians. Performance of the tool was defined as the positive predictive value (PPV) for ADRs with a possible, probable or certain causal relation. RESULTS: In total, 941 trigger–drug combinations were present in 73% (n = 253/345) of the patients. The triggers fall, delirium, renal insufficiency and hyponatraemia covered 86% (n = 810/941) of all trigger–drug combinations. The overall PPV was 41.8% (n = 393/941), but the PPV for individual triggers was highly variable ranging from 0 to 100%. Usual care recognised the majority of ADRs (83.5%), increasing to 97.1% when restricted to possible and certain ADRs. CONCLUSION: The ADR trigger tool has predictive value; however, its implementation is unlikely to improve the detection of unrecognised ADRs in older patients acutely admitted to our geriatric ward. Future research is needed to investigate the tool’s clinical value when applied to older patients acutely admitted to non-geriatric wards. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41999-022-00649-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9378479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93784792022-08-17 Performance of a trigger tool for detecting adverse drug reactions in patients with polypharmacy acutely admitted to the geriatric ward Noorda, Nikki M. F. Sallevelt, Bastiaan T. G. M. Langendijk, Wivien L. Egberts, Toine C. G. van Puijenbroek, Eugène P. Wilting, Ingeborg Knol, Wilma Eur Geriatr Med Research Paper PURPOSE: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) account for 10% of acute hospital admissions in older people, often under-recognised by physicians. The Dutch geriatric guideline recommends screening all acutely admitted older patients with polypharmacy with an ADR trigger tool comprising ten triggers and associated drugs frequently causing ADRs. This study investigated the performance of this tool and the recognition by usual care of ADRs detected with the tool. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in patients ≥ 70 years with polypharmacy acutely admitted to the geriatric ward of the University Medical Centre Utrecht. Electronic health records (EHRs) were screened for trigger–drug combinations listed in the ADR trigger tool. Two independent appraisers assessed causal probability with the WHO-UMC algorithm and screened EHRs for recognition of ADRs by attending physicians. Performance of the tool was defined as the positive predictive value (PPV) for ADRs with a possible, probable or certain causal relation. RESULTS: In total, 941 trigger–drug combinations were present in 73% (n = 253/345) of the patients. The triggers fall, delirium, renal insufficiency and hyponatraemia covered 86% (n = 810/941) of all trigger–drug combinations. The overall PPV was 41.8% (n = 393/941), but the PPV for individual triggers was highly variable ranging from 0 to 100%. Usual care recognised the majority of ADRs (83.5%), increasing to 97.1% when restricted to possible and certain ADRs. CONCLUSION: The ADR trigger tool has predictive value; however, its implementation is unlikely to improve the detection of unrecognised ADRs in older patients acutely admitted to our geriatric ward. Future research is needed to investigate the tool’s clinical value when applied to older patients acutely admitted to non-geriatric wards. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41999-022-00649-x. Springer International Publishing 2022-05-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9378479/ /pubmed/35635713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-022-00649-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Noorda, Nikki M. F. Sallevelt, Bastiaan T. G. M. Langendijk, Wivien L. Egberts, Toine C. G. van Puijenbroek, Eugène P. Wilting, Ingeborg Knol, Wilma Performance of a trigger tool for detecting adverse drug reactions in patients with polypharmacy acutely admitted to the geriatric ward |
title | Performance of a trigger tool for detecting adverse drug reactions in patients with polypharmacy acutely admitted to the geriatric ward |
title_full | Performance of a trigger tool for detecting adverse drug reactions in patients with polypharmacy acutely admitted to the geriatric ward |
title_fullStr | Performance of a trigger tool for detecting adverse drug reactions in patients with polypharmacy acutely admitted to the geriatric ward |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of a trigger tool for detecting adverse drug reactions in patients with polypharmacy acutely admitted to the geriatric ward |
title_short | Performance of a trigger tool for detecting adverse drug reactions in patients with polypharmacy acutely admitted to the geriatric ward |
title_sort | performance of a trigger tool for detecting adverse drug reactions in patients with polypharmacy acutely admitted to the geriatric ward |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9378479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35635713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-022-00649-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noordanikkimf performanceofatriggertoolfordetectingadversedrugreactionsinpatientswithpolypharmacyacutelyadmittedtothegeriatricward AT salleveltbastiaantgm performanceofatriggertoolfordetectingadversedrugreactionsinpatientswithpolypharmacyacutelyadmittedtothegeriatricward AT langendijkwivienl performanceofatriggertoolfordetectingadversedrugreactionsinpatientswithpolypharmacyacutelyadmittedtothegeriatricward AT egbertstoinecg performanceofatriggertoolfordetectingadversedrugreactionsinpatientswithpolypharmacyacutelyadmittedtothegeriatricward AT vanpuijenbroekeugenep performanceofatriggertoolfordetectingadversedrugreactionsinpatientswithpolypharmacyacutelyadmittedtothegeriatricward AT wiltingingeborg performanceofatriggertoolfordetectingadversedrugreactionsinpatientswithpolypharmacyacutelyadmittedtothegeriatricward AT knolwilma performanceofatriggertoolfordetectingadversedrugreactionsinpatientswithpolypharmacyacutelyadmittedtothegeriatricward |