Cargando…

Conceptualizing controversies in the EU circular bioeconomy transition

The transition towards a circular bioeconomy (CBE) in the European Union is not without contestation. In particular, research has highlighted potential trade-offs of the large-scale production of bio-resources, for instance with environmental quality goals. To date, however, it remains underexplored...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Starke, Jan R., Metze, Tamara A. P., Candel, Jeroen J. L., Termeer, Catrien J. A. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9378795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01730-2
_version_ 1784768587538366464
author Starke, Jan R.
Metze, Tamara A. P.
Candel, Jeroen J. L.
Termeer, Catrien J. A. M.
author_facet Starke, Jan R.
Metze, Tamara A. P.
Candel, Jeroen J. L.
Termeer, Catrien J. A. M.
author_sort Starke, Jan R.
collection PubMed
description The transition towards a circular bioeconomy (CBE) in the European Union is not without contestation. In particular, research has highlighted potential trade-offs of the large-scale production of bio-resources, for instance with environmental quality goals. To date, however, it remains underexplored in the CBE literature how controversies develop throughout a transition process. To address this gap, this paper explores where controversies are situated in a transition, how they change throughout, and how they influence the transition process. First, we suggest that controversies can be situated on and between different system layers within a transition. Second, we offer an explanation of how controversies evolve, as actors confirm, integrate, disintegrate and polarize underlying storylines. Third, these controversies can have both productive and unproductive outcomes while they unfold throughout a transition. We illustrate this understanding with the example of biorefineries as CBE key technology and discuss a research agenda on controversies in sustainability transitions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9378795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93787952022-08-17 Conceptualizing controversies in the EU circular bioeconomy transition Starke, Jan R. Metze, Tamara A. P. Candel, Jeroen J. L. Termeer, Catrien J. A. M. Ambio Perspective The transition towards a circular bioeconomy (CBE) in the European Union is not without contestation. In particular, research has highlighted potential trade-offs of the large-scale production of bio-resources, for instance with environmental quality goals. To date, however, it remains underexplored in the CBE literature how controversies develop throughout a transition process. To address this gap, this paper explores where controversies are situated in a transition, how they change throughout, and how they influence the transition process. First, we suggest that controversies can be situated on and between different system layers within a transition. Second, we offer an explanation of how controversies evolve, as actors confirm, integrate, disintegrate and polarize underlying storylines. Third, these controversies can have both productive and unproductive outcomes while they unfold throughout a transition. We illustrate this understanding with the example of biorefineries as CBE key technology and discuss a research agenda on controversies in sustainability transitions. Springer Netherlands 2022-03-23 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9378795/ /pubmed/35320514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01730-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Perspective
Starke, Jan R.
Metze, Tamara A. P.
Candel, Jeroen J. L.
Termeer, Catrien J. A. M.
Conceptualizing controversies in the EU circular bioeconomy transition
title Conceptualizing controversies in the EU circular bioeconomy transition
title_full Conceptualizing controversies in the EU circular bioeconomy transition
title_fullStr Conceptualizing controversies in the EU circular bioeconomy transition
title_full_unstemmed Conceptualizing controversies in the EU circular bioeconomy transition
title_short Conceptualizing controversies in the EU circular bioeconomy transition
title_sort conceptualizing controversies in the eu circular bioeconomy transition
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9378795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01730-2
work_keys_str_mv AT starkejanr conceptualizingcontroversiesintheeucircularbioeconomytransition
AT metzetamaraap conceptualizingcontroversiesintheeucircularbioeconomytransition
AT candeljeroenjl conceptualizingcontroversiesintheeucircularbioeconomytransition
AT termeercatrienjam conceptualizingcontroversiesintheeucircularbioeconomytransition